MSNBC’s Matthews claims it’s unconstitutional for Romney to challenge Obama

View Comments (19)

• Tingles is projecting. Its illegal to challenge a dictator.

  If you listen to liberals, carefully, they will always tell you what they are planning-

  • What til Romney pulls down about 320 electoral college votes on election night to rout King Nothing. Matthews will burst into tears on live TV, & it will be awesome.

• Matthews is very sick mentally and emotionally and frankly i hope he and the rest of M.S.N.B.C. gets rabies

• Apparently Chris thinks Obama is due the kind of deference and kowtowing that was given a Divine Right monarch or Il Duce. He's a braying jacksass who knows nothing of the Constitution. I doubt he's actually seen the Constitution, let alone read it.

• Tingles needs to be charged with inciting riots and "hate speech"

• One day soon, Tingles is going to be hauled off on a backboard to a mental health facility, PMSNBC will call it exhaustion, but the rest of us will know it was a mental collapse on the scale of a black hole sucking up a planet. PMSNBC has now taken on a complete cartoon stature. I would sooner believe Bugs and Daffy and the Roadrunner and the Wylie Coyote were real than anything these idiots at Obamabot press have to say..Meep Meep.....

  • bugs ain't real?

    as for the article, the writer is wrong: America was founded because of our dissatisfaction with a monarchy run by kings and queens who were above the people.

    America was founded on the principle of freedom of worship. and the U.S. was founded not because monarchs were above the commoners, but because TYRANTS disallow personal freedoms.

• Hey wait a minute, was it not Hildabeast who said it was every Americans right to disagree with an administration? So what happened? The criticism is now flowing toward barry(as it should be) and the likes of Mathews are claiming its illegal and unconstitutional to do so. What a bunch of crap.

• The 4 year Whinefest has officially kicked off, a little early, but it's on.

• The looney left really do crave some supreme ruler. What's sad is that the liberal media are in lockstep, goose stepping right along with the commies.

  • I've always thought it rather amusing that the libtards that hate religion are the same one's who want to elect someone to lead them around by the nose. Talk about false idols.

• Well he was already unconstitutional when he stole the primary from Paul, so I don't think that will stop him.

  • I delighted that Paul isn't the candidate. He's too much in favor of corporate greed for my liking.

    • Actually, I'm more of a Rand Paul guy.

    • :) :)

  • Tell us where in the Constitution it says anything about how the Republican (or any other) Party chooses the person who will run for president?

    • John can't do that, he is too busy having another Paulsy attack. He is and forever shall be an imbecile.

• Well we already know it's RAAAACIST.