Uncle Onyango Obama arrested for DUI after almost slamming into police car. Yes, it’s President Obama’s uncle. Will US Attorney General Eric Holder launch an investigation to see if this was a racist police car while conveniently forgetting Uncle Onyango is an illegal alien? How about another beer summit? Nah! Might result in another DUI.
This post was last modified on August 28, 2011
View Comments (120)
Maybe you could show where I have been drunk?
ASSHAT!
******************
Poor Poopajoe----thinks it's clever to accuse Obama of being drunk, but can't handle being on the receiving end of the same accusation.
Why so defensive, Poopajoe?
Maybe because you have absolutely NO evidence that he even drinks, much less is drunk, whereas we HAVE evidence of Obama doing cocaine. You accusation is libelous (or is it slander? I can never keep those straight.)
Maybe because you have absolutely NO evidence that he even drinks, much less is drunk, whereas we HAVE evidence of Obama doing cocaine. You accusation is libelous (or is it slander? I can never keep those straight.)
*****************
You're getting melodramatic again, Rose. Poopajoe made the insinuation that he knows that more than one Obama is a "drunk;" I gave it right back to him, in the form of drunk Poopajoes. And he got offended.
As you can see, he's a lot better at dishing it out than he is at taking it. ;)
I gave it right back to him, in the form of drunk Poopajoes. And he got offended.
Wrong again asshat. I just asked you to show where I've been drunk. Since you always ask for evidence of what we say, I figure it's fair to do the same to you.
libel....it is written.. Slander is verbal. :D
Then Olivia is most likely guilty of both libel AND slander, since she was talking to herself as she typed it. Nobody else will listen to her.
Thanks! :P
SARCASM alert: I don't know much about this case, but I think it is safe to say that the Police acted stupidly!
Bet he got 50 kids running around just like his brother. Somebody please deport his sorry ass, the last thing this country needs is anymore Obamas.
the last thing this country needs is anymore Obamas.
Well, at least anymore drunk Obamas
You are right poppajoe. We had enough when Bush's daughter got in trouble for drinking and having a fake I.D.
Cause no other teen or 20-something on the planet has done that except the evil Bush daughter, right? Puhleeze.
Because college kids never do that. Your moral equivalencies are stupid. Stop embarrassing yourself.
So that makes it ok then? Does every college student do that?
Stop having a bias point of view. I do believe that both Obama and Bush have their own personal share of troubles and hypocrisies.
On a different note Chelsea Clinton or any of Bill Clinton's relatives never appeared in any trouble if my memory serves.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Hey, I know you are just flailing around but this thread is about Obama's illegal alien uncle getting a DUI. WTF is your point about the Bush family?
By the way, Clinton did have a bit of trouble. Her name was Monica Lewinsky and he was impeached. Damn, are you that forgetful?
Hey, I know you are just flailing around but this thread is about Obama’s illegal alien uncle getting a DUI. WTF is your point about the Bush family?
************
Wow! You really ARE a concrete thinker, aren't you? This is the third analogy today that's sailed right over your head.
TURDZ!
Olivia, are you sure I wrote that post? Retard. I only get excited about analogies that make sense. You, on the other hand, do not know what sense is.
She doesn't know who she is talking to, much less what they wrote. Shoot, she doesn't even know what she wrote. How many times have I included her very words (copied and pasted) from her posts just to have her claim to not know what I was refering to?
She was responding to someone's post this morning and accusing me of being the author.
What does Obama's HALF uncle have to do with his presidency? Absolutely nothing. Obama has no control over his HALF uncle. I brought up Bush's daughter to illustrate the absurdity of this topic.
Gee, John. How about this: He has nothing to with his presidency but the fact that a sitting US president has had at least two illegal aliens living in Massachusetts is newsworthy and speaks volumes about our immigration system.
I should have added two illegal alien RELATIVES living in Massachusetts...
turd
We could do with a few less drunk Poopajoes as well.
Poopajoe, that's a good one. I appreciate the way you conduct yourself so maturely, being twice my age and all. How progressive of you!
