Vagina 2012

Vagina 2012. “Vote with your vagina. Vote for Barak (sic) Obama. If you have a vagina or love someone who does, share this video.” Not the vagina but another orifice in the neighborhood would be a more apropos subject for this video, we suspect. The orifice more likely to vote for “Barak,” if you catch our drift.

This post was last modified on January 26, 2021

Bonfire of the Absurdities: After 35 year career writing software for IBM mainframes, am now self-employed contractor thinking of joining a union and striking for higher wages. Cured morbid fear of heights when I learned to look at them as lengths standing on end. Uncompromising in refusal to accept browser cookies. Amateur investor who has accumulated a small fortune in the market after starting out years ago with a large one. For recreation, I run, hike, kayak and play tennis but will not consider synchronized swimming under any circumstances.

View Comments (73)

  • I am so grossed out by that. Seriously. I am depressed that anyone would portray herself in such a way, and I am really disgusted that vaginas are even a talking point. These creepy womenl say "leave my lady parts alone" and then they go out there and put them practically in neon lights. Confused much?

  • So according to this gay men will only vote for Obama if they don't plan on marrying someone with a vagina. Good deal. I'm sure Roms will be glad to know he is getting Bary's vote this year.

  • A perfect representation of what organ the typical liberal thinks with. I guess their new motto should be "If it feels good, vote with it"

  • Ahh, the democrat party voting with their vajayjay's instead of their hearts. By golly, that's CHANGE, obama's finally done it! FORWARD now, lead with your clit*s.

  • Why does the left insist on reducing us to our lady parts? Sorry, but I like to think of myself as so much more than just that.

  • A vagina is a reproductive organ, not an entertainment center. It's connected to a womb... in which a human being is created. If you make sex into a hobby then you're going to have to do something with the people you create - usually killing them seems to be the answer. It was the answer for the pagans who strangled theirs, ripped their heads off, left them out for wolves to eat or simply threw them into the nearest river.

    The pagans are back... like they never went away. And they're just as sex obsessed and bloodthirsty as ever.

          • *no*...recreation centers are supposed to be open to the public...not happening over here, just sayin'. >.> (daggar eyes aimed in your general direction)

          • there's community rec centers, usually wrecked, and then there are private rec centers, aka the marriage bed is undefiled.

            :P

            unless one is an RC, then it's just a procreation/potty center.

            right, or am I mistaken in RC teachings?

          • You are mistaken. Sex is also for expression of affection and intimacy, but never forget that its primary purpose is reproduction.

          • i dig.
            before the fall there was no need for procreation between Adam and Eve before the fall. Matter of fact, or so it seems, it wasn't til after the expulsion from the garden that Adam biblically knew Eve.
            But I always thought that the RC taught only procreation was/is permissible for RC adherents.
            thanks for clearing that up.

          • RC...the teaching is that sex is supposed to only happen within the context of a marriage and with the purposeful intent and hope of producing a child. So if you don't want a child...you are supposed to abstain even if you are married.....yeah, like that's gonna happen...

          • i need sleep too. I have a vote to cast and, daylight savings time has attacked me!

            oh ty for the info re: the turks Deadman.

            pleasant dreams all!

          • I think I have reached he end of my usefulness in this conversation, so I will bid you both goodnight as I will need to get up at o dark hundred in the morning...good sleepies

          • Turks have not apologised for their past genocides but, contrariwise, they tend to cause a great fuss whenever other sovereign countries raise monuments thereto. In 1973 Turkey recalled its ambassador to France to because the French established a monument to the Armenian genocide, and there are few more recent monuments in Australian states which the Turks vociferously opposed.

          • yes Deadman.
            In my understanding, the antecedent must be "Thou art the Christ, the Son of the Living God."

            Enjoyed the discussion drb.

            btw, do you or anybody here know if the turks ever recognized, let alone accepted and apologized for their genocide against the Armenian Bulgarian, and Balkanesian Christians?

            If not, then why oh why would barry be in bed with them?

          • Πέτρος is masculine and πέτρα is feminine, true; but the ταύτῃ—“this”—in ἐπὶ ταύτῃ τῇ πέτρᾳ—“upon this rock”—has to refer to a antecedent, which anyone may pardonably regard as σὺ—“thee”—namely, Peter, unless, of course, we imagine Jesus pointing at His own chest as He said “this”.
            A problem would be removed if we remember that Πέτρος is a movable or rolling stone, easily moved or thrown, whereas πέτρα is solid rock or a shelf, or even a cliff, resolute and immobile.
            So a less ambiguous translation (whilst still retaining a flavour of the wordplay), perhaps, would be: “Moreover, I say unto thee, that thou art the Stone, but upon solid rock shall I build my church, and the gates of hell will not prevail against it.”

