Times takes two weeks to correct obvious falsehood. On September 11, on the subject of Obama’s military campaign against ISIS, they printed this on the front page:
“Unlike Mr. Bush in the Iraq war, Mr. Obama has sought to surround the United States with partners.”
In actual fact, Bush had 48 members of his international coalition – plus Congress and the UN – while Obama barely managed to scrape up 9 allies and ignored both Congress and the UN. On Tuesday, The Slimes finally got around to printing a correction.
This post was last modified on January 26, 2021
View Comments (8)
If thosepeople B-) ad any brains, t h ey would be intellectually c hall e nged. As it is, they ar just stupid. Weapons grade stupid, right Dany boy?
The times get their info from obama who gets his info from the times
This wasn't a correction of a mistake, it was a correction of a deliberate lie, but they will never admit to that.
When did the NY Times start caring about accuracy?
Did they print the retraction on page one, or page 87, under the Obits.
The New York Times: where truth goes to die.
The NYT is to Truth as Florida is to old people.
I'd like to be the first to say that I wouldn't wipe a parrot's ass with this communist rag, Pravda had more journalistic integrity.
But then math has never been a liberal's strong suit either.