WHITE HOUSE DAMAGE CONTROL: OBAMACARE REPEAL WILL ‘COST TOO MUCH.’ Yes it’s always better to continue to throw good money after bad! Eleventy!
WHITE HOUSE DAMAGE CONTROL: OBAMACARE REPEAL WILL ‘COST TOO MUCH.’ Yes it’s always better to continue to throw good money after bad! Eleventy!
This website uses cookies.
View Comments (22)
I found this piece enlightening. Not really on topic here but I urge you to read it.
http://nomocracyinpolitics.com/2013/12/13/the-united-states-as-three-republics-an-unorthodox-constitutional-history/
Interesting reading.. seems a stretch to say that Lincoln reconstituted the Republic in a single speech. I'd be more comfortable acknowledging this occurred in the crucible of secession and war, with the subsequent Amendments in tow
Agree but he certainly set the theme for the post war 'nation'.
Another lie. The WH has no concept of something costing too much.
BULLSHIT , won't cost nothing more than a vote from these assholes (democrats) in the opposite direction, just like how they passed it to begin with. This was passed into law by nothing but democrats, not a single republican voted for this, and a couple of democrat congress people. All the democrat senators voted for it, all of them. That night 3- 23- 2010 was the most horrific thing I ever witnessed, and knew then we had just become the USSA, period!
Why doesn't president Obuttheasd start with the 4 million for his annual Hawaiian vacation with wookie and company? That four million would feed an awful lot of pajama wearing, basement living loosers......
http://www.therightreasons.net/index.php?/topic/54011-todays-toons-122013/
LOL! I just posted this on the thread below, but it fits here just as well:
The costs of a full repeal will be much lower than full implimentation.
I still don’t know why they had to screw everyone’s insurance for a small percentage of uninsured people.
Just because people aren’t insured doesn’t mean they wanted insurance either. That is the one assumption tat was being made from the beginning, and it’s wrong.
Mr $17 Trillion deficit would purport to know what costs too much? The trick of the narrative is that it isn't money that repeal would cost too much of.. it's the nefarious political currency of destroyed productivity through job loss and under/unemployment that is intended to bring what was formerly the middle class to its knees that a repeal would cost. This court and congress-enabled criminal consortium that's doing all it can to run the country into the ground has made so very much progress in its agenda. Anything that breathes life back into the economy and begins to put people back into gainful employment would deal them a huge setback. It would indeed cost them far too much.
They really meant that repealing this massively expensive joke of a health care law will cost Quagmire's administration and crony pals too much.
I get the mental image of old Jed Clampett shaking his head and saying, "Pitiful, just pitiful."
I think Jethro Bodine is the one that ciphered all the money for Obamacare.
Oh year! And Jethro sez, "do you want to hear my gazintas?"
2 gazinta 4 twice.
2 gazinta 8 three times
Granny & Uncle Jed gazinta medicare, even though they didn't wanna
Me and Ellie Mae, we gazinta Obamacare direct, just like that slick city fella with glasses an his sleepin' clothes.
You forgot Reggie gazinta Barry.
Over and over again.
Everything about progressive gov't programs are barbed hooks. As crappy as they are, it hurts more to get rid of them, & that's by design.
This Obamacare thing - is it an actual law, written down somewhere, or just whatever Barack Obama says it is?
Law?
And just what, pray tell, is this LAW thing of which you speak?
Yes it is.