Estée Lauder Executive Signs On as Michelle Obama Adviser

Estée Lauder Executive Signs On as Michelle Obama Adviserr: Being a triumph of the photo-shopper’s art the First Lady should hire from Adobe, not Estee Lauder.

This post was last modified on January 26, 2021

Kip Hooker:

View Comments (57)

    • I don't think so, this one is somewhat understandable and doesn't go off on some weird rants about some of the stuff she did, however we must be always vigilant!..:)

  • Moochelle Obama is to "beauty" as Michael Moore is to "handsome".

    Talk amongst yourselves.

    • Both very intelligent people that have their opinions valued - but I guess the looks part is much more important.

        • Michael Moore is intelligent?????????????????? You do have a sense of humor…

          A severely warped sense of humor!

          • Anyone who thinks Michael Moore is intelligent is living a terribly confused life. Moore and Michelle both hate America, but want to stay and reap the benefits.

  • All the comments on here talk about Michelle Obama's ugliness and yet display the most awful ugliness a person can have...the ugliness of being nasty, hurtful, and ignorant. poppajoe49 is right. Ugliness does go to the bone! Too bad you can't recognize the ugliness in yourselves!

    I'm sure all of you all are classy and beautiful enough to judge others, right?

    And how many of the people making these horrible comments consider themselves good upstanding Christians?

    Michelle is known for her class, her intellect, her style, and her compassion. Whether you agree with her politics or not, making statements like the ones above don't make a good representation of whatever party you consider yourself belonging to.

    • It is important for Christians to be truthful. Saying that Michelle is beautiful would be an untrue, and it is not necessarily because of her face or even her body it is because of her attitude and behavior that makes her ugly to people. If she was humble and didn't act like an entitled woman I wouldn't have a problem with her. if she cared enough for her appearance and the appearance of her daughters I wouldn't need to point it out. She could at least try to make sure her daughters look their best at all times. They are representing all of us.

      • I am sure Christ agrees with you that Michelle is ugly because of her "attitude and behavior" - since your judgment is so important to him. You say, "If she was humble" like you have judged that she isn't. I don't see that Michelle acts "entitled" any more than any other first lady. She always dresses very nicely and takes great care with her appearance. Her daughters dress very nicely 99% of the time. Dressing casual occassionally isn't a crime. Maybe you should watch her and read about her on something other than an Obama-hating website to get a different perspective of her.

        If you think you can justify your comments on this board - then so be it. I don't remember Christ saying it was ok to judge people and say mean and hurtful things if it were the "truth".

        That said, your comment on this occassion wasn't as nasty as some. I was mostly talking the mean-spiritedness of most of the comments.

        Such as this one that 10 people "RATED AWESOME!"

        : C_Strasburger June 24, 2013 at 10:01 am
        Rated Awesome! What do you think? 10 0

        What? Now we have a Butt Freaking Ugly Czar (BFUC)? What ever for? And, why the hell are we paying for it?

        Nothing, I mean nothing will ever make that disgusting lard ass heifer approach beauty! Not even Estee Lauder has that power… I mean, you can put lipstick on a pig…but its still a pig…

        ____

        Where you one that rated this comment "awesome" or did you "dislike" the comment?

        No, not one person has "disliked" this comment...yet. I'm about to.

        • My opinions and the opinions of others maybe of no importance to Christ and that is just fine because we are nothing in comparison to Him. All that I am saying is that we have the right to express ourselves and we are speaking the truth as we see it. True that some comments maybe over the top and that is because people just don't like her. Others can defend their points of views. I am just defending my own. If you are just going to troll around here and be angry I suggest you move on to another board that makes you happy. NO one is forcing you to read anything.

          • I'm not angry. I'm sad that people can sit anonymous behind their keyboards and feel "brave" enough to be hateful and mean when most of them would never be that way in real life.

          • No worries, we would have no problem calling the mooch fugly to her face. I, for one type nothing I would not say loud and proud to you, nor any one else in the face.

            Doubt me? If you are ever in my neck of the woods (Germany for now) look me up, I PROMISE I will spit in your eye and voice my opinion. I am sure others here will be happy to provide their contact info, or a general local where you can meet them and tell you exactly how they feel face to face. Just let me know and I will gladly provide a disposable e-mail address so we can make contact and I can keep my word.
            I am sure any of the regulars here will make the same offer.

