Kurtz: The media ‘knew’ Cain would ‘never’ get the nomination: Of course they “knew” this. These journolists are rather adept at politically lynching the man or woman that strays too far from the master’s plantation.
This post was last modified on December 5, 2011
View Comments (11)
Is the arch-racist Olivia trying to tell up that a man's politics should be determined by his skin color, them calling US the ignorant bigots?
That "African American", ' Latin American" or "Asian American" non-sense is liberal excrement.
All that does is divide us as a people. And I'm sure that what it's liberal designers had in mind when they conceived it.
John Wayne's "The Hyphen
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_fuzLTrwVbc
The media and the DC crowd is doing what they does best, picking who they want for president. They wanted ourbummer so that’s who is there now, they want him or someone like him to be elected , their second choice is romeny (ourbummer white) after that its Newt and so on, the LAST person they wanted was someone that isn’t one for their own IE Cain . So they did all they could to dig up trash on him . If the media would have looked at ourbummer as they did Mr Cain , he wouldn’t have been nominated. The loss of Mr Cain is loss for the nation. But perhaps it will serve as a lesson that we need to take charge of the elections process and put them (the media and DC crowd ) in its place. Wake up people take back our power.
Agree, except for one thing. They didn't "dig up" anything. They made it up. Media feet need to be held to the fire on this one.
Well, I was going to post a comment to this, but Kip Hooker said what I was going to in the thread title comment.
He is a good man. That not only confuses them, it scares them.
I notice that you far righters just can't quite talk about Herman Cain without mentioning that he's black, or trotting out some race-related buzzword like "his master's plantation." Interesting, because the reasons for Cain's downfall have nothing to do with his race, and everything to do with poor choices on his part.
Let's be realistic here: the man had several serious accusations of sexual harassment against him (two that involved large payouts to women) and what appeared to be a longterm affair (come on, Herman, do you really expect anyone to believe that communicating with this woman at all hours for years on end, without your wife knowing anything about it, translates into innocent financial assistance from a "softhearted businessman"?) with many pages of telephone-and-text documentation. Not likely to appeal to Religious Right voters.
But even that paled before his total incompetence when asked a simple question about Libya, and his unworkable 9-9-9 economic plan, apparently stolen from a computer video game plot.
Bottom line: the man was clearly not a serious candidate from the get-go. He was apparently looking for some publicity for his own commercial ventures, and possibly a lucrative spot on FAUX News....which is what the media have been saying about him all along. Did anyone seriously think that, with the GOP'S poor track record for electing people of color to Congress, a black presidential candidate would stand a chance? Even one who knew something about foreign policy, and was capable of keeping his zipper closed?
TURKEY!!
"people of color" Really?
Not what she calls "them" at her Klan rallies, I can assure you of that.
It may not look like it, but this all started with JFK and LBJ jumping into bed with CIA. JFK has many critics, but he should have been voted out, not assassinated. The banana republic assassination followed by coup paradigm came back to the USA and it has run it ever since. Where's the REAL candidate? It certainly isn't fake Romney, enterprise corruptor Gingrich or Bush lite Rick Perry. It could have been Palin but she doesn't want to be assassinated.