Gov’t Tells Texas Rancher His Land No Longer Belongs to Him — He Knew It Was Serious When He Claims Official Said These Six Words

Gov’t Tells Texas Rancher His Land No Longer Belongs to Him — He Knew It Was Serious When He Claims Official Said These Six Words. They might as well have said “You’re so beyond fucked it’s unbelievable.” He should claim adverse possession.

This post was last modified on January 26, 2021

CO2Insanity: Tired of the CO2 BS and all the other BS in the US and the world.

View Comments (53)

  • They guy has a properly executed deed proving ownership. If this was "always" federal land, I demand to see the paperwork that proves Federal ownership, not only of the land everyone imo ws a b out, but the gadditional land the governmwnt is now claiming. It should includecall thesurvey maps, etc. Given that Texas has only been a state for around 150 years, and the rancher's mily has owned it for generations, I suspect thevFederal government can't producevany of those documents.

  • "the process for determining what happens to the disputed land is lengthy and complex" and I have no doubt that it always ends in favor of the feds.

  • Am I the only one who has noticed that these massive land grabs have accelerated under Quagmire? Also the way the EPA has determined that any body of water on your property is under their control. Nice knowing the government can grab your property for having an unregulated mud puddle on it.

    • Because, the uncoordinated, little, metrosexual, wants to know what it feels like to be a tough guy.

  • OK, this is nuts!
    NOBODY WON POWERBALL!!!
    The next jackpot is $1.3 BILLION!!!
    Therefore, I foresee the goobermint raiding the Powerball offices, and taking the money, to be "redistributed" among the "poor".

    • I don't waste money on lottery very often but I bought a ticket for tomorrows drawing! Some people around here think I'm an asshole now? They ain't seen nothing yet!

    • All I want is a mil off the top, and I'll go about my b'ness anonymously. If anyone DOES win a freakin' billion dollars, their lives will be RUINED. Unless they give most away to decent charities.

      • If I win a billion, I will drop off the face of the Earth.
        No phone, no forwarding address, nothing.
        I'll be living on a Caribbean island, and nobody will know where.
        Charities will be direct donations, and of my own choosing.
        Anyone else will either get a check in the mail, or won't hear from me.

        • LOL that is hilarious because I would do a mixture of not being easily accessible while at the same time being pretty active in the real world. I will live it up (responsibly and conservatively) while getting my family (and others) out of poverty through proper use of capitalism. However, I won't be easily accessible either, I will do A LOT of background/shadow work/plays. Things will get done, but nobody needs to know I did them or was involved.

        • I hear Belize is nice this time of year. Or ANY time of year, for that matter! If Killary manages to wiggle yer fat ass through the White House doors next January, I'm gonna be sorely tempted to live out the rest of my days on a Belizean beach...

    • They will... they are taking 50%-70% from the top. The winner(s) will never see that entire amount.

  • Ever notice things like this only happen when we have a Democrat president?
    Remember Ruby Ridge, Montana and Waco?

    • Then a Republican or Independent President should have gotten Congress to act upon these issues a long time ago so there would have been no disputes... This is a serious problem!

    • The pope of all democrat party bullies, Obama, sends his democrat party cardinals, the government agency workers, to bully and steal from hapless citizens. This bullying makes democrats feel good. It is why they crave power, so they can bully more.

  • For the umpteenth time hereon I ask yet again: how does all of this federal hubris not end in civil war?

    I'd prefer ballots over bullets.

    • By law, the government isn't allowed to own as much land as they already claim, so why do they need more? What do they have against ranchers that feed us?
      This is why those guys are holding the building on the Federal Wildlife Refuge in Oregon.

      • Actually, they are protesting a neighbor being charged with starting a fire that travelled to public lands. The don't seem to prosecute people responsible for huge forest fires, so why these 2?

        • The main point is the two had already been to court, sentenced then served their time. A federal prosecutor got his panties in a twist and decided to charge the Hammonds again and found a liberal dipwad for a judge to go along with him. Now they are back in prison, serving a second sentence for the same crime they already served a sentence for. Any way you look at it this is wrong and it is the federal governments doing.

      • Ok...okay so this is what I wanted to know... The Federal Government is not entitled to land... or at least not to an extravagant amount so indeed why are they doing this? I don't believe in this nonsense that the land was ALWAYS federal just not managed and now they are looking into it... what are they going to do with that land ESPECIALLY since they shouldn't be having it in the first place?

      • By law... you lost me there... this is the Obama headed progressive junta which operates above the law.