If Healthcare Law Is A Tax Is It Now Invalid?

If Healthcare Law Is A Tax Is It Now Invalid? It seems that we remember something in civics class about Article 1, Section 7 that prohibits taxes from originating in the Senate. It also seems that we remember Obamacare originating in the Senate. So the question is . . . does that render any or all of this bill invalid? We won’t hold our breath though. The Constitution prohibits a majority of the things those in government do, which is why they’ve learned how to ignore it.

This post was last modified on June 29, 2012

Kip Hooker:

View Comments (19)

  • But, from the same article,

    "procedurally is that, now that the mandate’s officially a “tax,” it falls squarely within the parameters of budgetary matters than can be dealt with in the Senate via reconciliation. That means the GOP will only need 51 votes to get rid of it, not 60."

    Now, all we need to do is elect a few more Tea Party Senators,.................

  • The Senate took a House Bill, gutted it, and threw in Obamacare... which means they *KNEW* it was a tax and wanted to be prepared if this came up, so they *LIED* to the American people. Open/Shut case.

  • This is the reason why (most) Forefathers and Framers wanted LESS goverment and simple laws. Why the heck do we complicate ourselves?

  • I wish that this where true. It is not, the POS started in the House, it didnt pass so what Reid did was re-work it and send it through the sent. So the technicality of it not starting in the house is not true.

    With Thursday ruling it doesn't really matter. Roberts looked for away to call it a damn tax and find it. Hell, I can find a gold bar if I look at a piece of iron long enough, or spray paint it gold.

    I've heard pundits claim that Roberts is also the keeper of the court. That is BULL SHIT. He is supposed to be the keeper of the Constitution of the United States of America. Putting faith in the SCOTUS has always been iffy at best. McCain/Feingold is one example that I can site. Roe v Wade is another.

    I’ve also heard that due to Gore v Bush Roberts felt he could not make the decision upon party lines, which is wrong too. So why did the conservative have to fall in line with the liberal section of the court? Why did Kagan even get a damn vote? She argued that the law was constitution and that it was not a tax, it was a penalty as solicitor general.

    • In other words, it was a very convoluted and screwed up path to an incorrect decision.

  • I am not going to comply. Period. When the IRS asks me to fill in by whom I am insured in 2014, I am going to write FUCK OFF on that line.

    Pardon my language, folks, but it's game on now for me and millions of others.

    In Liberty.

    Jeff
    Patriot and Rebel

  • I read somewhere today that the Anti-Injunction-Act prohibits a lawsuit against a tax, until the tax has been implemented and assessed. So, is the entire case invalid, and must be retried in 2014?

  • Apparently corporate controlled congress is above the constitution. That's Corporate Greed for ya.

    • And Holder and the Pres haven't been acting above the Constitution??? And it was a DEMOCRAT-controlled Congress, lest ye forget, Moonbat.

      And thanks for the laugh Pink Floyd.

    • John please tell me what the inside of your colon looks like...Your head is so far up your ass, I don't think there is any help for you any more..Get a roll of aluminum foil and make yourself a hat, and perhaps you won't hear those corporate greed voices in your head anymore, Buy the way Your internet provider is a corporation, how come you didn't respond to my question about why you support them by buying their service? Hypocrite.

      • It must be painful shoving that tin-foil wrapped head up his own ass, at least it seems that it’s smaller than most.

    • Look at you, running around and trying to collect some more of those red TDs! Gollum, honey, hasn't anyone explained to you yet that your plan to hurl them at the Evil Mordor Cheetos when the time for battle comes is *not* going to work?

  • I read some speculation about this yesterday and someone said that the House bill was substituted for the Senate one so technically, the bill arose in the House. I'll see if I can find that again and link it.