Rolling Stone backs off from UVA rape story. Tune in next issue for an imaginary abortion and an article about how if she’d had an imaginary gun she might have prevented the imaginary rape.
Rolling Stone backs off from UVA rape story
Rolling Stone backs off from UVA rape story. Tune in next issue for an imaginary abortion and an article about how if she’d had an imaginary gun she might have prevented the imaginary rape.
This website uses cookies.
View Comments (4)
Well you got people on the left who LIE their asses off for the cause, and the storied never make sense and there is no evidence...Just like Lena Dunham more political buillshit, now the Rolling Stone looks like complete assholes..It happens when you just write the story looking for your 15 minutes of fame without checking the facts..."Facts? We don't need no stinkin' facts!"
It is the seriousness of the charges, not the veracity of the claims that is important.
Why are lefties thought so 'intelligent' when they can't seem to be able to square facts with their views?
If a conservative person made stuff up like this about being attacked by soome kind of minority, it would discredit any accusation by anyone for the next decade. Like the Wilson defensive shooting, they don't care about the reality and the specific facts, because they know that there is a problem and who is guilty.
I bet 'Barry One' is happy to have some company.
Why write these pieces when charges could still be filed???
Why do we treat sexual assaults on college campuses as some kind of 'special' crime? If a 20 year old woman is assaulted in a party in a housing complex and it is not affiliated with a university there is no sub-legal proceeding that goes on. Why are police involved only off campus? Why do we have this separate 'Sharia Law' on college campuses?
You want to stop crime, put people in prison. Instead, on college campuses incidents happen and it is handled like some kind of offense like chewing gum in class or cheating on an exam.
Why does the left and women accept this legal 'outsourcing' to universities.
I understand a university can be a small city, well then hold those people accountable for running a real judicial system.
The only question now is 'Will this retraction make the Nightly News?' (as if you didn't already know the answer).
Huh? News? Retraction? What are you talking about?