‘Newt Gingrich is a hypocrite’, claims ex-staffer who had affair with thrice-married GOP candidate

Anne Manning

‘Newt Gingrich is a hypocrite’, claims ex-staffer who had affair with thrice-married GOP candidate. Amazing! Herman Cain is in the lead and bimbos start coming out of the woodwork with dubious allegations.  Now that Cain is out of the way and Newt’s a threat we get this woman making allegations about something that allegedly happened in 1977! We have to wonder if anyone’s paying them. Meanwhile, try and get Obama’s birth certificate or any records at all.

 

CO2Insanity: Tired of the CO2 BS and all the other BS in the US and the world.

View Comments (36)

  • Top 10 Reasons Newt Had an Affair with This (ahem) Woman...
    10. Her gold medal status as a shot putter for East Germany scored Gingrich sweet tickets to the 1976 Olympics in Montreal.
    9. Her religious fundamentalist looks and attire assured them entry to church potlucks all across Georgia.
    8. She was a socially acceptable substitute for living out his man-crush on Jack Nance from the newly released film "Eraserhead."
    7. With her, he could always feel safe walking the streets at night.
    6. Dating her, he doubled his wardrobe.
    5. After "One Flew Over the cuckoo's Nest" he never got over that thing he developed for Nurse Ratched.
    4. She could bench press 600 lbs. Impressive!
    3. The efficiency of sharing the same Remington electric shaver.
    2. She embodied all that was right about The Kinks' song "Lola" in his humble opinion.
    1. He was impressed with her prowess as a linebacker for the Atlanta Falcons.

      • Never made me puke, but Lord, was I confused! Watched it as a desperation move at a midnight movie-we had already seen everything else we were at all interested in, and some dork from the theatre recommended Eraserhead. Weird, weird movie. It is my go-to example of a movie that made no sense and was not worth even the discounted admission price we paid. ($2.00 I think)

  • Now I remember where I've seen this *thing* before. It's Aunt Esther from 'Sanford & Son'...

    Getting a BJ from her would probably exfoliate, too.

  • She's either a sister wife or a lesbian. The hair and clothes tell all. She tried for years to get Newt to have sex with her, but he kept saying "I'm sorry but I only boink my own species."

  • What will matter with Newt is whether or not any of this type of behavior is current. He married his current wife in 2000 and converted to Catholicism in 2009. He says he's a 68-year-old grandfather and a changed man. They're not going to be able to get anywhere with this stuff as long as it's in the distant past. It's funny how all the Clinton apologists from the 90s are now big on moral failings. Hypocrites! As regards the comments at the top of this thread: Obama's personal struggles, probably stemming from father starvation, seem even more explosive and potentially destroying of his career than those of Cain, Gingrich, and even Clinton.

    • As regards the comments at the top of this thread: Obama’s personal struggles, probably stemming from father starvation, seem even more explosive and potentially destroying of his career than those of Cain, Gingrich, and even Clinton.

      Don't forget that his mother rejected him too.
      IMO, BHO is a very angry guy and it shows. You don't need to be Freud to see the transference of his anger from his parents toward political enemies real and imagined (chronic use of straw men) and our economic system that he denounces as "unfair".

      • This can't be real, coming from you: bullshit tofu-talK? Have you been spending quality time with Barbara Streisand/Oprah? I've gotta' clean my waders after walking through the pile of psycho-bullshit you just put out. Just call the guy a commie/marxist and get it over with.

        • Erik, perceived or actual rejection/abandonment by a mother or father is not just an Oprah issue, it can be the conflict that wrecks entire nations. Hitler hated his stern, loveless father. The Jews seemed to be father substitutes for him. Though Hitler's Catholicism was nominal at the beginning of his life, he loved to have priests killed on feast days of the Church. Were these priests more father substitutes? Stalin had a drunken father who beat him and his mother. He was also merciless towards religious figures whom he seemed to take his anger out on as substitutes for his father. Many of the monsters causing bloody violence in America's inner cities are enraged fatherless boys. Obama had the type of childhood which is typical in many who turn into tyrants given the perfect storm. There have been threads on here in the past few months in which Jesse Jackson, Jr. and the North Carolina Governor seemed to have thought that maybe Obama should suspend democracy and just force things. Obama's use of czars is already a troubling signal in my opinion.

