OBlowme doesn't have the balls to debate against anyone really because all his words are telepromted. A while back his talking piece quit working and he melted in front of everybody. This socialist only knows Alinsky jive and that won't work with the people. Maybe the proglibs but no one else. I believe Newt would paralize him in a debate.
Someone let me know when Newt says he wants to cut a trillion dollars of wasteful government spending his first year in office and wants to eliminate the income tax and the IRS.
Plus the FED!
These things would surely bring a few more eyes and ears on him, people wondering what all the global occupation elites that own him think about it! I never disliked Newt. Actually always thought his ability was excellent. I have suspicions about his real loyalties. If he said he wanted to shake the IRS and the FED and would bring Dr. Paul on board to run those aspects I think he'd get more attention than any political player in the past 30 years! He could have two hookers for wives concurrently and the media still wouldn't be able to stop his march to the hill!
"I have suspicions about his real loyalties."
Yea, me too. I still don't think Gnewt can be trusted not to lie.
I have a simple rule about lying. Lie (even by omission, distortion or exaggeration) to me once, and I will never take what you say, at face value, again. Children are one thing, they learn about it. However, adults, especially 'Politicians', I'm done with you. Action's would be the only determining factor at that point and I don't believe Gnewt has proven he can be trusted to do what he says.
I've said it before....I'd pay $49.95 for Pay Per View to see a Newt/Obama dbate in the Lincoln/Douglas style.
I wouldn't pay, unless it was the Burr/Hamilton style.
Would be a good test to see if 'Gnewt' has changed his 'stripes'. O'bitch wouldn't show, at best he would send his second (O'biden).
Now, THAT would be funny! The RNC could film their entire campaign in one evening.
Never happen, even the idiots at PMSNBC know better then put the "Chosen One" into a situation that would show the world what a stuttering moron he really is.
Underestimate Obama's debate skills at peril. He was no stuttering fool at the last set, and Newt may be vulnerable for nuanced policy positions. Republicans also can't put up a crank at loss for details and hope to roll over him.
My advice is better then hoping he fails because of lack of teleprompter.. i assert this, mainly, because last time he lacked a teleprompter
I don't think so, it seems their golden idol is tarnished, and he's been making a lot more gaffs and mistakes. About the only thing he's been capable of is blaming just about everybody for his failures. Also I watched the debate with McCain, and Newt is a lot sharper.
Cain has been recorded getting heated but catching himself in time to prevent melting down. Perry can't be counted on to remember a third detail of any statement. Ron Paul, nothing needs to be said about his ability to lose a debate against any smarmy talker. Bachmann and Romney both have a robotic sound in their delivery. Huntsman and Santorum? No comment needed since the have no chance to enter the face off, not that some of these others don't, too.
Newt is a remarkable debater but has baggage on his cart that people will get hypnotized over by the fawning obamedia.
Unfortunately John Bolton and Paul Ryan are not running. Either of those guys would shred the occupussy in a debate with their mouths taped shut.
Newt has a quick mind and is very intelligent, and I believe got very used to swiftly bullshitting his way out of troubles. Bullshittery can look like lying, when one characterizes lobbying strategy as historical consultation, for 6-7 figures. In this respect, he is much like Slick Willie. Those two made excellent foils for one another
Back then he had no record and he could lie through his teeth regarding campaign promises. He now has a record he can not run on and simple things like pass stimulus to keep unemployment below 8% will kill him.
Definitely agree, this is Republicans to lose, and hopefully they put up skilled contender for debate fight
You're right but that would be some must see TV.
"Dear Leader" dosen't have the cojones to debate Newt, he knows damn well he'll get his ass handed to him, with a side order of humility.
Even with Blamo's kissass moderators doing everything to make him look good and Newt bad.
Really, he sounds slurred, I don;t think all of it's bad sound. Has he had a dam stroke or something?
The difference between Gingrich and Obama: Newt we're laughing with; Barry we're laugh at.
(I couldn't quite make out what he was saying in about a 20 second stretch there from around the 2:14 mark on but it, too, got a lot of laughs.)
Ruben, I couldn't make out what he was saying either. If anybody has a transcript of this it'd be great.
Gingrich's sentences were somewhat disjointed after the two minute mark but he basically said that if Obama doesn't agree to Lincoln-Douglas style debates, he will follow the President around the world and speak wherever he speaks four hours later, thinking Obama would then agree to the Lincoln-Douglas format. The best I could make it out was this:"But when I am your nominee ... If the President has not already agreed (to the debates) ... in the acceptance speech ... I will announce as of that moment the White House and my schedule (laughs) ... wherever he goes ... Because of the modern world of (inaudible) communications, I will show up four hours after he speaks ..."
Newt would mop the floor with Obysmal and then hand him his head as a consolation prize.
