Immigration officials prohibited from looking at visa applicants’ social media

Immigration officials prohibited from looking at visa applicants’ social media. This is blatantly stupid. Should read – Obama decided to let more terrorist in so when something happens him and the Democrats can push for gun control, which is exactly what’s happening now.

Johnson decided to keep the prohibition in place in early 2014 because he feared a civil liberties backlash and “bad public relations,” according to ABC.

CO2Insanity: Tired of the CO2 BS and all the other BS in the US and the world.

View Comments (19)

  • So collegekids accounts can be studied and used to refuse acceptance to college, or result in disciplinary action. Employers can look at applicants and employees,but law enforcement can't look at potential terrorists? What the hell isWRONG with people? Its like everyone has had a frontal lobotomy without the scars!

  • that's right---maybe they would stop carnage--the regime can't have that now can they? maybe jeh-had johnson should be fired

  • I wonder if the terrorists, between rounds of goat sodomy, are depressed that as dumb and incompetent the US govt is, the terrorists still get whacked at regular intervals...

  • Who has time in the DHS to check out all these Islamic invaders, too busy wiretapping and trampling the rights of us domestic terrorists.

  • In Obama world, real data must be ignored. Especially if it would act to prevent or inhibit incorporation of the muslim virus into the US body.

  • Sounds like a leftie, doesn't it? More worried about offending a Muslim than the fact that Muslims are trying to cut their heads off?

  • However, the same fools wish to track my cell phone records, emails and texts.

    Talk about being bumbling idiot. It's not surprising though. This is the same bunch who refuse to call acts of terror, terror. So there is no need to search their social media post.

  • Want to bet that the IRS sure checked the social media of the Tea Party groups they denied of their Constitutional rights?