NPR compares Obama’s “if you love me, help me pass this bill” convo to Bible verse

View Comments (17)

• Yea as I walk through the valley of stupidity, I shall fear no impeachment, for Soro's hand guideth me down the path of socialism.

• Psalms 109:8 Let his days be few; and let another take his office.

• Our Father who art in Washington, Obungles be thy name.
  Thy will not be done in your kingdom come or in any other part of earth or heaven
  Give us this day our daily unemployment and forgive those who voted for you
  as we fail to forgive your trespasses against on constitution
  For thine is minimal power with no glory and only stupidity forever and ever.
  Amen

  • That's funny right there

  • LOLOLOLOLOL

    • Every once in a while you swing and it goes over the fence..:)

      • With eyes closed and one hand tied even. Thanks, now what's the best way to clean off this beer I just spit all over my screen?

        • Bounty paper towels.

        • Ah yes, the quicker picker-upper, how could I forget. Much obliged Babydoll.

        • No problem, I only hope you got it in time. Beer and computers dont mix :)

• Politics are a religion substitute for liberals. Obama manipulates the spiritual hunger of kids and liberals in general. He did this when he talked about a light guiding people to vote for him. He did this when he talked about the planet beginning to heal and the seas stopping their rise after he secured the Democratic nomination. The disgusting thing about all this to me is that Obama has made one of the most nakedly aggressive religious appeals ever seen in this country and yet still we're warned about the religion of conservative candidates. The biblical figure Obama reminds me of is Herod. He defends and even aids the slaughter of the innocents for political power.
  http://obamamessiah.blogspot.com

  • Speaking of Herod, My husband was reading an article about King David in the older Nat'Geo magazine maybe a month ago now. I didnt read the article so I am badly paraphrasing here from what he told me, somehow the article tracted off to talking about Solomon's temple and the rebuilding of it by Herod. Then in a phrase the article mentioned King Herod as the one who according to the Bible slaughtered innocent baby boys throughout the city of Bethlehem, though it was an inaccurate account and probably didnt happen. The enitre rest of the article was all speculation itself, but the biblical account was immediatly reguarded as false. My response to this was " Tell that to the mothers who's baby boy was murdered for no other reason than a King's paranoia."
    He was so disgusted that he now refuses to buy another Nat'Geo magazine.

    I dont know much about the whole, did he or did he not, argument. I am inclined to believe the accounts of those who lived in those times versus those who discredit them now that 2,000 years have past.

    • NatGeo sometimes surprises me with unbias stuff, but I most admit the fact that I am surprised means that most of the time, they do a lot of crap and I can't stand that.

      I agree. Stating that something is false because it is old is a stupid thing to do. No one with a brain will say that Julius Caesar was not murdered in a plot involving Brutus, just because that was so long ago and no one (that lives now) was there to know otherwise. Obviously no one that lives now was there... duh, however there were historians that recorded the events and to state they are wrong because it is old is arrogant and stupid. Obviously people who want to control history and dislike something will always want to discredit something on any grounds no matter how idiotic.

    • Some modern Biblical scholars want to throw a lot of the Bible out under the historical-critical method of Scripture interpretation. I once heard a priest say in church that Jesus didn't multiply the loaves and fishes but that the real miracle was Him getting people to share their loaves and fishes and that this was how that miracle took place. I audibly scoffed. When this same thing was down in front of a now deceased friend of mine he got up and walked out of church for a few minutes. I had a wise person once tell me to never let anyone talk me out of the literal miracles of Jesus because it would be the beginning of the end of my faith.

      • That "explanation" by the pastor was irresponsible in my humble opinion. It fails to explain the fact that there weren't enough of the fish and loaves to begin with. The fact that there were few, is the reason why Jesus had to multiply. If anything there were about 8-10 thousand people both times (probably more) if they only had a small amount of that they could gather from all those people, sharing the food as is, was out of the question. Also to assume that those people who were there to listen to at the very least in their minds a prophet from G-d, were not the kind that would share their food with one another is weak. Was that pastor spoken to?

        • KimmyQueen:"Was the pastor spoken to?"

          I don't know if he was spoken to. Let me say that this denial of the miracle of the loaves and the fishes by saying that Jesus performed instead some kind of miracle of getting hungry people to share is a surprisingly common watering down of Jesus' Divinity among liberal Christians. It's not the only time I've heard it.

        • I don't understand how someone can deny His Divinity yet claim Him as their Deity. It is rather bizarre.