Hillary Clinton for the Democratic Nomination. This doesn’t come from us, it’s the New York Times editorial board again today. Read the below and tell us it doesn’t make you wonder what they were smoking this morning.
Voters have the chance to choose one of the most broadly and deeply qualified presidential candidates in modern history.
Qualified at what? Having an illegal server with illegal above top secret emails residing on it and lying her ass off about it? Perhaps having people donate money to the Clinton Foundation while she was Secretary of State in return for “favors?”
In our opinion the only thing she’s “qualified” for is jail.
View Comments (24)
They really meant " Voters have the chance to choose one of the most broadly criminal and deeply corrupt presidential candidates in modern history"
I totally see the NYT's point. If you are a propaganda arm of the democrat party. If you systematically support and applaud the lying and corruption and perversion the democrats bring to government. If your organization makes a living feeding democrat party BS to useful idiots, and is anxious to kiss the ass of every party leader. If you believe government cannot be too big or too intrusive. If you are sure know better how to run people's lives then they can themselves. If you practice yellow journalism. Then yes, Hilary is the one you would endorse.
She deserves it because: She lost her way when she was young and there was no going back, she married a disgusting whore and enabled his whoredom, she (probably) murdered people, she is a wicked person who wants power and glory because she waited too long to get it as she was helping others get it, so it is her turn... I mean the black guy took it last time and that wasn't fair she is after all a vagina wielder/holder and that should have been enough. I am sure that we can come up with many other reasons why she deserves the democratic nomination and indeed the Presidency of the US.
Leadership? Kinda sideways but...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WjWDrTXMgF8
Monica Lewinsky was "deeply" qualified......Hitlery, not so much....
And her is the laying lard ass at her best...
http://wiredrightcommentary.blogspot.com/2016/01/clinton-speak-more-buffalo-squat-from.html
Do these brain dead fvckers ever read any of the shit they shovel out in that "Gray Lady" POS rag they pander?
Hey!! What happened to my Smiling and waving Obama in traditional Arabic garb gravatar?!?!? WHISKEY TANGO FOXTROT?? OVER!!
Dunno, but the sleep demons have been rampant for over two days here, it's 3 a.m. & I'd love to see it... ;) Couldn't help it but I am so tired, please accept my drinking a canned pint sleeping pill in your honor instead of making my magic pancakes. Hope it works.
No, that's fine and if you see my lazy gravatar while you're drinking, tell him to get ass back to work!
It's come to this, people. The party that derides the right as the party of old white people are pushing two old white people for president. One is an incompetent self avowed socialist moron and the other is a corrupt, incompetent moron with arguably fewer qualifications than 0blahblah other than her misogynist hubby already holding the office.
I don't believe everything Trump is selling but wild horses couldn't haul me off to vote for those two and I have plenty of reservations about Cruz and Rubio.
We're fvcked, folks.
Is it any wonder that the rag is going under and floundering like a fish that is on the bank.
Hildabeast has done nothing on her own except permit 4 Americans to die in Benghazi. She had done nothing except expose those who are operating under the cloak of secrecy to the possibility of death.
the most broadly and deeply qualified..............felon in politics.
Perhaps even the most qualified to spend the rest of her life in prison.
Treason still carries the death penalty, doesn't it?
If it doesn't, it damn well should.
The comments were as bad as the article. I think I threw up in my mouth a little bit...