Hillary Clinton for the Democratic Nomination. This doesn’t come from us, it’s the New York Times editorial board again today. Read the below and tell us it doesn’t make you wonder what they were smoking this morning.

Voters have the chance to choose one of the most broadly and deeply qualified presidential candidates in modern history.

Qualified at what? Having an illegal server with illegal above top secret emails residing on it and lying her ass off about it? Perhaps having people donate money to the Clinton Foundation while she was Secretary of State in return for “favors?”

In our opinion the only thing she’s “qualified” for is jail.

24
Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment
13 Comment threads
11 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
17 Comment authors
flashingscotsmanProgressive HemrrhoidMissile CommandKimmyQueenGhostntheMachine Recent comment authors

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  Subscribe  
Notify of
Progressive Hemrrhoid
Member
Progressive Hemrrhoid

They really meant ” Voters have the chance to choose one of the most broadly criminal and deeply corrupt presidential candidates in modern history”

Missile Command
Member
Missile Command

I totally see the NYT’s point. If you are a propaganda arm of the democrat party. If you systematically support and applaud the lying and corruption and perversion the democrats bring to government. If your organization makes a living feeding democrat party BS to useful idiots, and is anxious to kiss the ass of every party leader. If you believe government cannot be too big or too intrusive. If you are sure know better how to run people’s lives then they can themselves. If you practice yellow journalism. Then yes, Hilary is the one you would endorse.

KimmyQueen
Member

She deserves it because: She lost her way when she was young and there was no going back, she married a disgusting whore and enabled his whoredom, she (probably) murdered people, she is a wicked person who wants power and glory because she waited too long to get it as she was helping others get it, so it is her turn… I mean the black guy took it last time and that wasn’t fair she is after all a vagina wielder/holder and that should have been enough. I am sure that we can come up with many other reasons why she deserves the democratic nomination and indeed the Presidency of the US.

GhostntheMachine
Member
GhostntheMachine

Leadership? Kinda sideways but…

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WjWDrTXMgF8

Not so silent
Member
Not so silent

Monica Lewinsky was “deeply” qualified……Hitlery, not so much….

And her is the laying lard ass at her best…
http://wiredrightcommentary.blogspot.com/2016/01/clinton-speak-more-buffalo-squat-from.html

hisham
Member
hisham

Do these brain dead fvckers ever read any of the shit they shovel out in that “Gray Lady” POS rag they pander?

hisham
Member
hisham

Hey!! What happened to my Smiling and waving Obama in traditional Arabic garb gravatar?!?!? WHISKEY TANGO FOXTROT?? OVER!!

GhostntheMachine
Member
GhostntheMachine

Dunno, but the sleep demons have been rampant for over two days here, it’s 3 a.m. & I’d love to see it… 😉 Couldn’t help it but I am so tired, please accept my drinking a canned pint sleeping pill in your honor instead of making my magic pancakes. Hope it works.

hisham
Member
hisham

No, that’s fine and if you see my lazy gravatar while you’re drinking, tell him to get ass back to work!

Dave K
Member
Dave K

It’s come to this, people. The party that derides the right as the party of old white people are pushing two old white people for president. One is an incompetent self avowed socialist moron and the other is a corrupt, incompetent moron with arguably fewer qualifications than 0blahblah other than her misogynist hubby already holding the office.

I don’t believe everything Trump is selling but wild horses couldn’t haul me off to vote for those two and I have plenty of reservations about Cruz and Rubio.

We’re fvcked, folks.

deepthinker
Member
deepthinker

Is it any wonder that the rag is going under and floundering like a fish that is on the bank.

Hildabeast has done nothing on her own except permit 4 Americans to die in Benghazi. She had done nothing except expose those who are operating under the cloak of secrecy to the possibility of death.

poppajoe49
Guest
poppajoe49

the most broadly and deeply qualified…….…….felon in politics.
Perhaps even the most qualified to spend the rest of her life in prison.

bluesjunky
Member
bluesjunky

Treason still carries the death penalty, doesn’t it?

flashingscotsman
Member

If it doesn’t, it damn well should.

BobontheJob
Member

The comments were as bad as the article. I think I threw up in my mouth a little bit…

jukin
Member
jukin

Hillary for prison 2016!!!
Jukin Times

Dave K
Member
Dave K

“Broadly and deeply qualified”, LMFAO. She would be even worse than 0bama and I’m no fan of 0bama. Plus, liberals would eventually come to despise her because she is further towards the center than he is and he lost some of their support because he wasn’t liberal enough. Some of them see him as a foreign country/corporate a$$ ki$$er, well what do you think Hilliary is, idiots?

She’s a fundamentally clueless liar and fraud that accomplished nothing as a senator after “adopting” NY as her home state because it’s one of the most liberal states and she had a better chance of winning a seat there than in Arkansas. She only stuck quietly with Bill after Monicagate because she had her own political ambitions. She was waxed by essentially a nobody in 2008, was a disaster as SoS, a corrupt lying b!tch whose husband’s actions while in office helped bring down the economy and create the TBTF banks.

Wake the F up, NYT editorial board morons. Print media has already lost most of it’s credibility and is going the way of the dinosaurs, don’t accelerate the process.

Ugh.

bluesjunky
Member
bluesjunky

So I can put you down as a “maybe” for voting for Hillary?

Dave K
Member
Dave K

I wouldn’t vote for Hilliary if you held a .50 caliber sniper rifle to my head. Now, hold one to her head and maybe we can talk. 😉

JPTravis
Member

Wouldn’t you love to have had a listening device in those editorial meetings? How in the world do they justify endorsing Hillary Clinton? Or maybe they didn’t try to justify it. Maybe those meetings were spent trying to figure out how to sell this without looking like idiots.

whiskeyriver
Member
whiskeyriver

They look like idiots any way they try to spin things to help Shillery. I think the Slimes editors know it and just don’t care.

Dave K
Member
Dave K

Because the NYT, otherwise known as the gray lady is a liberal rag. If I read anything there that even marginally contradicts liberal policies, I have to do a double take and smack my face a couple of times to make sure I’m actually seeing it. Those instances are far and few between.

Trickie
Member
Trickie

She is one of the most broad

Joe Redfield
Member
Joe Redfield

…and the most deeply committed to never, under any circumstances, telling the truth about anything.