LOL David!
Maybe you could show where I have been drunk?
ASSHAT!
2 HAT TRICKS! Great way to start the week. ;)
The uncle acted stupidly.
No acting involved.
The only thing I took away from the beer summit was that the cop had good taste . . . Blue Moon is not bad at all!
Well, he is an Obama.
Obama himself is an illegal. That's why he loves the mexicans so much and put them above Americans.
Well you know, "Birds of a feather".
This is the 1 thing the Obama family has in common with the Kennedy's. Obama's father was into boozin' & cruising, & in fact, was killed, while driving drunk in 1982 in Nairobi.
Sounds almost like former President Bush. Looks like having an alcohol problem, a DUI and a cocaine problem aren't major concerns to conservatives.
Honestly I could care less if Obama bumped to his little heart's content. In a perfect world he and W. would be held to the same standards. But it is not a perfect world and if the man's private behavior doesn't harm me then I don't feel that I have the need to judge it.
KH: "if the man’s private behavior doesn’t harm me then I don’t feel that I have the need to judge it."
That's the point, KH. As a taxpayer and productive, law abiding citizen you ARE being harmed in an indirect manner, and you DO have the Right to ask questions about unethical behavior by your leaders.
How can a president ask legal aliens to turn in or not harbor illegal aliens when he is harboring them in his own family? How can a president tell business that they will be subject to legal action for utilizing an iilegal workforce for the same reason?
How can a president tell the public that it is their civic duty to go deep in debt to help the welfare state, when there are clearly members of his own family who are in need of assistance and he is not helping them in any way?
How can a president ask law abiding Muslims to speak out against those doing wrong within and around their family and community, when the president himself does not abide by the same rule of law within his own family, no matter how far removed?
It's a question of many different eyes and groups seeing the on-going pattern of personal, unethical behavior on the part of this president, and that hurts us all.
If you voted for Obama his admitted past cocaine use obviously wasn't a major concern to you.
At least he was honest about it instead of dodging the question like President Bush. Not to mention, President Bush must have strong morals if he allowed his father to wipe his cocaine charge off his record. Besides Obama only used Cocaine as an undergrad. He didn't abuse alcohol up until he was 40 like President Bush.
How do you know for sure Obama stopped using Cocaine as an undergrad?
How do you know for sure Obama stopped using Cocaine as an undergrad?
********************
We don't. But, then again, we also don't know for sure that Laura Bush isn't a cocaine abuser.
Before you start going into hysterics, I wasn't serious with that last remark----just reminding you that, if you think Obama used cocaine as an adult, your belief is motivated more by wishful thinking than facts or logic.
I've worked with cocaine addicts. Most of them were failing in just about every area of their lives, because steady cocaine abuse will do that to you. Obama, in contrast, graduated extremely well from one of the finest law schools in the world. And he didn't even have a rich and politically connected Daddy to pull strings for him.
If he was able to do that AND abuse cocaine simultaneously, either he really IS the superman you righties seem to think he is, or he has the most powerful self control I've ever seen.
;)
Actually, as you point out later in your post, the signs of a cocaine abuser are readily identified. I don't see any of those signs in Mrs. Bush. ERGO yes, I DO know she is not abusing cocaine.
Actually, as you point out later in your post, the signs of a cocaine abuser are readily identified. I don’t see any of those signs in Mrs. Bush. ERGO yes, I DO know she is not abusing cocaine.
******************
And, again, you totally missed the point of my analogy. Not for one second do I think Laura Bush is a cocaine abuser.
Not for one second do I think Barack Obama is, either.
Slowlivia: "We don’t. But, then again, we also don’t know for sure that Laura Bush isn’t a cocaine abuser."
What? You're allowed to make some half-assed "joking" comment about LB, but when factual evidence is presented that BHO's own family were living in the country illegally AND on the welfare dime, it's "racist sniping" to make mention of that fact in either a serious or equally "joking" tone as yours? The Slowlivia double standard strikes again!