          • Well, Robert, I think we have reached the end of my knowledge on the subject...never heard of any "petra"...don't recall that term/name being used... Priests were recruited to carry on the work of spreading the gospel as the apostles weren't going to live forever and I said they were *like* apostles not that they are apostles nor equal to apostles so I don't know what you mean by "apostolic succession"
            Peter was chosen by Jesus to be leader of the church...but that doesn't make him Jesus jr. Who ever said he couldn't be questioned, criticized or challenged?

          • "I say also unto thee [to Peter], That thou art Peter [petros, masculine gender], and upon this Rock [petra, feminine gender] I will build My church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it" (Matt. 16:18). The text indi­cates clearly that the church of Christ is built on petra and not on Petros.

            Now, who is this petra or rock on which Christ built His true church? Let the Holy Bible again give the answer. If the Bible gives the answer, we make no mistake in accepting it because the definition is authentic. "They drank of that spiritual Rock that followed them: and that Rock [petra, in the Greek] was Christ" (1 Corinthians 10:4). Here we have evidence that petra refers to Christ, and not to Peter, petros. Again we quote: "Jesus Christ Himself being the chief Cornerstone" (Ephesians 2:20) "He is the Rock, His work is perfect" (Deuteronomy 32:4; 2 Samuel 22:2-3) (Douay, 2 Kings 22:2-3).

            http://www.trustingodamerica.com/Petra.htm

            frankly I don't recall reading anything about apostolic succession. but maybe i missed something, is this something the RC can address?
            i mean, isn't the Bible witness, along with the Holy Ghost's witness, what we must depend on for instruction since Jesus is resting up in Heaven?
            How could Paul, if Peter was the first Pope, rebuke him?

          • "And I also say to you that you are Peter, and upon this rock I will build My church; and the gates of Hades shall not overpower it," Matthew 16:18

            It is believed by RC that this was Jesus' final instructions for Peter. For him to literally build a church and grow the congregation. Each apostle was to do the same with Peter as the lead guy, (the first pope if you will), they then recruited more and spread them out building more churches.

          • interesting drb, in the broadest sense the Apostles were sent out to spread the word, not to stand in a pulpit and teach, or oversee, bishop, a congregation.

            in the strictest sense, the Apostles were the 12 disciples, then another was added who had to replace the traitor, judas. And then there was Saul of Tarsus whom Jesus personally contacted and made an Apostle to the Gentiles.
            Apostles, according to my lights, are those who were with Jesus in his earthly ministry and witnessed His ascension.

          • maybe the priest are drinkin cuz they can't get married.
            here's a question, since there's only one mediator between God and Man, and Jesus is that Great High Priest, how does the RC explain priests? for confession? we're s'posed to confess one to another, at least that's what my bible says.

          • One thing not forbidden to Priest is drinking. I gave a retiring Irish Father (accent and all) an estimate about 9 one morning. He asked me if I wanted coffee I said yes. He then got out the brandy bottle and made coffee royals. :-)

          • what about the “Honey, I have a headache” method?

            Sex helps to get rid of a headache...helps you relax and away goes the stress and tension.

          • My mother taught me about that... In Catechism class we were taught only abstinence or baby. I don't know if the differences in what we were taught is due to age of the students (sixth grade at the time so I was 11 going on 12) or due to who was doing the teaching, but it is clear we were taught different things. Interesting. Still, it really doesn't matter anyway cuz we both know that it isn't a realistic expectation for a married couple to be abstinent and I think church leaders know that too.

          • They didn't tell you about "the rhythm method"? Whatever its effectiveness, it's evidence that Catholics can indeed engage in sex for affection.

          • Perhaps they teach the girls something different than they teach the boys then, cuz when I was in catholic school studying my catechism, that is exactly what I was taught and I remember asking "What if a woman has a hysterectomy and therefore can't have children?" and Sister Charlotte said, "she can still hope for a miricle" and winked at me.

          • Not true. The notion is "don't be SURPRISED if there is a pregnancy." Never forget: that's what is SUPPOSED to happen.

            And we really have to stop judging anceint cultures as "prudish" and "frightened of sexuality" when they had no technology. To them, sex was for procreation because that's what happened when they did it! Therefore, a cultural system develops to contain the urge and punish those who step outside of the lines.

            It's like that sick bitch Sanger who was fighting for abortion when it was completely unsafe. It wasn't unsafe because it was illegal; it was unsafe in every and any case because it was the early 1900s for cryin' out loud. Mae West was permanently damaged by an abortion, and she was the richest woman on the planet. Not even she could get good technology because it didn't exist.

  • The Democrat Party has reduced us to our body parts...but they omitted the brain.

    I thought they had hit rock bottom with the ad featuring elderly ladies shouting obscenities and threatening violence against Mitt Romney but this ad is even dumber and more offensive.

    • "this ad is dumber and more offensive"
      Dead right. But the dems are well aware of the intelligence and common sense level of their base, who undoubted think, "Yeah. Dats right. I'm gonna vote for whatisname, dat black guy."