Top climate expert’s sensational claim of government meddling in crucial UN report

Top climate expert’s sensational claim of government meddling in crucial UN report. “He was one of only two scientists present, surrounded by ‘45 or 50’ government officials. He said almost all of them made clear that ‘any text that was considered inconsistent with their interests and positions in multilateral negotiations was treated as unacceptable.’” How the settled politicized science gets settled.

Bonfire of the Absurdities: After 35 year career writing software for IBM mainframes, am now self-employed contractor thinking of joining a union and striking for higher wages. Cured morbid fear of heights when I learned to look at them as lengths standing on end. Uncompromising in refusal to accept browser cookies. Amateur investor who has accumulated a small fortune in the market after starting out years ago with a large one. For recreation, I run, hike, kayak and play tennis but will not consider synchronized swimming under any circumstances.

View Comments (11)

  • When I referenced the NIPCC report I was attacked by all the IPCC supporters who didn't once bother to look at the science. Instead it was all invective and the total rejection of any differing empirical data. Some of these IPCC sources were quite "legitimate science" sources, but the true analysis of the science was lacking. There is total acceptance of the "consensus", therefore, in these peoples minds, no more science discussion is warranted. No careful examination of the facts takes place.

    IPCC scientists are "peer reviewed", but any peer review that takes issue with the data presented or the conclusions drawn is rejected out of hand, with great invective and hate. Some of the studies cited in the IPCC report are, on the surface, just bold-faced crap, dig deeper and there is an obvious political agenda.

  • It's not science. It is computer models, well really excel spreadsheets.

    1. None of the models are regressive. IOW, they can't explain the past.
    2. None of the models have made a correct prediction.

    AGW is a cult based on hate, fear, and power. AGW is as far away from science as islam, surprisingly another death cult.

  • Anything coming out of the U.N. is very suspect.... The movie Airplane had more believable moments than anything that runs out of the back of the U.N.

  • This just proves what we've know all along, the IPCC is and has been fudging the data in their mad quest for power and control.

  • Finally some scientists are breaking ranks with the alarmist dogma. This guy isn't really a climate scientist, but still, it's monumental what we're hearing about the pathetic IPCC process.

    • The whole "Global Warming/Climate Change" movement was never about climate. It is about control, & redistribution. They get caught all the time fixing the numbers, & those who support it, including the global MSM, don't seem to mind. It's total corruption & needs to be treated as such.

      • Lying to get what you want is a leftist pattern. I actually know leftists who defend the idea that there's nothing wrong with lying to people if it results in something positive in the end... and that's exactly what they think redistribution is.

        • That's the beauty of moral relativism. There is no judging, no standards, and everything is permissible.

          • Ah, Nietzsche. Sort of like the eco-wackos who believe it is ok to chop and cook birds as long as it is in the name of the "religion" of mother jones; yet harm a worthless piece of shit on death row...

          • Well, since the admin are the ones who under normal circumstances, would be the ones who would be prosecuting these trolls, but the trolls work for the admin, when does it be permissible for us to take them all down? I for one, am getting real tired of trying to play an honest game with a marked and stacked deck.