BHO and MO were dragging in around half a mil between them while they were "helping the poor" of Chicago find their way. If these 2 couldn't find a way, or even cared enough, to help members of their own family get on the right track with what brainpower and financial backing that was available to them personally, how in the WORLD is it to be believed by anyone in either Party that BHO had access to a formula which would be of assistance to either his Chicago constituents, or the poor of an entire nation?
Slowlivia: “We don’t. But, then again, we also don’t know for sure that Laura Bush isn’t a cocaine abuser.”
What? You’re allowed to make some half-assed “joking” comment about LB,
********************
Wrong. I didn't say anything about it being a "joking" remark"----I said it wasn't serious.
The Laura Bush remark was meant to illustrate how unfair it is make unfounded speculations about public figures. And, as usual, you were so eager to come out swinging that the analogy went right over your head. Just as the analogy about racism on the right went right over your head, on the "religion of peace" thread.
************************
but when factual evidence is presented that BHO’s own family were living in the country illegally AND on the welfare dime, it’s “racist sniping” to make mention of that fact in either a serious or equally “joking” tone as yours? The Slowlivia double standard strikes again!
**********************
No, what's "racist sniping" is trying to use the shortcomings of someone who shares DNA with Obama to smear Obama himself. I've noticed that the old saw, "Birds of a feather flock together" is very trendy among the far right of late. Especially when they're eager to smear Obama with the bad choices that someone else, who has any kind of a connection to him (no matter how slender), once made.
************************
BHO and MO were dragging in around half a mil between them while they were “helping the poor” of Chicago find their way. If these 2 couldn’t find a way, or even cared enough, to help members of their own family get on the right track with what brainpower and financial backing that was available to them personally, how in the WORLD is it to be believed by anyone in either Party that BHO had access to a formula which would be of assistance to either his Chicago constituents, or the poor of an entire nation?
********************
I guess nobody got around to telling you that Obama's paternal relatives were complete strangers to him throughout most of his life, as was his father.
It's a little far fetched for you to refer to them as "his own family," let alone expect him and his wife, to take personal, legal and financial responsibility for them, don't you think?
It's also downright socialist of you, to take the attitude that, because the Obamas were supposedly "dragging in around half a mil between them," it means that shirttail relations, who don't even know them, are entitled to a part of their income and the lion's share of their professional efforts. Don't you righties believe in affluent people being entitled to CHOOSE where their money and effort goes? Or is it only REPUBLICANS that you think should be allowed to make such choices? :D
Your slip is showing, Kick. ;)
“Your slip is showing, Kick. ”
Your age is showing Olivia, well, your age and the effects of all the drugs you did in the 70's.
"Your slip is showing, Kick. "
Maybe. But I did not write the post. Dumb ass!!! I am sure Bean will defend his argument when he has a chance.
I love the moments when you go full retard.
Oh, yeah... Full Retard Power! Go for throttle up. Sometimes the little things are funniest.
LOL, that's twice now that she has done that.
I don't know for sure but he did mentioned he used it in college so I assume it was just exclusive. Either way I can care less if he continue after he graduated. He has no criminal record and it doesn't seemed to interfere with his life in an extreme negative way.
When you assume you make an ass out of u and me. Except I am not making that assumption. Bill Clinton smoked grass, and if the truth were known, probably 75% or better of people who were in college/the military in the late 60's and onward are using drugs. Bush has made it very clear that he accepts responsibility for his drinking, and that he has now stopped. He shows no signs of continuing to drink, ao what is your problem? At least booze is legal. THirds
The problem is President Bush REFUSES to answer to the cocaine allegation. I wonder why...
Actually, he DID respond at the time of the accusations. He stated he had not done cocaine. Now aside from that, these allegations suddenly appeared ONE WEEK before the 2000 election. The were simply allegations, there was no smoking gun, no alleged witnesses, much less proof. And every site I looked at that claimed it was true was a left wing site. Do ya think this may have been a smear tactic on the part of the left, since Al Gore ws losing his ass? No, of course you wouldn't. Had there been any real evidence of use, abuse, or even arrest for cocaine, SOMEONE would have found it. Instead, there is a vast network of allegations, without one shred of factual inofrmation to even point to his use of cocaine. Jeez!
