Columbia professor equates his incest with daughter with homosexual sex

DavidEpstein.jpg


Columbia professor equates his incest with daughter with homosexual sex. “Academically, we are obviously all morally opposed to incest and rightfully so,” said the professor’s lawyer. “‘At the same time, there is an argument to be made… to let go what goes on privately in bedrooms. It’s ok for homosexuals to do whatever they want in their own home. How is this so different?”

J.P. Travis: Born and raised in Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1976 graduate of University of Michigan, father, grandfather, husband, founder and CEO of Travelyn Publishing (http://www.travelynpublishing.com/), and passionate anti-government believer in individual liberty.

View Comments (96)

  • Further down the decadent slope we go. Leave it to a lawyer to try to come up with some reason that this would be normal.

  • It seems morality isn't high on the lists of things to practice in the Liberal World. Place your bets this turd runs for office next.

  • All those years that liberals lectured us on how all those southerners, those uneducated rednecks where all inbred...

      • Me neither. He is so right about that. It is okay if incest is done between intellectuals I guess.

        • As long as they're incesting each other and leaving the rest of us alone I can live with it, but with the news lackies at MSNBC already claiming that our children are not our own and that we should come to grips with that; I'm thinking we should just box these idiots up and send them into the sun.

  • Not too long before this too become yet just an alternative sexual orientation, you´ll get discrimination lawsuites if you refuse to hire or work with that guy and get 10 years for Hate Crime if you punch him.

  • When we're unwilling to protect our own language from the continual decline from the left, we get this sh*t! If we want our country back, we're going to have to be willing to face an exceptionally ugly opponent and do way more than just draw a f***ing line in the sand and tell them not to cross it. If we let this crap continue much more the same God who destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah is going to do way more to us and if not the citizens of Sodom and Gomorrah are going to want an apology!

    • My hope is that Jesus will have mercy on us. If He believes that there aren't enough of us to save the entire civilization, then it is my hope again that in His Divine Mercy He will do for His people what He did for Lot and his family. Take them out and destroy the rest. Feel bad for the rest but it is what it is. They chose their path, I am sure that the Lord reach out to them one way or another just like He sent the prophet Jonah to those people and the Lord relented His destruction of that place when they repented. If He has mercy on us all great, but I hope He has mercy on us His people and take us out.

      Funny we are talking Sodom and Gomorrah. Lot's wife like a fool looked back even though she was told not to (they were all told). With all those years living among the disgusting populace where even Lot was willing to let his daughters be raped by the mob, the daughters themselves fearing that the world was over slept with him while he was drunk. That whole entire situation is nasty. The depravity of our world is increasing just like it has in the past whenever civilizations turn to crap. The Lord can get rid of us all and do us no disservice nor injustice. Seriously this world is just nasty. It is my hope that He will have mercy. That is all that I can hope for.

      • Speaking of Sodom, did you notice the History Channel's Bible show covered the two cities without once mentioning homosexual sex? Even though that's where sodomy got its name? Instead they had an angel ninja with a sword... to entertain the ignorant masses I guess.

  • Ya know, one of the logical ramifications of licensing same sex marriages is that biological brothers would insist on "getting married" so that they could reap the same tax, insurance, and SS benefits that the homosexual folks are after - since they can't actually have "sex" in the reproductive sense, I don't know what the logical argument against it would be. Gee, wish I had a rich brother now!

    • This is what is funny about the whole gay marriage debate: most of the arguments for it center around the tax code. Reform that and the whole argument for it breaks down.

      • Showing my ignorance here Kick, civil unions don't take care of the tax bite? And no where to put this since FDH broke the tip jar but check this out, kinda got a kick (no pun) out of it and it has the Ivy Intelligensia's knickers all in a twist to boot

        "Despite the teenager’s 4.5 GPA, an SAT score of 2120 and work experience as a U.S. Senate page, she was shunned by Princeton, Yale, Vanderbilt and the University of Pennsylvania."

