Piers Morgan is obviously still filled with helpless shame after losing that gun-control debate to Ben Shapiro, because he’s still coming up with stuff he thinks he should’ve said that night. That’s why, instead of keeping it to himself, he delighted us all with this: America has over 5000 nuclear warheads. Quite hard to defend against a ‘tyrannical U.S. government’ with that kind of firepower. #GetReal. No worries there. We’ll just make sure to pass some very serious anti-fallout legislation before the nuking begins. That should be sufficient to keep everybody safe. #PiersFail.
View Comments (14)
Piers Morgan thinks a tyrannical U.S. government is impossible
Hasn't he been paying attention the last 4 years?
He's from Britain, what's been going on here for the last four years is freedom comparatively.
PM's tactic of arguing by invoking an extreme like this that is so ridiculously out of context to the main topic of discussion is just boring and does nothing but expose his inane arrogance. The point of this whole argument is that citizens HAVE the right to bear arms, and it's being taken away, and that is tyranny.
Reductio ad absurdum. The last tactic of a defeated debater.
Everytime this dickwad opens his mouth, other than to service his boss, utter stupidity flows out.
Let's see, Piers. If the government nukes their citizens they're not going to have much left to govern when they come out of their bunkers. Looks like yet another fail for Piers.
And where will they get the taxes to pay their salaries?
A wharf has purpose in life.
Well put!
Piers probably thinks that's a feature rather than a bug as it will make for smaller lines at his favorite bistro.
I guess his mother named him "Piers" because he's smart as a wharf.
He's a God damn fool.
He’s a God damn fool.
Hey, I know God damned fools, and THEY think he is a moron.
This guy insists we do something about automatic weapons and AT-15's .233s! Isn't he "smrt" using proper terminology (which he insists he is). What a tool. Someone needs to remind him that a law against hacking didn't stop him from doing it....
Had another dummy on FB come up with the "why do you need assault rifles? They're not in the Constitution anyway?" nonsense.
First I asked her to provide me with information about a crime committed in this country by any person not part of a law enforcement agency, with an assault rifle. Of course, when she comes back with a few, I'll school her on the meaning of assault rifle.
Then I asked her to show me where the Constitution allows for her to have a computer hooked up to the internet.