NYTimes sends lackeys to erase Islam from Boston bombing story

NYSlimes_logo.jpg


NY Times sends lackeys to erase Islam from Boston bombing story:

“While the New York Times dispatched its best and brightest lackeys to Boston to write sensitive pieces on how hard it was for the two Tsarnaevs to fit in, it fell to a UK tabloids like The Sun to conduct an interview with the ex-girlfriend of the lead terrorist and learn that he wanted her to hate America and beat her because she wouldn’t wear a Hijab.”

This post was last modified on January 26, 2021

J.P. Travis: Born and raised in Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1976 graduate of University of Michigan, father, grandfather, husband, founder and CEO of Travelyn Publishing (http://www.travelynpublishing.com/), and passionate anti-government believer in individual liberty.

View Comments (20)

  • It's mind-boggling why the left would pander to the Islamists. It's like they want sharia yet at the same time all their 'liberal' ways would not be tolerated. It's like some sort of masochism. They love the control and eventually love being controlled. It makes no sense.

    • The are deluded into thinking that their support of the rise of Islam will guarantee them protection and exceptions when the radical Islamists take over. Americans are notorious for a very benign and naive take on other cultures. We were celebrating a peace treaty with Japan when they bombed Pearl Harbor, catching us not just with our pants down, but completely lost. In other cultures smiling to your face while stabbing you in the back is not only accepted, it is considered appropriate. While Islam is negotiating with the State Department and the local judges, whatch out for another attack.

    • They want to be supportive of those that would kill them.
      Preemptive Stockholm Syndrome.

      • That and their obsession with cultural relativism prevents them from seeing how they will be put down when they are no longer needed. They have put their collective heads right in the lion's mouth.

  • Aren't all the NYT staff lackeys? No one there is allowed to "report" on anything except what the left talking points proscribe.

  • Lame Stream Media outlets like the NY Slimes only print fluff pieces, and yellow press according to their agenda. If they did their jobs, we wouldn't hear about the Charlie Rangels, stealing millions, or the Cumos using disaster relief money to place TV ads to entice companies to open businesses in NY.

  • I stopped using the New York Times to paper train my puppy. He would read the articles and laugh so much and pee on the carpet.

  • Erase at our peril. If not for sites like this, talk radio, and to an extent FOX News, there would be no watch dog media, just lieberal regressive lap dogs.

  • If you read the NY Times (a nauseating task) or any of the other major media outlets you'd be led to think that Islam was purely coincidental to the Tsarniev brothers bomb attack on the Boston marathon. Every possible motivation for the attack is dredged up and mulled over while the 800 Islamic gorilla is studiously ignored.

    Obama killed Osama and won the war on terror, so there can't be terrorism
    any more. Major Hasan's Fort Hood massacre or the Benghazi embassy attack weren't terrorism, Obama fixed that. No, Ft. Hood was workplace violence while Benghazi was a protest over a video. And so the Tsarniev brothers represent America's failure to assimilate imigrants, their cultural alienation or something, Tamerlan as Holden Caulfield.

    So if you insist the attacks were, indeed, terrorism the MSM claps its collective hands over its ears and chants "Nya, nya, nya...can't hear you!"

  • What doesn't fit in is the fish wrap Times. Yet again it's a UK publication that exposes what is the truth. From their reporting we, US citizens might get some semblance of the truth.

  • At this point it is hardly surprising... journalistic integrity is as dead as they would have us believe that terrorism is.