          • I appreciate that you aren't just a frightened wee little man who feels bigger and more powerful sitting being your keyboard...but you still come across as someone I'm not sure I would want to meet in person...especially if you are going to "spit in my eye". I am really hopeful that you are a much nicer person in real life. You seem to have a lot of hate towards me without knowing me at all. So we disagree on politics. Some of the people who love me disagree with me also. I can honestly say I don't know anyone that hates me in real life. If you would like to communicate with me other than on this board then I will accept your offer - and anyone else's. I'm out for today. Oh, and for whomever said I work for Media Matters - that's funny! I don't know if they were trying to insult me or compliment me. But I don't work in any political capacity. I'm just an "average Joe" who happens to take an interest in political debate.

          • Another turd.

            I'm in the Sacramento area if you want to talk to another one who will say it all in person.

          • I would like to ask what you would say if you were sitting down with me in person?

            As for disliking Bush's Patriot Act...good. But saying that Obama is worse is ridiculous!
            Quote from someone who can say it better than me:
            [Bob Cesca / The Daily Banter]
            Let’s take a look back to the dark ride of the Bush years. In spite of his awesome Wes Anderson-esque artwork, George W. Bush, under the influence of sociopathic neocon warhawks, invaded two nations in the name of fighting terrorism. He committed legions of American soldiers to invade and occupy Iraq under false pretenses and in the complete absence of an exit strategy or a true sense of mission. Because Bush’s defense secretary failed to provide these soldiers with adequate body armor or properly outfitted Humvees, more than 30,000 American soldiers — again, in a war of dubious origins — were either killed or mutilated or psychologically shattered or a combination thereof.
            In the name of fighting terrorism, the Bush administration tortured a wide variety of detainees: an unethical and completely immoral series of war crimes, say nothing of the fact that it’s an ineffectual form of interrogation. Meanwhile, aided by a compliant Congress, the Bush team suspended the civil liberties of Americans when it passed the PATRIOT Act and other fear-mongering policies. And yet the Bush administration failed to capture or kill Bin Laden, and the commander-in-chief who tasked scores of Americans to fight and die for his Cause admitted through a giggling smirk that he doesn’t spend time thinking about getting Bin Laden.
            I could spend vast column inches running through the egregious national security policies of the previous administration, but I think you remember.
            http://thedailybanter.com/2013/02/no-obama-is-not-worse-than-bush-on-national-security/

            I wasn't necessarily saying I like the NSA's policies. I was just pointing out the hypocricy of so many that only now complain when this has been going on for decades and has been defended by many Republicans as a necessary evil in the fight against terrorism!

          • S.T.P. Standard Troll Procedure. Come on, Liberty. Tell us about how Obama's atrocities against the people aren't near as bad as Bush's. Please, be specific.

          • Especially when they come to spout off on another thread, and ignore the ones where they stirred the pot.

          • Troll was happy to come in here and act like it knows something and making points and what not... Flash presented an opportunity to sound intelligent and troll hasn't taken it so not surprised, but I had to point it out. Cause I just love pointing out when trolls come up deficient.

          • Of course, you neglected to mention just exactly HOW Obama isn't spying on American citizens worse than Bush. That WAS your contention, was it not?

          • " I’m sad that people can sit anonymous behind their keyboards"

            Don't worry, the Obama surveillance apparatus can know exactly who we are at any moment it wishes.

          • Ahhhhh the liberal is in full bloom......The smell of manure now fills the air....I have been judged and shall be punished by blogger bell for my crimes against the web. I guess freedom of speech only does work for liberals huh bell?

          • Freedom of speech is a simple concept. I'm sorry you are having a hard time grasping it. It means you can say what you want. It doesn't mean that I have to agree with you. And somehow I'm against freedom of speech because I point that out?

          • But you admit that you did take the comment out of context? And you are so proud of yourself for being so smart! (lol)

            I'd say if you are smelling something it is probably your own lack of a real argument.

          • You must not understand what freedom of speech is. Freedom of speech means you can say anything you want - no matter how thoughtless or ignorant - and I can reply in any way that I want...I prefer intelligent and informed.

            Freedom of speech doesn't mean that I have to agree with you.

