Hillary book bombs

HardChoices.jpg


In spite of media fawning, Hillary’s book bombs. Simon & Schuster printed and shipped one million copies of the book prior to its release date. They were “hoping and praying” to sell at least 150,000 the first week. They sold 60,000.

This post was last modified on January 26, 2021

J.P. Travis: Born and raised in Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1976 graduate of University of Michigan, father, grandfather, husband, founder and CEO of Travelyn Publishing (http://www.travelynpublishing.com/), and passionate anti-government believer in individual liberty.

View Comments (64)

  • Oh sweet bleedin jeebus it's back. The Trolling Dead. Haha, the ironic thing is that more people are gonna read Livvy's juvenile prattling here than are ever gonna read Chairman Hillary's propaganda piece.

      • Psycho, you "hear" a lot of things that aren't so. Maybe you need to get back on that medication, and those voices will settle down. ;>)

          • It's already discounted to $16.99
            http://www.bookdip.com/ebook-deals/2014/06/02/hard-choices-hillary-rodham-clinton/
            And even Amazon has it for $14.99!
            http://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/1476751447/ref=tmm_hrd_new_olp_sr?ie=UTF8&condition=new&sr=&qid=
            THAT ought to end the discussion, because as we all know from past experience, the scrunt won't reply to the post once it has been shown that it is wrong.
            Followed by denial, "I don't have time to search all the emails I get to look for your specific post".

          • Poopajoe. you're a riot, pretending to want to avoid me, and then actively daring me to respond to your silliness.

            So you found the book discounted on Amazon and something called "Bookdip"? You don't spend much time buying books, do you? If you did, you'd realize that it's SOP for big book outlets to offer best sellers at 30% off. That's still a far cry from Rose's "belief" that Bookbub (or whatever it was that she googled up) was selling it for $2.99.

            Incidentally, I asked a question that none of you have yet had the guts to answer: What's it to you if Hillary Clinton's book sells well or poorly? What possible difference would it make to your right wing world either way?

            You can't answer that question, can you?

    • Clinton added: "There's no doubt terrorists were involved." and they are still in the WH.

  • hmm maybe now the TSA will ban it on Airplanes and the ATF will arrest her for unlicensed production of crap.

          • You strike me as more the Diaper Dave Vitter type, Jim. Or perhaps Wide Stance Craig. I'll bet they've got some kinky stories!

          • REALLY? The person who went off with tirades about people saying they bet about something, is now using "I bet"?
            Could it be yet another phony leftist using the name of her stupidity?

          • Context, Poopajoe, context.

            THere's nothing wrong with saying "I'll bet" in casual conversation. It becomes dishonest, though, when you try to use "I'd be willing to bet" as evidence supporting your position in an argument.

            But, hey, if you have reason to believe that Wide Stance and Diaper Dave DON'T have kinky stories, feel free to say why. I'm just speaking from what I've heard about them in the media. Maybe you know them better than I do?

          • Sorry, I'm not fascinated by men's bathroom habits.
            Maybe you should consider a different hobby.

          • I looked at a copy of the book at Barnes & Noble and I didn't seen any introduction by Monica Lewinsky. Maybe she didn't write an introduction for the printed book. Maybe she only contributed an oral introduction for the eBook version.

          • I'd never put something like that on a Kindle, it would leave a permanent stain.

          • I'm sure you DO believe it, Rose. As I said to someone else here, you tend to believe a whole lot of things that aren't so.

            Incidentally, what's it to you if Hillary Clinton's book sells well? In what way does that hurt you or anyone else?

  • A 14 million dollar advance? Steven King doesn't get that much, and he's sold more books than anyone in the last 40 years. She must be counting on no one bringing this up when she starts in on the "income inequality" phase of the campaign.

    • WHere in the world are you getting the notion that those who criticize "income inequality" are opposed to very famous, very talented or very celebrated individuals being offered (or receiving) large payments for their services?

      The idea of "income inequality" is that it's wrong for the rich to get richer on the backs of the working poor. Show me how it's hurting an underpaid clerk at WalMart for Hillary Clinton to accept a large advance for a book the publishers very much want to publish.

      In short, it isn't. What DOES hurt that underpaid clerk is when wealthy business owners and investors choose to underpay their employees, thereby obliging the taxpayers to provide supplemental support.

      See how much trouble you get into when you depend on the right wing media for your information about us liberals, instead of coming directly to us and asking what we believe?

      • Yawn..snore....zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz same shit, same shithead..different day....I was hoping you were dead....

        • If you truly hoped I was dead, just to avoid message board confrontations with me, then you're taking political discussion WAY too seriously, Silent.

          Want to silence me? Offer a good rebuttal to one of my posts. Or offer a good argument to support the issue being discussed. Insults are cheap and serve no purpose.

    • I don't get it either. That's an enormous advance. According to the link, they don't expect to get any of it back, and I don't understand why not. Who would give a Clinton that much money without some clauses that demand certain performance levels?

      Add this inexplicable advance to the inexplicably large salary Chelsea was getting for sounding like a high school reporter on NBC News. It seems that media corporations are essentially gifting the Clintons with enormous amounts of money... in expectation of what? Are these advance bribes based on the assumption that Hillary will be the next president?