Can you cite a source that confirms Bush denying the allegation? As far as I know he dodged the questions similarly to how he dodged the drug test for the national guard.
Very Presidential.
What difference does it make NOW? He is a private citizen. Further, anyone can allege anything. I wouldn't respond to a baseless allegation either.
This cocaine allegation came out during 2004 i believe or maybe sooner.
It isn't hard to say "no". I will compliment Bush and say he is an honest person which precisely explains why he danced around the questions.
This is the 1 thing the Obama family has in common with the Kennedy’s. Obama’s father was into boozin’ & cruising, & in fact, was killed, while driving drunk in 1982 in Nairobi.
*********************
This is one reason I love checking out this website: so many Obamaphobes grasping at straws to use every excuse, no matter how lame, no matter how ridiculous, to discredit a popular and effective president.
Do none of you people have shirttail relations (or even close relations) who've EVER been arrested for drunk driving? If you do, what bearing does his/her bad behavior have on YOUR ability to do your job well? :D
You are funny Ollie, you really are. Unemployment in this country has not been this high since Jimmy "The Peanut" Carter was President. In fact, he has now been downgraded to the number two spot as the worst President in modern history. You can guess who now holds the number one spot. That's real effectiveness for you.
Popular you say? Even with the unions, gooberment employees and welfare recipients, polls put him at less than 50% in the popularity contest. Take them out of the equasion and his numbers would drop down to about the same level as the opinion polls of our Senate and House. You have to remember he was elected by a mere 52% of the voting public, not exactly a landslide.
He said Gitmo would be shut down. It is still there. He said we would get out of Iran and Afganistan. Our soldiers are still there. He has not done one damn thing he said he was going to do. Popular and effective? I don't think so. He is a bobble-head toy on the dashboard of a car. The problem is we do not know who is driving the car but we do know where it is taking our country and the majority of Americans do not like it.
Do none of you people have shirttail relations (or even close relations) who’ve EVER been arrested for drunk driving?
No, in fact I have NO relations or even friends that have ever been arrested for drunk driving. How about you?
Do none of you people have shirttail relations (or even close relations) who’ve EVER been arrested for drunk driving?
No, in fact I have NO relations or even friends that have ever been arrested for drunk driving. How about you?
********************
Yes, I do. (I suspect you do, too, but just won't admit it here.) But I'm emotionally healthy enough to realize that the poor judgment of some shirttail relation doesn't reflect on me or my character in any way.
Bigots, of course, especially those who still believe in Nazi-era eugenics, might feel differently.
Yes, I do. (I suspect you do, too, but just won’t admit it here.)
Dumbass, I have no reason to hide such things. You obviously have nothing, so you're making up shit about me.
Nazi-era eugenics
Something else the left can claim as theirs!
"Bigots, of course, especially those who still believe in Nazi-era eugenics, might feel differently."
Olivia, you are the Margaret Sanger supporter here. Projecting again, obviously. You are more screwed up than normal this morning and are making no sense to any sane person.
Bigots, of course, especially those who still believe in Nazi-era eugenics, might feel differently.”
Olivia, you are the Margaret Sanger supporter here.
*****************
When did I ever state or imply that I agree with every single thing Margaret Sanger ever believed in during her life? ;)
My point all along has been that it isn't Washington's business to interfere in a woman's reproductive decisions. Which has absolutely nothing to do with Margaret Sanger, or how I feel or don't feel about her views.
YOU'RE the one trying to drag genetics into this discussion, suggesting that affluent Americans should be obligated to share their wealth with anyone who (regardless of circumstances) happens to share DNA with them. Or does that only apply to affluent Americans whom you dislike, resent and envy?
Thirds.
Sorry, retard, you brought up eugenics for no reason and you are the only pro-abortion advocate here. Now go debate yourself on that tired tangent.
And probably very few insane ones!
