Do they award Pulitzer Prizes for “Headline of the Year”? If they do, we’d like to say, “Thank you. Thank you very much.”
But let’s get on with the story from the Seattle Times:
Three bisexual men are suing a national gay-athletic organization, saying they were discriminated against during the Gay Softball World Series held in the Seattle area two years ago.
The three Bay Area men say the North American Gay Amateur Athletic Alliance in essence deemed them not gay enough to participate in the series.
Not gay enough? Please explain.
The three plaintiffs — Steven Apilado, LaRon Charles and Jon Russ — played on a team called D2 that qualified for the 2008 Gay Softball World Series, which is organized by the alliance.
The alliance’s rules say that each World Series team can have no more than two heterosexual players. According to the lawsuit, a competing team accused D2 of violating that rule.
Each of the three plaintiffs was called into a conference room in front of more than 25 people, and was asked “personal and intrusive questions” about his sexual attractions and desires, purportedly to determine if the player was heterosexual or gay, the lawsuit alleges. The alliance has no category or definition for bisexual or transgender people in its rules, the plaintiff’s attorney said.
At one point during the proceedings, the lawsuit alleges, one of the plaintiffs was told: “This is the Gay World Series, not the Bisexual World Series.”
The alliance ruled the three men were “nongay,” stripped D2 of its second-place finish and recommended that the three players be suspended from participating in the World Series for a year, according to the suit.
The men are asking for $75,000 each for emotional distress. They’re also seeking to invalidate the alliance’s findings on the men’s sexual orientations and to reinstate D2’s second-place World Series finish.
Can’t we all just get along? After all, this is the only softball league in the world where every player looks forward to getting a groin pull. Where the squeeze plays happen in the dugout. Where every player wants to take one for the team. Where every player hits to the opposite field. Where the third base coach has a special sign for poking one up the middle. And, finally, where the manager has trouble putting together a line-up because half the players want to pitch and the other half want to catch.
Did we leave anything out?
Source: Seattle Times
This post was last modified on April 22, 2010


View Comments (10)
I don't get how you can't be "gay enough" to compete if you are merely bisexual. They were talking about this story on Opie & Anthony (keep that in mind) this week, & Anthony's opinion was if you sucked 1, you have sucked 100, it did'nt matter. He thought, & I agree, that these guys should not have been stripped of their 2nd place finish. I can't believe that bisexuals ain't gay enough for gays, because I gotta think that they would have sex with a bisexual man, but they can't softball against him? Something does'nt make sense here.
There an inclusive bunch if you are gay enough.
no hard balls allowed onthe soft ball team
Very clever.
Uhm... I thought homosexuals were all about inclusiveness and togetherness and equality and acceptance.
Baseball terms to build jokes around :
on deck
pinch hitter
hit and run
double play
3 unassisted (for those of you scoring at home) <---see what I did there?
popout
line drive
tater
6-4-3
frozen rope
blooper
That's a start. Have fun. :)
"choke up on the bat" has a whole different meaning.
Isn't that New York's naked cowboy?
That is the first thing that came to my mind when I saw that picture, then I noticed all the pink and I was like uhm... gay naked cowboy is more like it.
Brokeback Baseball