View Comments (24)
OBlowme doesn't have the balls to debate against anyone really because all his words are telepromted. A while back his talking piece quit working and he melted in front of everybody. This socialist only knows Alinsky jive and that won't work with the people. Maybe the proglibs but no one else. I believe Newt would paralize him in a debate.
Someone let me know when Newt says he wants to cut a trillion dollars of wasteful government spending his first year in office and wants to eliminate the income tax and the IRS.
Plus the FED!
These things would surely bring a few more eyes and ears on him, people wondering what all the global occupation elites that own him think about it! I never disliked Newt. Actually always thought his ability was excellent. I have suspicions about his real loyalties. If he said he wanted to shake the IRS and the FED and would bring Dr. Paul on board to run those aspects I think he'd get more attention than any political player in the past 30 years! He could have two hookers for wives concurrently and the media still wouldn't be able to stop his march to the hill!
"I have suspicions about his real loyalties."
Yea, me too. I still don't think Gnewt can be trusted not to lie.
I have a simple rule about lying. Lie (even by omission, distortion or exaggeration) to me once, and I will never take what you say, at face value, again. Children are one thing, they learn about it. However, adults, especially 'Politicians', I'm done with you. Action's would be the only determining factor at that point and I don't believe Gnewt has proven he can be trusted to do what he says.
I've said it before....I'd pay $49.95 for Pay Per View to see a Newt/Obama dbate in the Lincoln/Douglas style.
I wouldn't pay, unless it was the Burr/Hamilton style.
Would be a good test to see if 'Gnewt' has changed his 'stripes'. O'bitch wouldn't show, at best he would send his second (O'biden).
Now, THAT would be funny! The RNC could film their entire campaign in one evening.
Never happen, even the idiots at PMSNBC know better then put the "Chosen One" into a situation that would show the world what a stuttering moron he really is.
Underestimate Obama's debate skills at peril. He was no stuttering fool at the last set, and Newt may be vulnerable for nuanced policy positions. Republicans also can't put up a crank at loss for details and hope to roll over him.
My advice is better then hoping he fails because of lack of teleprompter.. i assert this, mainly, because last time he lacked a teleprompter
I don't think so, it seems their golden idol is tarnished, and he's been making a lot more gaffs and mistakes. About the only thing he's been capable of is blaming just about everybody for his failures. Also I watched the debate with McCain, and Newt is a lot sharper.
Cain has been recorded getting heated but catching himself in time to prevent melting down. Perry can't be counted on to remember a third detail of any statement. Ron Paul, nothing needs to be said about his ability to lose a debate against any smarmy talker. Bachmann and Romney both have a robotic sound in their delivery. Huntsman and Santorum? No comment needed since the have no chance to enter the face off, not that some of these others don't, too.
Newt is a remarkable debater but has baggage on his cart that people will get hypnotized over by the fawning obamedia.
Unfortunately John Bolton and Paul Ryan are not running. Either of those guys would shred the occupussy in a debate with their mouths taped shut.
Newt has a quick mind and is very intelligent, and I believe got very used to swiftly bullshitting his way out of troubles. Bullshittery can look like lying, when one characterizes lobbying strategy as historical consultation, for 6-7 figures. In this respect, he is much like Slick Willie. Those two made excellent foils for one another
Back then he had no record and he could lie through his teeth regarding campaign promises. He now has a record he can not run on and simple things like pass stimulus to keep unemployment below 8% will kill him.
Definitely agree, this is Republicans to lose, and hopefully they put up skilled contender for debate fight
You're right but that would be some must see TV.
"Dear Leader" dosen't have the cojones to debate Newt, he knows damn well he'll get his ass handed to him, with a side order of humility.
Even with Blamo's kissass moderators doing everything to make him look good and Newt bad.
Really, he sounds slurred, I don;t think all of it's bad sound. Has he had a dam stroke or something?
The difference between Gingrich and Obama: Newt we're laughing with; Barry we're laugh at.
(I couldn't quite make out what he was saying in about a 20 second stretch there from around the 2:14 mark on but it, too, got a lot of laughs.)
Ruben, I couldn't make out what he was saying either. If anybody has a transcript of this it'd be great.
Gingrich's sentences were somewhat disjointed after the two minute mark but he basically said that if Obama doesn't agree to Lincoln-Douglas style debates, he will follow the President around the world and speak wherever he speaks four hours later, thinking Obama would then agree to the Lincoln-Douglas format. The best I could make it out was this:"But when I am your nominee ... If the President has not already agreed (to the debates) ... in the acceptance speech ... I will announce as of that moment the White House and my schedule (laughs) ... wherever he goes ... Because of the modern world of (inaudible) communications, I will show up four hours after he speaks ..."
Newt would mop the floor with Obysmal and then hand him his head as a consolation prize.