      • Of course, you never asked these questions when Mama Grizzly used her political pull to get cushy jobs for her decidedly unexceptional (and uneducated) daughter Bristol, did you?

        As for the rest of your suspicions, Clinton has had a very interesting and colorful life, and is also the frontrunner for the 2016 presidential election. Are you really so sheltered as not to understand why a publisher would LOVE to get the contract for her book?---and would pay a great deal to keep some other publishing house from getting it first?

      • Did Bill Clinton divert any tax dollars to Simon & Schuster when he was president? This could be a payback, and a tax deduction, all in one neat package.

        • It's so funny watching you guys try to come up with all sorts of wild speculations, in your efforts to convince each other that a contract with Hillary Clinton isn't of vast interest to the publishing industry. :>D

          In fact, you're struggling so hard to discredit her that it becomes VERY obvious to any onlookers that she's a force to be reckoned with. If she weren't, you wouldn't care what she wrote or who published it.

      • That and/or the libs in corporate America are paying a combination of tribute and protection money to the Democrats in general and the Clinton's in particular.

  • I saw we take the other 940,000 copies and in one giant humanitarian gesture we ship them to Venezuela to be used as emergency toilet paper.

    • Oh, absolutely, Silent. You know as well as I do that the only prayer the Republicans have in 2016 is if they can silence (and/or lie about) the competition.

      I can understand exactly why you want Hillary Clinton's books to be spirited out of the country. ;>)

  • IMHO, Hillary is not going to be the progressive-fascist presidential candidate. We are going to have our first Indian-woman-fascist presidential candidate, Warren.

          • How funny. Not one of you can come up with any concrete criticisms of the woman, her policies or her qualifications, so instead you let loose with a bunch of racially charged insults.

            Tell me, since you seem to think so little of Hillary Clinton or Elizabeth Warren....which Republican do you think has what it takes to defeat either one of them? Not just by hoodwinking the right, mind you, but by attracting the middle-of-the-roaders.
            Got any ideas?

            Back in 2012, I remember some of you were waxing ecstatic over Herman Cain (mainly because, as you said, you couldn't wait to yell "RACIST!" at any liberals who criticized him). How'd he work out for you?

          • Hey livvy! How was France. good to see we can count on stupid, lying trolls to just keep turning up, bad pennies that they are!

          • Thank you, Rose. The mere fact that none of you have refuted anything I posted here has nothing to do with it, right? I'm a "lying troll" because you say I am, just as Saddam Hussein had WMDs because the Bush administration said so. ;>)

            In answer to your question, France is always great. But this year I went to Turkey instead.

          • She lied about being a Cherokee. That makes her a liar. And she used that lie to acquire a job she wasn't otherwise qualified for. That makes her a fraudster. Now, she advocates for communist government policies. That makes her a potential despot.

            So she's a lying fraudulent despot. Specific enough for you?

            Now here's a question for you: did you enjoy her cookbook of Native American recipes, which she stole from other authors?

          • Oh, my stars and garters, a politician LIED!!! Hand me the smelling salts! :>D

            Come on, JP. Do you actually have evidence that she wouldn't otherwise have gotten that job? Or are you just assuming, because every right wing red meat eater knows that a woman with Indian ancestry couldn't possibly have been a superior candidate?

            As for the Indian ancestry thing: so what? Lots of family stories are handed down, and I'll bet you've even got a few in your family. Mine? I supposedly have a royal Turkish ancestor. My great great great grandparents said so. Just because I look about as Anglo-Saxon as Peter O'Toole doesn't mean it's a lie, nor does it necessarily follow that that's how I got into college.

            Now that we've got that settled, if you're that bothered by lying politicians, why didn't you care that Cheney lied that he "would have been happy to serve" in Vietnam? Or that Bush lied us into a terribly expensive (and not yet paid for) disaster in Iraq, with terrible longterm consequences for us, the Middle East and the world? Or that Herman Cain lied about his sexual shenanigans? Or that Rumsfeld lied about how long the Iraq war would last? Nah---let's just let those slide, and focus ALL our attention and outrage on ELIZABETH WARREN SAID SHE HAS CHEROKEE ANCESTRY BUT WON'T PROVE IT TO US!!!!!!

            You're awfully selective in your morality, JP. Shoot, FOX News lies to you 24/7, but that doesn't seem to bother you one iota.

          • "Come on, JP. Do you actually have evidence that she wouldn’t otherwise have gotten that job?"

            Yes. The evidence is all over the Internet. You will never see it unfortunately because you would have to leave the MSNBC website for a minute.

          • So show me the evidence.

            Mind you, I'm not talking about screechy Breitbart accusations or FOX News insinuations. I want to see evidence.

            Or I'm afraid I'll just have to accuse YOU of being a liar, and, consider how outraged you claim to be over such things, that might be very traumatic for you.

            Waiting for that "evidence"................

          • What? Two thumbs-down ratings so far, but no evidence? Even though the evidence is supposedly "all over the Internet"?

            I'm shocked, I tell you! ;>)

      • President Walking Eagle Warren...now in Indian lore that is a tern used for a bird so full of crap it can not fly.....

        • President Walking Shitbird?
          President Walking Tern Turd?
          President Walking Shit for Brains? No, we have that one now.

          Here's hoping we don't have another shitty president for quite some time.