        To (All) the Colleges That Rejected Me

        http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324000704578390340064578654.html?KEYWORDS=SUZY+LEE+WEISS

        • Depends on the state, Ghost.  Here is what I'm getting at:  gay marriage advocates want to to ensure SS survivor benefits are passed to partners, they want the ability to file married jointly, and they want to not take the hit on inheritances beyond what a hetero couple takes.  Okay fine.  Change the law regarding SS survivorship and go to a flat tax to address the tax code advantages for hetero married couples.  Other things like hospital visitation rights can be reformed just as well without redefining marriage.  I see no reason why any two people should be barred from merging their property and setting up a single domicile.  No problem.  But we know that is not the full extent of what marriage is especially within the religious context.

           Secondly, I read a Mark Steyn column today and he writes that in Canada, where gay marriage is legal, only 1/3 of one percent of marriages in that country are same sex but that isn't the point.  Anything deemed anti-gay is pretty much illegal and what they have there is the old battle about who controls language (in this case the term "marriage") controls the debate. That ensures special rights conferred and a ready-made new protected class.

          http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/344835/vigilance-vigilantes-mark-steyn

          • Exactly SK. Anything can be worked out with contracts and so on. There is no need to redefine marriage. Get the govt very limited say on marriage more about protection of those that need it like children. Protecting children against predators basically but that is elemental. Get rid of tax codes and the benefits crap and this is all going away, but it is about that it is about forcing people to accept these lifestyles and destroying rights to think, rights to speak, rights to dissent peacefully from participating in lifestyles that one does not agree with.

          • Oh, I agree with all that, (already got my daughter in trouble in class after having this conversation with her last Fall, oops) I was just mistaken about the taxes and civil union. Been busy and out of my routine for a week or so, already out of practice.

            I saved 2 articles last week that you all hit on about Oregon, Colorado and guns but from a little different angle. Haven't done much more than scan the recent comments for days, try to get it up there and let you get some skeet in.

        • How does one get a GPA of 4.5? Did they change the number system since I was in high school?

          • If it's like my daughter's hs was, acing AP and college credit (placement) courses is worth just a tad more than acing a "regular" course. I could get 4.0 taking just the state minimums and all gravy electives, hers should be worth more than mine. Looks like she kicked butt.

          • Right Ghosty that's correct. If you take college level classes while in high school that adds to your GPA. And those classes count for college credit so you can finish college faster. My son will start college in the fall but he will already have credits for Biology, Chemistry, Physics, Environmental Science, and Calculus. (I think I'm forgetting something) My son's GPA is higher...just sayin'...ok braggin'

          • Yeah, still doesn't make sense. I took college courses in high school forty years ago but you couldn't do better than an A and you couldn't get higher than a 4.0 GPA.

            What's more, the University of Michigan scoffed at my high school's promise that those courses would count toward my degree. Still pisses me off. Where's Poppa? Turns out I can hold a grudge, too.

          • Same here.. took a bunch of AP, but i never heard about the 4+ GPAs until the 90s.. AP was for college credit, not bonus GPA

          • When my daughter graduated 5 years ago, she had a GPA of 4.0 and a "weighted GPA" of 5.0. The "weight" came from taking all of the AP classes that she could. So, theoretically, someone with a GPA of 4.0 could have gotten several B's if they were in AP classes.

            It's just another symptom of the sick society we live in now. Give the average kids "above average" grades to make them feel better, but then what do we do with the truly above average kids? Conundrum! Seriously, her school had "merit" classes (for the dumb kids), "honors" classes (for the average kids) and "AP" classes for the smart kids. What ever happened to "special ed", "normal" and "honors"? Oh yeah, the PC morons got involved!

          • Many thanks to you all. I lived another year, surprisingly. I NEVER expected to make it this far.