Obummer must have a full-time document forger working for him and his relatives. If his uncle is illegal, how did he get a license? Was the SUV he was driving a Canadian vehicle like the million-dollar buses?
He probably rented a shack in New Mexico to prove residency. That's all it takes in this sorry damn state for anyone to get a drivers license. Rent receipts, utility bills for three months, presto! Anyone can get a legal drivers license!
Thankfully we now have a Governor, Susana Martinez, who is trying to get this law signed by former governor Bill Richardson recinded. She understands that this is not only a state issue, it is a national security issue. We cannot allow every Tom, Jose, Muhammed or Onyango to get a legal drivers license from any state unless they are legal residents of the state and our country.
All it took for my lady to get her New Mexico license was to show that her 11 state nursing license was valid in New Mexico. We live in California, and have never even spent a night in New Mexico. But then again, she IS a legal resident and citizen in this country.
Obummer must have a full-time document forger working for him and his relatives. If his uncle is illegal, how did he get a license?
***************************
There are three possibilities that I can see:
1) He got one illegally
2) He didn't have a driver's license
3) He was driving on a foreign license
Since we don't (yet) have any information as to which one of the above is true, it's pointless to make guesses. Including wild eyed theories about the president of the United States (1) being in on the whole thing, and (2) employing "full time document forger(s)."
"Bigots, of course, especially those who still believe in Nazi-era eugenics, might feel differently."
ROFLMAO! A state powerful enough to develop or enforce eugenics laws is far beyond anything my minarchist loving heart could ever fathom supporting. Nice try Oblivia . . . but you're the one that supports the states authority to control my body . . . not me.
Driving on a foreign license for 11 years? I'm pretty sure THAT is illegal as well. One has to update one's address on a license whenever one moves. Most licenses are only good for about 6 years, max. Did he LIE to renew his license?
Obama and his friends and relatives are above the law. We are now a nation of Men and not of Law!
Well this deserves some taxpayer money. Maybe welfare, or SSDI, maybe some section 8. If we don't we will be racist.
Well this deserves some taxpayer money. Maybe welfare, or SSDI, maybe some section 8. If we don’t we will be racist.
*****************
Congratulations, IHTM administrators-----you finally got someone to take your bait.
Now, all together, let's all start whining about how the REAL victims of discrimination in our society are wealthy white Protestant right wing males.
OMG, you are stupid!
Wait a minute poppajoe, other than the "wealthy" part Ollie has made a good point! By a huge majority, who is the biggest wage earner and taxpayer in this country? White males. Protestant, Baptist, Catholic, right wing, left wing, none of that matters.
By a huge majority, who is crowding our prisons, living on the public dime unwilling to earn their way or take care of their families? Non-white males. Protestant, Baptist, Catholic, right wing, left wing, none of that matters.
All together now, lets start whining. White, Black, Brown or Yellow, it does not matter, if you are a wage earner and a taxpayer whine as loud as you can. Any religion, no religion, right wing, left wing, none of it matters. If you are a wage earner and taxpayer whine as loud as you can.
Maybe then fools like our dear Ollie will get the message. Quit taking money out of our pockets, away from our family, to give to those to lazy to earn their own way. Because, in reality, we are the REAL victims of discrimination in our society.
His aunt is an illegal, who is in public housing in the Boston area. She should be deported, but she won't, & we know why.
Exactly. She was already supposed to be deported, never left, and when the judge reviewing the case found out she was Obama's Aunt., she was not only allowed to stay, but to stay in governmant housing, receiving government benefits because her cheapskate Nephew gives her nothing. This same Nephew is the one who assures the American public that illegal aliens never get governemnt assistance.
Exactly. She was already supposed to be deported, never left, and when the judge reviewing the case found out she was Obama’s Aunt., she was not only allowed to stay, but to stay in governmant housing, receiving government benefits because her cheapskate Nephew gives her nothing.
************************
Hey, Rose, if you have evidence that the judge acted improperly in this case, why don't you bring it to the authorities immediately?
