In a surprising turn of events, the Left Anarchist Los Angeles Times has declined to endorse any candidates for governor or senator in the upcoming June primary elections.
All four people who still read the Times were baffled, one even proclaiming; “No hablo Inglés.”
The Times editorial said:
On the Democratic side, we find that we’re no fans of incumbent Barbara Boxer. She displays less intellectual firepower or leadership than she could. We appreciate the challenge brought by Robert “Mickey” Kaus, even though he’s not a realistic contender, because he asks pertinent questions about Boxer’s “lockstep liberalism” on labor, immigration and other matters. But we can’t endorse him, because he gives no indication that he would step up to the job and away from his Democratic-gadfly persona.
The woman has represented California in the United States Senate since 1992 and the state’s major newspaper is just now figuring out that Barbara “Call Me Senator” Boxer displays less intellectual firepower or leadership than she could?
That gives rise to the obvious question, “Who’s dumber? Barbara Boxer or the Los Angeles Times editorial board?”
Source: Los Angeles Times
This post was last modified on May 9, 2010


View Comments (6)
If Barbara Boxer's brain was in a hummingbirds rear, it would still fly backwards....
Methinks the poor bird would be flying backwards and left in a perpetual circle...
Barbara Boxer IS displaying all the intellectual firepower and leadership she can. 3 more IQ points and she'd be a carrot.
Well sadly the dumbest of the bunch could be the voters.
I left CA behind, in 1993 and don't regret it. Although I do agree with Admin (?) in that certain areas are soooo nice. I totally dig the area just north of San Diego, for example--very beautiful!
I just don't dig liberal policies or taxes...
Boxer is trash, & so are many of her voters.