StrinaM says it best:
With one caveat. If I was dating, and knew my gf was like ol’ Sandy there, I’d have a good reason to get the ol’ snip snip, save her a few bucks.
This post was last modified on October 29, 2012
- perlcat in News New Format
StrinaM says it best:
With one caveat. If I was dating, and knew my gf was like ol’ Sandy there, I’d have a good reason to get the ol’ snip snip, save her a few bucks.
This post was last modified on October 29, 2012
This website uses cookies.
View Comments (10)
The only possible bright spot I can see from this is hopefully that stupid Slut Fluke will never procreate and contaminate the gene pool with more like her.
If Sandra is correct, liberals don't want to have children. Children are an obstacle, a distraction, an impediment on the liberal woman's path to political and economic success. It's tough to be a successful progressive politician or business woman when you're changing diapers or wiping runny noses. So it appears Fluke agrees with Obama---women shouldn't be "punished" with unwanted children---or any children at all.
I favor this philosophy, more liberals having fewer children means fewer voting liberals in the future.
Unfortunately, many "women" like her eventually do have children, and they turn into the absolutely worst parents. Either helicoptering around desperate to prove how they can be the most informed, most perfect parent, or shoving the kid off on a nanny and just pulling them out for display. If she has kids, I bet you a buck she will pull a Jolie - and deliberately make the kid act gay! It would be so important to her to look "enlightened" that she would absolutely twist the kids head, rewarding them for gender trait-swapping. She is a selfish, narcissistic know-it-all (who really knows very little). I truly hope, for her potential children's sake, that she keeps sucking down those pills.
Otherwise, expect to see another Lena Dunham in about 20 years!
Eventually they will eliminate themselves, a generation from now...I like it.
I wonder if anyone ever mentioned to her that they have the ol' snip snip for women, too?
Was Cyndi Lauper singing about Sandra Fluke?
Madonna certainly wasn't once upon a time when she was relevant.
I refuse to claim her as one of my gender. She is clearly an alternative creature. These stupid feminists - there has been so much evidence and research to prove that they were wrong in the 60's & 70's - but they are the epitome of bitter clingers. Because they WANT it to be true, it's good enough for them.
Thing Fluke, please shut your mouth and scurry under the rocks from whence you came. You are not relevant, and you do not speak for most women.
1. There is no credible proof to prove it is a female.
2. Even if it is a female, I'm betting it's a lesbian. I can't see myself getting "excited" by it, even with the little blue pill.
She's not just your regular ol' "bitter clinger", she's a "harry clinger".
The amount of damage these trolls do for young impressionable women in terms of relationships, life, and everything is incalculable. What they want is fine as a personal choice for themselves -- by all means, I believe that she shouldn't reproduce. However, so far as how she feels other women should live their lives? Like the original Puritans, she just can't tolerate the fact that somewhere, somehow, some woman is enjoying their life in a non-feminista way, and THIS. MUST. STOP.