Oh, that's right----you DON'T have evidence. You're merely making wild guesses, based on what you want to believe. And what you want to believe, apparently, is that (1) Obama would get mad if his aunt were deported, and (2) Obama doesn't care what happens to his aunt.
Bit of an inconsistency there?
1) She was in the US illegally. She was caught, went to court, and received a deportation order.
2) she eluded the deportation and remained in the country.
3) she was located a few years later, living in public housing
4) she pulled the Obama is my nephew card.
5) The judge that reviewed the case reversed the deportation decidion, and allowed her to remain in the country.
6) Obama provides nothing toward her support, so she is still living in goverment housing, receiving welfare and food stamps. She has reapplied for asylum in the US
From the Boston Globe:
Onyango, who turns 58 this month, came to the United States in 2000 seeking a better life and applied for political asylum in 2002, but was rejected in 2004 and ordered to leave the country.
Instead, she remained undetected until just before Election Day, when she was discovered living quietly in Boston. Because of the publicity, she fled to stay with relatives in Cleveland. There, she hired Wong, who filed a new petition to reopen her case. Shapiro agreed to reopen Onyango’s case in December 2008. His decision was expected by May 25.
She broke the law by refusing to leave when ordered.
http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2010/05/18/obamas_aunt_is_granted_asylum/?page=full
Kick, I didn't ask for evidence that she was living here illegally. I asked for evidence that the judge acted improperly in granting her asylum.
He reversed his deportation order when she turned out to be Obama's aunt. Think I could get out of jail based on who one of MY relatives is? Doubt it.
I don't give a rat's ass what you asked for. The hearing never should have occurred in the first place. She was ordered to leave before her nephew gained prominence. She defied the law and remained here illegally. Did the judge act improperly? According to the article, this judge previously rejected 67% of similar requests for asylum. I was not there and neither were you but she was to leave years prior and she did not. She was a criminal.
Onyango, who turns 58 this month, came to the United States in 2000 seeking a better life and applied for political asylum in 2002, but was rejected in 2004 and ordered to leave the country.
Rejected in 2004, stayed illegally against court order until discovered in 2008, that is being here illegally, contempt of court, and defying a court order. Anyone else would have been arrested and put in jail until they could be deported.
But all that means to our resident Obama apologist is "I asked for evidence that the judge acted improperly in granting her asylum."
Multiple crimes comitted and she gets asylum, AFTER her nephew wins the Presidential election? If that doesn't smell fishy to you, you better get your nose checked!
Bit of an inconsistency there?
Only in your thought process, but then we've come to expect that from you.
He will probably never be deported. Remember "O" just opened the door for illegals to stay now. They quit deporting them unless they commit a BAD crime. They've already commited a crime being here illegally, or so I thought. So basically, "O" just SPIT in the faces of every immigrant that came here legally and went through the legal process. He has granted AMNESTY to every illegal here. Meanwhile they will mooch all the freebies from the gubment at the taxpayers expense. This president needs to be impeached immediately. But do we see ANYONE in congress going after him? NO! They are all his puppets. I hope next election we can put some people in congress that will work for the CITIZENS.
He will probably never be deported. Remember “O” just opened the door for illegals to stay now. They quit deporting them unless they commit a BAD crime.
****************************
Which new federal law are you referring to, Lizard?
Oh, he bypassed the law-this decision is by Presidential fiat..
FIAT = Fix it again Tony. Very appropriate where Obama is concerned.
No law, just a Presidential decree. Typical of Obama, working around the process to get his way.
Do try to keep up!
By Associated Press, Published: August 18
WASHINGTON — The Obama administration said Thursday it will allow many illegal immigrants facing deportation the chance to stay in this country and apply for a work permit, while focusing on removing from the U.S. convicted criminals and those who might be a national security or public safety threat.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/us-plans-to-make-it-a-priority-to-deport-illegal-immigrants-who-are-convicted-criminals/2011/08/18/gIQAxKHxNJ_story.html
No law, just a Presidential decree. Typical of Obama, working around the process to get his way.
Do try to keep up!
