Science: GOP voters better informed, open-minded. All they really needed to do is read some of the comments made by libtards who visit IHTM.
Science: GOP voters better informed, open-minded. All they really needed to do is read some of the comments made by libtards who visit IHTM.
This website uses cookies.
View Comments (18)
This article is fun! I wish I would have read it a few days ago on Daily when I saw it pop up, it would have made me smile then too. :)
And we go to Cracker Barrel once a month or so for breakfast. Too funny!
I especially liked the part when they stated that GOP members were more likely to be employed. Kinda sums it all up, now dosen't it.
But they must have used soft science to manipulate that number, tight? YAWN!
Betcha this is one science that won't be declared "settled".
Keep in mind that "soft science" is not as concrete as "hard science".
Soft Science, Hard Science, Medium well done Science, kinda Mushy Science....Make up shit Science, The libturds will use anything to further their agenda....What ever happened to science without an agenda, you know when scientists actually told the truth instead of making shit up?
Now I suppose that climate nut will wanna burn down my house since I don't agree with his version of climate warming bullshit.
Liberals don't really worry to much about science because they first come up with what the outcome is that they desire then they assemble the thesis to fit the outcome. See how easy that is?
They do that with politics too. The argument seems to always be a moving target to suit the given situation. Take the whole birth control nonissue for an example.
Hard Science never lies if the analysis and experiments are done correctly. Regarding climate warming the data is there to show inconsistencies with the warmists agenda. However they choose to overlook some data or flat out ignore it.
Referring back to my previous post I mentioned that there was a difference between hard science and soft science because soft science is hard to separate from the participant. In that essence many of these soft science tests have a greater bias than "hard science".
Only the hard scientists lie..........
Thats how papers get retracted my friend.
science tartar
half-baked science.
lol this is fun too.
Soft mushy brains don't deal well with hard science.
May I ask why my comment was downvoted?
Because rather than accept the science, or show evidence to its falsehood, you simply denigrated it, saying it basically wasn't "real" science. Very Arrogant, very rude, and veryinsulting.
sa_rose:
Here is my original statement: "Keep in mind that “soft science” is not as concrete as “hard science”.
There is a difference between hard and soft science. Here is some background on the difference between the two:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hard_and_soft_science
What i meant by my that statement is that soft science, as you should know, is more opened to biases then hard science.
all science is open to confirmation bias, so that dog won't hunt.
sure, go ahead.