Kerry: If we’re wrong on Climate Change, “What’s the worst that can happen?”

Kerry: If we’re wrong on Climate Change, “What’s the worst that can happen?” “What if ’97 percent’ of scientists are wrong?” That 97% line was debunked a long time ago but that doesn’t stop people like Kerry from using it over and over again. Somewhere, a horse is going without an ass because of him.

This post was last modified on January 26, 2021

Bonfire of the Absurdities: After 35 year career writing software for IBM mainframes, am now self-employed contractor thinking of joining a union and striking for higher wages. Cured morbid fear of heights when I learned to look at them as lengths standing on end. Uncompromising in refusal to accept browser cookies. Amateur investor who has accumulated a small fortune in the market after starting out years ago with a large one. For recreation, I run, hike, kayak and play tennis but will not consider synchronized swimming under any circumstances.

View Comments (21)

  • As Lincoln said "You can fool some of the people all of the time" and we call them democrat voters.

  • You can' t control the weather. But there is always some sucker(s) from whom to scam money.

  • Man does not control the weather, God does. Trying to make money control the weather is stupidity.

  • Like everyone else in this administration, this clown is dumber than a brick. What's the worst? How about another many billion $ pissed away. But then it's not your wife's money, it's our money you asshole!

    • So nice you had to say it twice!

      It's all part of the progressive plan to decimate te economy, that way they will be able to take over complete control much easier, and the LIVs will follow like sheep to the slaughter.

  • Like everyone else in this administration, this clown is dumber than a brick. What's the worst? How about another many billion $ pissed away. But then it's not your wife's money, it's our money you asshole!

  • If you're wrong on climate change (which you are, but that is a separate discussion), it's perfectly okay.

    If you're wrong on wrecking the economy and our 21st century lifestyle to solve a non-existent problem, well I as well as many others will have an issue with that.

    But this attitude is not surprising. Read Dennis Prager's latest

    http://www.creators.com/conservative/dennis-prager.html

    As insane as it seems to us more-or-less sane people, yes, people like Kerry know full well that their policies will send us half way to the stone age, and they don't have a problem with that.

    Do not try to find or apply logic and reason to the thought process of an irrational person.

    • They want to send US back to the 19th century. They themselves will still live in the 21st.

      When the people that scream the loudest about AGW quit their high carbon lifestyles, then I might take their argument more seriously. Not much more but a smidgen more.

      • "They want to send US back to the 19th century. They themselves will still live in the 21st."

        That's exactly correct. Because they are enlightened, highly evolved, intelligent human beings. We, on the other hand, are mouth-breathing, knuckle dragging troglodytes that have no business owning cars to travel willy-nilly all over creation despoiling pristine wildernesses such as Yosemite, Yellowstone, San Francisco, the Hamptons, etc. Not to mention owning single-family homes.

    • But they are the first to bitch when their phones don't work, their computers don't have access to WiFi, or their cash registers can't tell them how much change to give.

      • I recall reading a great editorial that I thought i saved but can't find right now. Basically, the guy made the great point that the reason urban areas are so solidly blue is because they are so removed from the actual production of their lifestyle.

        They take for granted that you flick the switch and the lights come on, that you pull up to the gas station and cheap (indexed to inflation, it's cheap, and most certainly compared to Europe, it's damn near free), gas is always available, that cell phones, computers, pads, good houses, and fine foods are just "there". There is a complete disconnect between the products/services and the production thereof. Actually, they are absolutely clueless that there even IS a production process.

        So they end up with the viewpoint that you can have zero pollution, zero garbage, animal rights, and pristine wilderness everywhere, and still have all those things that make life what it is.

        If I find it or a link, I'll spring it on you, probably in a subsequent post.

        • I can't wait for it all to collapse and they suddenly find that nothing is available to them. Talk about culture shock! Their little balcony vegetable gardens won't last them long enough to figure out WTH happened! In the meantime, those of us who are preparing for this are going to be laughing at them.

        • A perfect example would be their electric cars and buses. They think that it's "zero emission." Actually, many of those cars are still coal powered.

          • Right on the money!

            And solar power is free too, and completely clean. As long as all the strip-mining to get the rare minerals takes place in China, far far away even from Beijing, Shanghai, and Hong Kong, where no media ever tread.

            Actually, much less are in effect coal-powered, thanks to ... fr ... fr ... fra ... FRACKING! Which allowed so much coal-burning to be replaced with natural gas that we already met the Kyoto goals.

  • I never thought I'd say this, but Kerry makes even some of the dimbulbs at MSNBC look smart. (Not all of them, mind you, but some)

  • Considering what has happened with our foreign policy, I would say it is going to be a disaster...Because it is run by the mentally ill and the Climate Clinger Cult.