By Associated Press, Published: August 18
WASHINGTON — The Obama administration said Thursday it will allow many illegal immigrants facing deportation the chance to stay in this country and apply for a work permit, while focusing on removing from the U.S. convicted criminals and those who might be a national security or public safety threat.
*****************
Gosh, Poopajoe, I don't see anything here about OBAMA creating this law, which is what the original poster was claiming.
I'm afraid you're likely to see a great deal more of this type of legislation in the future, since the far right is putting the screws to the government to slash expenses. Did you think we could address the deficit effectively JUST by cutting programs to the poor, the disabled, the elderly and uninsured? No, we're ALL going to be feeling the pinch for years to come....which, in your case, means having to put up with hearing dark skinned people speaking Spanish in front of you, without being able to get them arrested.
Desperate times call for desperate measures, you know.......
(trying to be patient) THat is because there IS NO LAW. The President issued a decree regarding immigration and amnesty. Never saw the inside of the Congressional buidling. Must of the decree is based in the DREAM act, despite massive voter objection- so he bypassed the voters, their presumed representatives, and did it all by himself. Since the President can't enact law (only Congress can) One might think this is illegal and unConstitutional.
(trying to be patient) THat is because there IS NO LAW. The President issued a decree regarding immigration and amnesty. Never saw the inside of the Congressional buidling. Must of the decree is based in the DREAM act, despite massive voter objection- so he bypassed the voters, their presumed representatives, and did it all by himself.
********************
Uh.....Rose? The DREAM Act IS Congressional legislation, designed to promote the very practices that you're accusing Obama of "decreeing all by himself."
And, by the way, acts of Congress are not subject to popular vote, no matter who is sitting in the Oval Office. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Act_of_Congress
Wikipedia? You call THAT a source? Any fly by night moron can post there! Oh, wait. . . gotcha, you WOULD see that as appropriate. And no, the DREAM act is NOT law. It never passed, no matter how much delusional far lefties would like to think. Obama made up this baby all by his little self.
C'mon genius, where is your witty refutation? You are so amusing as every time you venture away from opinion and into what you think are facts you display ignorance and arrogance in ways that are really funny. "... DREAM Act IS Congressional legislation." LMAO. Earlier you were pretty quick with the replies. Of course that was when you didn't know you were wrong. We did though and always do.
Full retard.
Uhh, Dumb ass the Dream Act was killed in the Senate because the Dems could not get enough support. Obama "backdoored" it by executive fiat.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/12/18/senate-tries-pass-dream-act/
http://blog.heritage.org/2011/08/19/backdoor-amnesty-abusing-the-constitution-and-presidential-authority/
You are still going full retard I see. Bad day?
You are still going full retard I see. Bad day?
Seems like a normal day to me.
I know you won't believe SK's sources, so here is one from your favorite source.
Obama Amnesty Begins: Halts Deportations for 300,000 Illegal Aliens; Offers ‘Work Permits’
Stand With Arizona ^ | August 18, 2011 | John Hill--Stand With Arizona
Posted on Thursday, August 18, 2011 5:42:59 PM by LUV W
The Obama Administration today announced a virtual amnesty-by-decree for hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens, whose deportations will be “indefinitely delayed”. In addition, Obama finally announced a jobs program – but for ILLEGAL ALIENS, not citizens – as those 300,000 illegals will also become eligible for “work permits“.
This action represents an administrative end-run around Congress, which twice rejected the ‘DREAM Act’ in 2010. As disgraceful as is this usurpation of Congressional authority, this announcement is even worse than is being reported.”
From the Huffington Post
I don’t see anything here about OBAMA creating this law, which is what the original poster was claiming.
You are confusing yourself! THERE IS NO LAW, IT IS WORKING AROUND THE LAW!!!
Bowing to pressure from immigrant rights activists, the Obama administration said Thursday that it will halt deportation proceedings on a case-by-case basis against illegal immigrants who meet certain criteria, such as attending school, having family in the military or having primary responsible for other family members’ care.
The move marks a major step for President Obama, who for months has said he does not have broad categorical authority to halt deportations and said he must follow the laws as Congress has written them.