12 points! Republicans jump to biggest lead in history in Rasmussen’s generic congressional poll

Tsunami alert! Tsunami alert! All Democrats should immediately move to higher ground.

Rasmussen has the ugly details:

Republican candidates have jumped out to a record-setting 12-point lead over Democrats on the Generic Congressional Ballot for the week ending Sunday, August 15, 2010. This is the biggest lead the GOP has held in over a decade of Rasmussen Reports surveying.

A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 48% of Likely Voters would vote for their district’s Republican congressional candidate, while 36% would opt for his or her Democratic opponent. Support for Republicans is up two points from the previous week, while support for Democrats dropped three points.Republicans have led on the Generic Congressional Ballot since June of last year, and their lead hasn’t fallen below five points since the beginning of December. Three times this year, they’ve posted a 10-point lead. Prior to this survey, GOP support since June 2009 has ranged from 41% to 47%. Support for Democrats in the same period has run from 35% to 40%. 


Eighty-three percent (83%) of Republicans back their party’s candidate, while 75% of Democrats support the candidate of their party. Voters not affiliated with either party prefer the GOP candidate by a 52% to 21% margin.Fifty-four percent (54%) of white voters favor the Republican, but 77% of African-Americans prefer the Democrat.

Say goodnight, Nancy. Say goodnight, Harry. Say goodnight, Barack.

Source: Rasmussen

editor:

View Comments (31)

  • It's funny that two people have already said they didn't like that last comment. Does that mean that they would go to an incompetent doctor?

  • Hey for any of you interested, Palin will be on FNC at 7:00 and 10:00 Pacific. I do not at all like Gretta Van Whoever, but I will watch tonight.

  • If you read my posts I haven't ever used the word Teabagger.

    Palin didn't even know what the vice-president did when she accepted her nomination as running mate.

    She said that she was qualified to make decisions about foreign policy because she could see Russia and would be the first to see planes flying towards the US.

    You really want to try and defend her? You have to love Americans love for mediocrity....

    • Sam:
      1: I never said you did use the word teabagger, I'm just making sure that wasn't the reason you have such strong feelings toward Palin.
      2. Quick without Googleing it, what does the Vice President do EXACTLY...? I can bet you a good amount of Americans, and a fair amount of politicians would not be able to answer that.
      3. Really? I think Jimbo sums it up...
      4. Is defending her any different from defending FDR, Clinton (either one), Obama, or any other person on this Earth? Also I never tried to defend her (before this comment), I was merely trying to figure out what makes you think of her as inferior.
      -P@R

      • Libs don't need reasons to think she's inferior. She's a pretty, charismatic, Republican and a major threat to their communist agenda. she calls the barockstar out on his bull and that's scary so they blast her in the media and walk around thinking they're better. Like bill maher, smarter and more eloquent than everyone.

      • Would you want to go to a surgeon that didn't understand all of the procedures that his professions demanded? I'm guessing not. Why would you defend the intelligence of a politician that is clearly not qualified for her positions?

        And what does Palin's intelligence have to do with Obama?

        • Well Sammie, it appears that the majority of folks in the USA did just that in the last presidential election. We elected an idiot with zero experience running anything and look what we have now. Most thinking people don't see Sarah as presidential, but she's twice as qualified at Obama.

    • Palin's actual quote: "They're our next-door neighbors and you can actually see Russia from land here in Alaska, from an island in Alaska." Sam, you really want to compare credentials? What the hell kind of executive experience did Obama have? I'll take Palin over the community organizer.

  • It's funny that people on here click that they don't like my comment about Palin being stupid. Could someone use words to try and explain how she isn't extremely dumb?

  • Hey Mike, Thank you. I very much hope Palin get the nod. The problem we have to consider is that Gingrich looks like he is going to run against her. I like Mr. G, but I do NOT want him to battle against her. It will cost the winner too much money. Either would be great, but not against each other. After the primary, they will probably be against obombie-the-commie. He will be rested and have LOS of money, AND have the media kissing his rear end.
    The 2010 mid-terms are going to be a huge battle Take Reid of Nevada. Sharon Angle is sort of a basket case. Reid has the eye-recognition, and is filling his war chest. I don't give Angle a 50/50 chance. We have to support the Tea Parties, and Stay optimistic, BUT stay cautious.

    • If Palin is the candidate, Republicans lose. I love Palin, but not for president. Smart or not, she does not come off as overly intelligent. Tough, yes. And there are simply too many people who won't vote for her.

      Her best role is doing exactly what she is doing right now. I hope to hell that she realizes that.

      • Correctomundo Senor Admin guy. I love Palin, but she has too much baggage to win. Surely there is a dark horse out there somewhere. (no pun intended)

        • Puns are TOTALLY acceptable here.

          And I would vote for a Conservative Constitutionalist "Dark Horse" if he/she had a sufficient paper trail to verify their position.

      • I have to admit you may very well be right here. Gingrich is playing footsie with Hanity, as to his presidential desires. In the last pres race, I liked all the candidates except McCain't, and Ron Paul. (Ron Paul's ideas are worth considering, but he is just too weird to get elected.) I like Thompson, and Huckabee, and think either could be a formidable opponent to obombie-the-commie.

      • "Smart or not"...that's funny. You really aren't even willing to say she's a moron? She accepted running for vice-president while not having a clue as to what the role actually entails. In her very short stint in the public eye she has amassed a blooper reel to rival anyone.

  • Nah guys. I think you are waaaaaay too optimistic. I have never seen a party who could so aptly snatch defeat from the jaws of victory as the Republicans can. It didn't take a rocket scientist to know how totally bad Obombie was during the campaign. And the bestest the Repubs could do was McCain't? What a lackluster C- politician he is. I think we had better keep our noses to the grindstone, and not start hatching our chickens until we've counted them...

    • Amen brother. Republicans are too stupid and play by the "rules". We need to remember that the Continentals won this country by not playing by these stupid "rules".

      • Right you are, Vic. It's a shame that the repubs so easily and seemingly eagerly throw elections away. McCain is a prime example, not even being able to beat a commie. I firmly believe Palin could've won that one for him if his team would have just turned her loose. Nonetheless, I'm guardedly optimistic for Nov. 2. Very guarded, very optimistic.

  • There's a tsunami coming in November and it's going to sweep away a lot of Democrats

    and a few rino's too.