          • So we are now thoughtless and ignorant? People have different ways of expressing themselves, some more "Forward" than others, including me when I am passionate about an issue, however you have only come to judge and in the best liberal manner point out how ignorant and stupid we are (those are your own words) and you now are up to defending your talking points within a day of arriving. Your one of the reasons the republic is in trouble, you are now indicating you are smarter, and know much more than the people here, who under the constitution have just as much right to express themselves as you do, but because you are liberal, you are therefore ordained by some higher power to be smarter and more knowledgeable. I prefer the people here to you, they may be edgier, sometimes profane, but they are people whose opinion I respect, you on the other hand have just arrived with a paper of talking points and the belief that yours is the only way, sounds almost like Islam to me, perhaps next we will be re-educated? But remember in your words, I must not understand what freedom of speech is, I don't know the first amendment was written so only liberals could understand and interpret it.

          • Who is expecting you to agree? Personally I kind of enjoy the fact that you are a hypocrite. I wouldn't change that about you for the world.

          • He doesn't seem to like being held to the same standards he wants for everybody else. Typical moonbat.

          • You must not understand what freedom of speech is. Freedom of speech means you can say anything you want – no matter how thoughtless or ignorant – and I can reply in any way that I want…I prefer intelligent and informed.

            Freedom of speech doesn’t mean that I have to agree with you.

          • Took the words right out of my computer...With the amount of spying this administration is doing they probably have your picture on file, next to all your posts, when you disagree with "Dear Leader".

            The anonymous behind the keyboard seems to work well for the Bell also, who is complaining about us doing the very same thing he/she/it is doing, being internet brave I guess.

          • "The anonymous behind the keyboard seems to work well for the Bell also, who is complaining about us doing the very same thing he/she/it is doing, being internet brave I guess."

            Ha, now that is a good point.

          • I'm not sitting behind my keyboard using nasty phrases to insult people or acting like an adolescent schoolgirl who thinks it is funny to be mean-spirited.

            As for spying...this has been going on for years. Remember who created the Patriot Act? Where was your outrage then?

          • Exactly Flash, I was no fan of the Patriot act, even though under Bush, it wasn't being used as extensively, or to spy on everyday Americans that aren't contacting suspected terrorists, which is happening now under Obama.

          • As liberal trolls so often do, Number Seven here has taken the liberty of assuming that anyone who disagrees with Dear Leader was a fan of Bush. Not true, not at all. I expressed much displeasure at the "Patriot Act." Now that Obama has taken it to unheard of heights, I express even more.

            By the way, we didn't start bringing up Michelle's physical ugliness and lack of class until liberals in the media started shouting how awesome she looked in all her multi-thousand dollar outfits. Just another way of expressing our hatred of the media.

  • And how many million is this attempt at putting lipstick on a Wookie going to cost the taxpayers? The butt ugly Marxist sow will never learn that money dosen't buy class.

    • THAT is the point!
      If she were as beautiful as a Victoria's Secret model, she would still be ugly underneath.
      Remember, Beauty is skin deep, but ugly goes to the bone!

  • Let them eat cake while I vacation and spend millions! For less than a buck Moochelle could have gotten a paper bag and cut two eye holes in it, problem solved.

    • Hell, I'd donate my time for free to set the cow up with a whole weeks worth of bags. If she had a fancy event to go to, her daughters could dress up her bag w/some Elmer's glue and glitter.

        • Yes, yes, the smug is strong with this one. Lighten up! Why are liberals so obnoxiously hypocritical? Like asking why birds fly and fish swim, I guess.

  • What? Now we have a Butt Freaking Ugly Czar (BFUC)? What ever for? And, why the hell are we paying for it?

    Nothing, I mean nothing will ever make that disgusting lard ass heifer approach beauty! Not even Estee Lauder has that power... I mean, you can put lipstick on a pig...but its still a pig...

  • Okay, let me be the first to say it.
    The wookie needs all the fashion help she can get, and please do try to spare a few minutes for the girls also.

    • Seriously the girls need to get the hair done, the clothes need to change and the older one probably needs to start wearing some makeup because damn. Michelle she looks whack most of the time, it just isn't right and all in all she can keep it simple. Mrs. Bush kept it simple, she was no glamour girl and so were her daughters they kept it simple, pretty and moving there is nothing wrong with that.

      • Honestly, since she doesn't have the excuse of advanced age, Moochelle might just be the ugliest First Lady in history. That is only because Helen Thomas or Bella Abzug were never First Lady.

Related Post
  1. DALLAS POLICE SHOOTING: ‘ZOMBIE APOCALYPSE ASSAULT VEHICLE AND TROOP TRANSPORT’
  2. Kim Jong-un was a child prodigy
  3. Top GOP Leader Promises Total Amnesty In 2015