          • Oh man; ham, bacon, and veggies are good, from that pic kinda what I have, (I want the "real" one you have to put outside), but if you figure out how to do turkey in it (I started w/ peanut oil and went from there, still screwing up once a month when I try, good but not 'right'), I'll pay for the details... gonna go settle for a grilled cheese, but if you figure it, please let me know. Oh, and if you want corned beef or pastami that melts in your mouth, you have the cooker to do it while you cruise the webz. Now I'm starving.

          • That's pretty cool, sounds like she has your #, happy belated BD Flash, and I could use that chair & beach towel today, I'm celebrating. Want to LYAO at a crazy flyover guy, you should see me today, like a little kid. It's 76, yes he said 76 degrees and sunny today, woo-hoo, more globull warming please.

          • Yeah, and I still can't believe you guys learned anything at all with all those different aged kids crammed into one little room like that. Amazing.

          • That is what I did in order to get honor roll. I took all of those Advance Placement and college courses and courses designed for those that want to be or are in the honor roll. The GPA went right up to 4.1 or almost 4.2 like that from a 3.0 in a year. I think if anything that really made it possible for me to get into my first choice of college and I was accepted earlier in the year so I didnt have to worry about it by the end of the year like other people around me freaking out that they weren't being accepted and whatever. I actually love them too, I got to do a lot of different stuff and got into a lot of different clubs that I would have never been able to get into and enjoy a lot of privileges and activities. It pays to apply oneself for sure. You guys are bringing me way back and giving me nostalgia and all.

    • This is why I believe that all of that should be outside of the government's control. If I want to give benefits or whatever I want to someone not a spouse I should be able to do that through a will or through powers of attorneys or whatever without the government getting involved. What if I don't like my husband and I dont want him to inherit anything? and why should my heir or heiress so to speak who is not a child nor a spouse be taxed unmercifully? That is insane! Seriously that should be under my control and choice no one else and therefore that would of course extend to all people including of course homosexual pairs.

  • Wow. I would troll boards with that kind of thing, saying that someday maybe my sister and I would be able to come out of the closet (I'm an only child, btw) along with the standard crap, we didn't choose to be this way, it's just how we are. Never dreamed someone would float it for real!

    /Sheesh, I hope I'm not the one RESPONSIBLE for it!

  • This is the embodiment of the slippery slope argument, which explains my reluctance to accept gay marriage.

    • I look at it from another angle. This cretin is attempting to ride on the coattails of an increasingly successful civil rights movement. Its not the fault of that movement, however

      Throw this guy in a hole, for preying on his daughter

      • It may not be the fault per se of the movement but the movement were told that there would be unintended consequences and they did not care. There is a sense of entitlement and selfishness there that I do not appreciate it. They MOCKED any discussion of unintended consequences and said they were hysterical. It is happening now and I assure you, just like the lawsuits of gays towards Christians, things like these you won't see in the media.

      • How exactly can it be increasingly successful some 45 years after "positive discrimination" began?

        Nope, she wasn´t raped or anything, she is guilty also.

        • I mean to say he preyed on the vulnerability of daughters in general, with regards to their fathers.. I suppose she's culpable (i really didn't read it before), but he would receive my wrath first

          By increasingly successful I'm talking about political & legislative achievements, general increase in tolerance for gays, etc. Its a very different world from 45 years ago

      • Problem, though, is every degenerate will ride those coattails. Call it unintended consequences but the result is the same. It is the perfect example of the slippery slope.

        • The wearer of the coat must shake off the degenerate coattail riders then..

          This happens in many things.. While it may be Unintended amongst Consequences, it is also generally Expected. Movements latch onto others just as parasites latch onto hosts (most abstractly, systems often plug-in to other viable systems, when interfaces permit)

        • Another example of a slippery slope is Corporate Greed stealing our gold eventually leading them to outsourcing and stealing our jobs as well.

    • It isn´t just that.