          • Hitler was beaten within an inch of his life by his father. He was bedridden for days and days. I'm logging this as something never inflicted upon Obama by his mother and grandparents

          • No. Obama was simply abandoned by his father and mother. You do not believe that is damaging, Alien? Being an (for all intents and purposes) orphan dumped on the grandparents doorstep. I think that will do some pretty serious psychic damage to most people. Or at least generate some baggage.

          • That's a different discussion.. drawing parallels with Hitler and Stalin is another. I don't think Obama is as scarred or angry as many of you seem to. I find him a disappointing figure generally, and he was far too hyped up in that election

          • I think that debating Barry on substance (or lack thereof) is a much better topic. How he may or may not have grown up really doesn't help -- a lot of people here have had profoundly f*cked up childhoods -- to say that they are not qualified to lead based upon that leaves me to wonder who the hell is.

            I'd also like to avoid invoking Godwin's as much as possible. We haven't sunk so far as a nation as that (yet) and the whole purpose is to see that we don't.

          • I think that debating Barry on substance (or lack thereof) is a much better topic.

            I think it is equally useful to examine where someone comes from. Obama just didn't spring up at the 2004 Convention. He has a past (as murky as it may be) and I believe that past shaped him and made him who he is today.

          • I think that's key to understanding him -- but Freud *did* say that "sometimes a cigar is just a cigar" (except when it's in Slick Willy's hands...)

            Point is, it provides insight and explanation of how we got here, and what's in his head, but is not a deal-killer. The deal-killer's the policies and legislation he is pushing -- and I don't need to know his momma was a freak to not like them.

  • 1) She looks like a refugee from the "Waiting for Zion" Fundamental Mormon ranch in West Texas.
    2) She performs oral sex on a married man and HE'S a hypocrit?
    3) She has clearly exposed herself as a slut who has sex with married men

    Newt has never denied his issues. If you don't like them, don't vote for him. If you feel his personal life does not affect his functioning in the office for which he is running, then vote for him.

    • Compared the Newt's other wives, she's Miss America! Callista Gingrich looks like she's from Star Trek, Star Wars, or Spaceballs; her shellacked football helmet head (vice armadillo) is freakish in the xtreme.
      I'll admit this hussy looks like Harold Ramis with knockers, but, what the hell, it's the best lard-gut Gringrich could do.

      • She is a bit odd looking from some angles, but that's immaterial. As many here already know, i think its poor form to attack the spouses

        • Ever the gentleman, Alien.

          I agree -- up to a point.

          It depends upon the role the presidential spouse takes upon herself. If she has some kind of socially relevant work, then she gets whatever commentary is due someone of high stature in that perspective. For example, if she pursues ideals and goals, driving people to be better, then I think that's just great. If she promotes a charity, then as long as the charity is legitimate, then it is perfectly laudable. If she promotes an ever larger role for the state to interfere in our lives or other political behavior, then I have a problem, especially if she is posited to us as a form of ersatz president, speaking from a position of actual power. At that point, I figure that she is willingly taking on this role, and should expect to be controversial.

          Any chairperson of a charity, as an example, has a level of public notoriety. However, the wife of the president brings much greater notoriety to it -- which is often the reason they choose (or are requested) to take on some of these roles in charities.

          This is how the laws work regarding celebrities. Rude or uncomplimentary commentary about an average person can be beyond the pale, is definitely not proper form, and can be actionable in court. Movie stars and other celebrities are viewed in the courts as having willingly taken upon the additional attention that comes with the role, and should expect and deal with the problems that come with it without the same level of social or legal protections. They did not have the celebrity status thrust upon them - they could choose to retire from public life at any point. Likewise, if a president's wife chooses to retire from the public eye after seeing unwanted negative attention, then her wishes should be respected -- up to a point, depending upon the harm done. i.e. If someone sets my house on fire, and then says they've found Jesus, they're still going to jail.

          If she simply wishes to maintain her privacy from the beginning, I completely agree that she is *completely* off limits. However, in today's world, that's just not realistic for the modern president's wife -- the temptation to have her at least campaign for hubby is apparently way too strong.

  • Bill Clinton had so many affairs that there was a whole group of people dedicated to doing nothing but attacking the women. All we ever heard was that it was his personal life and none of our business.

    This lady comes out almost 35 years later, come on. What is in it for her? Yea Newt likes the women, so didnt Bill Clinton. At least Newt has not gone on TV and stuck his finger in our faces and said "I've never had sex with that woman"