MSNBC’s Reid: Gun-Control Opposition is ‘Neo-Confederate’: In this brief clip Joy Reid demonstrates a profound misunderstanding of federalism as well as the 10th and 14th Amendments and their role concerning incorporation. But we’re sure she is every bit the Constitutional expert that Obama is.
This post was last modified on August 20, 2013
View Comments (18)
So, Joy Reid is a fucking retard? I'm shocked, SHOCKED I say.
Pull!
And a little lateral shift to the cf going on in Duncan, OK.
Just wondering when the shift happened to not only showing pictures, but of naming thugs [wannabe gangstas] and murderers [alleged] under 18 by the "msm". The examples of ppp in this case are 15, 16 and 17 I think. Not that I have a problem with it by any stretch.
PMSNBC once again displays racism, for the sake of racism. I can't wait until that communist mouthpiece of a network goes balls up due to nobody watching.
The racists are still watching, and there's obviously enough of them to keep it afloat.
Uhm... didn't confederate proposed gun control in order to keep guns from Black people so Black people wouldn't shoot the hell out of the whack jobs that wanted to lynch them for being Black :-/ And weren't Confederate in essence Democrats?
Yes Miss Kimmy, but here is yet another one who has escaped the plantation.
http://www.youtube.com/embed/n_YQ8560E1w?autoplay=1
Ohh, you mean like in History , the DemoRats ( confederate- Yo'all- Plantation Owners ) South- wanted slavery and the Union ( Republicans -Abe Lincoln )North- fought for their rights to be free. But yet we have a DemoRat Muzzie Emperor in power? Go Figure . But the Dems don't have Shame , they encourage it.
“I’ll have those n*ggers voting Democratic for the next 200 years.”
-Lyndon Baines Johnson about the Great Society plan.
Sadly DEMOCRAT president Johnson was correct.
Blacks traded one form of subjugation for another. Slavery/Jim Crow for the Great Society/Welfare State.
Where is the media fact check? Why has MSNBC not recanted her incorrect statements? The answer is that they no longer care about the truth. As long as it fits their agenda, facts no longer matter. And that is a fact.
Check this sh!t out...
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-WuzIpPX35iA/TyTsTIDSv9I/AAAAAAAAAMI/7JVAxXc3OtY/s640/Gun-Control.jpg
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-5fki6XQ7zHg/UBV7m7fe4dI/AAAAAAAAAp4/BL768R1gOak/s400/gun_control_obama_fast_and_furious_demotivational_poster_police_corpses.jpg
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-iGX99-fMriQ/UOXaeQXoLHI/AAAAAAAADtg/6YHhfOaJUR4/s640/CONTROL+GUNS+WINS.jpg
http://www.frugal-cafe.com/public_html/frugal-blog/frugal-cafe-blogzone/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/never-about-guns-about-control-poster.jpg
http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20120828072434/truecapitalist/images/4/4a/Guncontrol.jpg
http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20120828072434/truecapitalist/images/4/4a/Guncontrol.jpg
http://libertyendanger.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/touchstones-of-tyranny-tyranny-gun-control-politics-1338899290.jpg
http://freepostermaker.com/uploads/saved_posters/free-poster-b5aqm3j7om-THE-LIBERAL-VIEW-OF-GUN-CONTROL.jpg
...you get idea. BTW, to all of the gun control whackjobs, your stance is anti constitutional. If you want to ban guns, have the balls to announce your intentions & attempt to amend the constitution. You know, the way it's supposed to be done. Until then Senator Reid, suck it.
That fucking bitch can have my guns when shit like this isn't on the news every single night! http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/08/20/police-say-teen-shot-australian-student-in-oklahoma-for-fun-it/
Here is something the libturds need to see:
Effective Gun Control Within our Feeble Grasp…
You just gotta love it. Can't argue with statistics. Or Democrats!
In 1863 a Democrat shot and killed Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States.
In 1881 a left wing radical Democrat shot James Garfield, President of the United States who later died from the wound.
In 1963 a radical left wing socialist shot and killed John F. Kennedy, President of the United States.
In 1975 a left wing radical Democrat fired shots at Gerald Ford, President of the United States.
In 1983 a registered Democrat shot and wounded Ronald Reagan.
In 1984 James Huberty a disgruntled Democrat shot and killed 22 people in a McDonalds restaurant.
In 1986 Patrick Sherril a disgruntled Democrat shot and killed 15 people in an Oklahoma post office.
In 1990 James Pough a disgruntled Democrat shot and killed 10 people at a GMAC office.
In 1991 George Hennard a disgruntled Democrat shot and killed 23 people in a Lubys cafeteria.
In 1995 James Daniel Simpson a disgruntled Democrat shot and killed 5 coworkers in a Texas laboratory.
In 1999 Larry Asbrook a disgruntled Democrat shot and killed 8 people at a church service.
In 2001 a left wing radical Democrat fired shots at the White House in a failed attempt to kill George W. Bush, President of the US.
In 2003 Douglas Williams a disgruntled Democrat shot and killed 7 people at a Lockheed Martin plant.
In 2007 a registered Democrat named Seung - Hui Cho shot and killed 32 people in Virginia Tech.
In 2010 a mentally ill registered Democrat named Jared Lee Loughner shot Rep. Gabrielle Giffords and killed 6 others.
In 2011 a registered Democrat named James Holmes went into a movie theater and shot and killed 12 people.
In 2012 Andrew Engeldinger a disgruntled Democrat shot and killed 7 people in Minneapolis.
In 2013 a registered Democrat named Adam Lanza shot and killed 26 people in a school.
One could go on, but you get the point, even if the media does not. Clearly, there is a problem with Democrats and guns.
No NRA members, Tea Party members, or Republican conservatives are involved.
Conclusion: It should be illegal for Democrats to own guns!
Immediately after JFK was shot, the buzz among the media was: "Dallas", "Conservative stronghold". Then when they found out it was the radical leftist Oswald, the media narrative quickly changed to: "Lone gunman".
Or illegal to be Democrat?
MSNBC -- all you need to know.
*click*
She appears to be part of the neo-dumbasses