      This is what was intended all along when equal rights for gays came up in the first place.
      The intention was not equal rights, not even extra rights, it is about power.
      Power over a society as a whole, not just by censorship but by lowering said society´s moral standards.

    • Exactly. We are already seeing too many negative results from this social experiment (like the lawsuits against Christians and those that decline to participate due to religious or philosophical dissent).

      • This isn´t just an experiment, it is a deliberate social engineering, demoralize the country as a whole so the special interests and their prostituted politicians can expand the scale of their misdeeds.

  • As long as all parties involved willingly agree, it should be their own decision to make. That's libertarianism.

    • You're a freak. And not all the parties involved willingly agree, because I am sure the Mother and their families are not thrilled by this arrangement.

      • I bet Crowley has a pervert SEE and SAY, and when you pull the string and it's on the little cartoon of his sister it says;

        "And your sister goes oooohhh baby".....

      • No I don't, by my own decision. I wouldn't object to anyone else who chooses to do that though.

        • I knew you were fucked up, just not how fucked up.
          Are you sure you don't live in a trailer park in West Virginia?

          • That´s the thing, for decades the liberals derided rednecks as incestuous (while of course, ignoring it among muzzies).

            Who openly admittes to practicing incest now, huh? Who have supported perversions as "mere sexual orientations"? That´s right.

          • That story (different link) is included in my section on Muslim perversion. It's truly astounding how much perversion there is among Muslims. It's not like it is among the rest of the world's people, where the perverts are rooted out and punished. It's part of the Muslim culture, accepted and apologized for. Fatwas for sodomy, rape victims ordered to marry their rapists, open sex slavery, MILLIONS of first cousin marriages, and endemic sexual abuse of children.
            Scientific research showing the harmful effect of the rampant incestual sex should convince people that yes, there really is something wrong with this religion.

          • If the genetic problems were bad enough to make the breed die out, I'd be all for it. But sadly, it will just make them look like mutants. They already don't think like humans.

          • Think of it as a remake of "The Hills Have Eyes" but in this case the title would be "The Wadis Have Eyes"

        • So family night at the Crowley Farm means you and your sister mud wrestle naked? or maybe mommy and daddy drive down the road to look for little boys to add to the group? Since your graphic farts degree doesn't qualify you with much world experience I can tell you the perverts I have arrested deserved what they got and they always tried to justify it by acting like you. So I guess that means your okay with raping small children and perhaps some of the cuter animals on your little farm? I knew you were sick, I think you just verified what I thought. Again eat feces and expire. If anyone deserved too, it's you

  • Okay, kinda torn on this one. Legally consenting adults in the privacy of their own home. Not a problem.
    But still, she is his DAUGHTER for crying out loud.

    This is where my conservative side clashes with my libertarian side.

    Either way, they are both just friggen SICK!

    • My friend castrated the miniature horse I gave her so that he would not do this sort of thing with the colt he sired. I had a different vision for him and it hurt my feelings, but it was the only thing she could do. The same solution would work here too.

      • Animals act on their urges, Humans are suppose to know better...But in this case the horse you mentioned was smarter than this college professor...:)

    • The issue here is that he probably groomed her to become his lover when she was a child. He is a freak. He is probably a pedophile that just didnt act upon it, but what if he did? She is possibly a very sick bitch and he took advantage of that. There is no way that there is a true equal relationship here. This is taking the Electra thing way too far. Sure they are both adults, but she is his daughter. What if she becomes pregnant? Even if the child survives that child is already messed up before he or she is born. In-breeding adds unnatural genes out into society that creates diseased children of mind and body. What about the Mother the hurt and the pain she must be going through? All other family members? There is too much wrong here. He also has the nerve to equate it to homosexual sex. He is not really seeking privacy for two consenting adults, he is essentially telling us right now that he seeks for this to be accepted and thus not judged by society at large JUST AS the homosexuals are seeking the exact same thing. What's next? Gross...