Drones were circling above U.S. consulate during Libya attack but officials decided NOT to mount a rescue mission. So tell us why a couple of missiles weren’t fired at the terrorists? We’d bet money the one’s left would have boogied out of there in a hurry and perhaps our Ambassador and 3 other Americans would still be alive. The real drones appear to be in Washington, DC. Time for a diaper change. Obama’s is full of crap.
View Comments (5)
"Killed" and "death" are used to describe what happened to our Ambassador.
Why is "assassinated" never used?
It was a politically motivated killing of a US diplomat- but all you ever see is that he was killed. I did a google search and I found no instances where the press says that he was assassinated- google plays the game and pulls up all the articles where he was reported killed.
First they wouldn't call it a terror attack. They blamed it on a YouTube Video. They said he as asphyxiated- as if the mortar attack had nothing to do with it.
Why the fear of using the word 'assassinated'?
Are they afraid it will shed light on the failure of Obama middle east 'policy'? More than ten years after 9/11, after yielding to huge new 'security' encroachments in our lives- why the reluctance to accurately describe the terror attack that assassinated our diplomat?
This is hard, to know where TMI is and enough so it helps you understand what I mean. I don't so much work from home as live where I work, meaning after we buy a house to rehab I move in. I guess technically you could say I'm homeless. Divorced and my girls are grown, so it works.(look at it this way poppa, tool trailer in the drive, and the last room to be finished with a table saw and everything else I could want)
So the 'puter is always on, even if it's sleeping. Add the occasional insomnia, why my time stamps are all over the map. Go get iced tea, check mail.
All that was to say that this was last weeks 'project', meaning maybe an average of 1 hour over any given 24 was spent reading everything I could find on this whole affair, where ever it came from.
Lots of opinions and conflicts in my own mind, but this is both informative (especially if you read between the lines, even if you're only half right) and it was the only thing like it I found. These two guys, man...
http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2012/10/boldly-into-breach-true-story-of-seals.html
"Between the initial firefight at the Main Consulate, and at the annex building, for over two hours they were able to fight back against approximately 200 al-Qaeda terrorists, who pre-planned and coordinated the attack to occur in two stages."
Did you all realize that little "protest" lasted over 2 hours? So many thoughts but I don't do it to broadcast but just digest and file for future, sorry about the book.
Traitorously criminal. Heads should roll big time for this. Americans were unarmed and pleading for help. What ever the motivation to not provide a counter-attack, it is unacceptable. Romney had better hit him hard about this on Monday night.
Further accusation of sedition should be leveled against the MSM! Why do we get this report from the BBC and not our own news services.
Drones circling the Embassy and Obama circling the drain....Kind of metaphoric