UN climate chief declares communism best for fighting global warming. Yep, those communist countries certainly know how to clear the air of CO2 pollution.
This post was last modified on April 10, 2021
UN climate chief declares communism best for fighting global warming. Yep, those communist countries certainly know how to clear the air of CO2 pollution.
This post was last modified on April 10, 2021
This website uses cookies.
View Comments (19)
here's an idea--let's move the UN building to Beijing so she can be breathe that "right way" air all day long
Why the F*ck are we still even in this organization? If we are gonna support a mental hospital this size in New York and pay 22 billion a year to the inmates, we should be able to send them home, shut the place down and steal the lightbulbs and office furniture....
I've got dibs on the 100 watt bulbs!!
Once again, they show the foundation for their entire philosophy -
we have our theories, and we are right. When the facts show that their theories do not work in the real world, it's the world that is wrong and must be changed.
This is the basis for what is laughably passed off as education. It is the basis for every economic move they ever make. And it is the basis for their efforts to "save the planet".
Never mind the well-documented facts that the air was so polluted in communist Poland that the concrete carvings (for lack of a better word - you know, all those gargoyles and stuff you see on really old buildings), were dissolving. Lake Baikal, which holds something like 20% of the world's fresh water, was getting so polluted so fast that it was estimated to be a matter of a couple of decades until it became a dead lake. We now hear stories of entire villages of people in China literally poisoned. In Africa, where trade in ivory is legal, elephant populations are growing. Where it's banned, elephant populations are approachig zero.
But their theories tell them that it's profit and free market that pollute, and only guv force can save the planet. And the "know" they are right, so no real need to actually do any observation (#1 step in the Scientific Method).
So ...
Forward!
What the UN Climate Thug meant to say is that Communism is best at extorting carbon credit cash out of the masses.
And liquidating those who won't go along. A couple of hundred million dead is a clear warning.
That haze over Beijing is nothing, nothing at all. When the citizens are wearing M95 mask to protect their lungs, pollution might be an issue.
Anyone surprised?
This is easy to believe as the main goal of AGW is to enslave the world to communism. Thus the circle is squared.
As to leaving the UN, I say no way. We keep our veto and we just throttle down the payments to the den of thieves to what France pays.
Just another reason to drop out of the UN(as if we needed any more).
When do we get to the reason to nuke the UN?
Would a suitcase nuke be acceptable?
ANYTHING, as long as they're gone!
I got a suitcase.
Meanwhile, in Beijing where they are "doing it right" they are unable to breathe: http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/A/AS_CHINA_AIR_POLLUTION?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2014-01-16-02-52-44
Proves to me green = red.