Ben Affleck: Republicans ‘had a chance’: Ah yes. Sage political analysis from the guy that though making Gigli was a good idea.
This post was last modified on February 23, 2021
Ben Affleck: Republicans ‘had a chance’: Ah yes. Sage political analysis from the guy that though making Gigli was a good idea.
This post was last modified on February 23, 2021
This website uses cookies.
View Comments (26)
AS,
That is 1 of 2 that I would expect. The answer you gave is still BS because it does'nt take into account that islam has been at war with everything that is not itself since it was created.
Dany I know what your saying. Islam never has needed a reason to kill, rape, burn, etc. Heck even their holy book not even allows it but it praises it. As for my previous post on you know who. I was trying to prove a point of him being a broken record. Hope I didnt cross the line.
The HAD a chance, until they rigged their primary that is.
"The HAD a chance, until they rigged their primary that is."
Now don't be silly John. You love a rigged system. Without it a greedy statist like yourself would have to go out and get a job . . . instead of just living off the rest of ours.
TD....MO
Your thoughts about 9/11 Crowley?
I can answer that for you he is this predictable.....
It was corporate greed if Ron Paul was president this would not have happened because Ron Paul is my hero because Ron Paul doesn't like Corporate Greed because Ron Paul says corporate greed is bad.
Hows that? Close enough?
How exactly would a Libertarian "fight corporate greed"? Does he plan to enact laws that limit profits and then create an arm of the government to regulate and enforce them? Doesn't exactly sound all that libertarian.
DING DING DING. Excellent point. And even though I know your point is rhetorical I would like to answer it anyway. (Even thought it is probably completely unnecessary)
The libertarian combats corporate greed by slashing corporate taxes to zero, getting rid of minimum wage, getting rid of nearly all regulation, saying no to TARP, government loans, bail outs, tariffs and removing all the other manipulation the government exerts over the market (including much of what currently comprises monetary policy). Then with a free market so many businesses get started that they have to compete for consumers by offering better products at lower prices. Those that can't compete go out of business. And those that can are put on notice that the market is a harsh master and they'd better not screw around.
This is of course the exact opposite of what John wants. John is not a libertarian. John didn't even know who Gary Johnson was and has obviously never read John Locke, Thomas Hobbes, Ludwig Von Mises, F.A. Hayek or even Thomas Jefferson. John is a corporatist. He subsists off the very system he proclaims to hate.
I don't see how any of that "battles corporate greed." Libertarianism says "greed exists; get used to it." It doesn't battle it. One can argue that removing regulation and a minium wage improves production, but to say that it battles greed is nonsense.
I just had a stay in Anaconda, MT; a once-thriving copper town. Back in the early 1900s it was a place full of power players. The copper kings had everyone in their back pockets. They owned the newspapers, etc. If you crossed them, you left town under your own steam on in a box - take your pick. That's how it works.
Now you can say "OK, those bosses may have been monsters, but they provided jobs, built libraries, and paid for their employees' education." Great. Yes, they did that. But they WERE corrupt, they DID own the town, they WERE INDEED above the law, and the freedom they enjoyed did NOT curb their greed.
By battling greed I was (and I should have prefaced this better) being a bit tongue in cheek. The only thing I think of as greedy is taking from others what does not belong to you.
In the case of the copper barons (IMHO) the correct response would be to move out of town. That was the beauty of America. As a federation of states each local area was supposed to be different. So the solution to combating ills like that is to leave and deprive it of its labor force thus driving up its production cost and making it less effective against competition and new technologies arising. And of course that is not an elegant solution. But given that 60 percent (and rising) of our paychecks go to some sort of tax, regulation, fee or inflation I hardly think the regulations to combat such ills have worked.
Well, there's the hitch in our conversation: the definition. I refer to greed in the religious sense: just acquiring money far in excess of any reasonable need. Even if it's earned, it can keep your brain on Earthly matters and pull you away from God.
Crowley wouldn't make a zit on the ass of a Libertarian. I know this for a fact. I'm a Libertarian.
I keep fighting not to hit the blacklist button on him. If I did Mr. Editor would probably sent a hit team after me.
Or, Ron Paul would change into his Superman costume in a phone booth and lock me up with Lex Luthor.
Nah, don't blacklist JohnBoy CO2. It's kinda fun to read his asinine comments from time to time, it reminds us that some truly stupid people out there are allowed to have children and vote.
TD,...........MO.
So when can we begin to deport these idiots to Venezuela?
Why bother with all that? Why not cut off California, and call it a new separate country? As for the remaining 49 states, the average IQ would go up several points.
I may need to go into my rant about why California should be dropped and why Puerto Rico should become the new 50th state. It mostly has to do with the flag not being changed and our country being more awesome.
Not California. Just Los Angeles and San Francisco. I live in the rest of it, and it's not like that. Those two cities and their population would make a wonderful little communist island.
Don't forget Sacramento. That's where all the bonhead libtard decisions are made concerning this state. Moonbeam and Darrel Steinberg need to catch the Bullet train to an ocean cliff.
I live about a half hour from the Capitol building. I can see the stupid flowing out of it.
yes, imperative we hold onto Silicon Valley
You mean remaining 56 states don't you?
Nobody. Just another lefty idiot to ignore.
Ben who?