Vagina 2012. “Vote with your vagina. Vote for Barak (sic) Obama. If you have a vagina or love someone who does, share this video.” Not the vagina but another orifice in the neighborhood would be a more apropos subject for this video, we suspect. The orifice more likely to vote for “Barak,” if you catch our drift.

Leave a Reply

73 Comments on "Vagina 2012"

Notify of

Karmaa
Member
Karmaa
November 5, 2012 2:53 pm

I am so grossed out by that. Seriously. I am depressed that anyone would portray herself in such a way, and I am really disgusted that vaginas are even a talking point. These creepy womenl say “leave my lady parts alone” and then they go out there and put them practically in neon lights. Confused much?

Kip Hooker
Member
November 5, 2012 8:11 am

So according to this gay men will only vote for Obama if they don’t plan on marrying someone with a vagina. Good deal. I’m sure Roms will be glad to know he is getting Bary’s vote this year.

Progressive Hemrrhoid
Member
Progressive Hemrrhoid
November 5, 2012 6:16 am

A perfect representation of what organ the typical liberal thinks with. I guess their new motto should be “If it feels good, vote with it”

MGAP
Member
MGAP
November 5, 2012 5:48 am

Ahh, the democrat party voting with their vajayjay’s instead of their hearts. By golly, that’s CHANGE, obama’s finally done it! FORWARD now, lead with your clit*s.

Neo-7
Member
Neo-7
November 5, 2012 5:58 am

Transgenders may or may not have clit*s or real vaginas for that matter . You make an assumption that doesn’t exist in the world of make believe .

MGAP
Member
MGAP
November 5, 2012 6:16 am

Let them charge FORWARD on golden unicorns. 😉

RobertW
Member
November 5, 2012 9:09 am

according to uni lore, ain’t none of these little sexually immoral ppl stand a chance of taming one.

but, maybe they’ll get the point

flashingscotsman
Member
November 5, 2012 5:10 pm

They can go for a RIDE on my unicorn, for a price. But we’ll have none of that forward nonsense. I have my standards.

RobertW
Member
November 5, 2012 5:13 pm

here’s hoping you use bon-ami, borateem plus, consan triple action 20, summer’s eve or at the very least good ole bleach, after each one.

flashingscotsman
Member
November 6, 2012 7:35 pm

Suede cleaner.

RobertW
Member
November 6, 2012 7:39 pm

OH.

Very nice, Very nice indeed!

drb
Member
drb
November 5, 2012 1:45 am

Why does the left insist on reducing us to our lady parts? Sorry, but I like to think of myself as so much more than just that.

ooddballz
Member
ooddballz
November 5, 2012 3:00 am

So do we, drb. We love you most for your brain. (But I’m betting the legs look pretty darn good too.)

drb
Member
drb
November 5, 2012 3:12 am

Soooo, you’re reducing me to my leg parts?? HAHA jkjk…Thank you Ooddz, I appreciate that.

poppajoe49
Member
poppajoe49
November 5, 2012 8:00 am

And I got a smackdown for the same thing!

HARUMPH!

drb
Member
drb
November 5, 2012 8:22 am

You didn’t talk about my brain first. 😉

CO2Insanity
Admin
November 5, 2012 10:54 am

poppajoe’s using the wrong brain.

drb
Member
drb
November 5, 2012 10:58 am

been known to happen

hisham
Guest
hisham
November 4, 2012 9:11 pm

This is just too godless for words!

RKae
Member
RKae
November 4, 2012 9:19 pm

They don’t need God. They worship Nature… and themselves.

poppajoe49
Member
poppajoe49
November 5, 2012 7:59 am

Gaia?

hisham
Guest
hisham
November 4, 2012 10:27 pm

Isn’t that the truth!

RKae
Member
RKae
November 4, 2012 8:55 pm

A vagina is a reproductive organ, not an entertainment center. It’s connected to a womb… in which a human being is created. If you make sex into a hobby then you’re going to have to do something with the people you create – usually killing them seems to be the answer. It was the answer for the pagans who strangled theirs, ripped their heads off, left them out for wolves to eat or simply threw them into the nearest river.

The pagans are back… like they never went away. And they’re just as sex obsessed and bloodthirsty as ever.

poppajoe49
Member
poppajoe49
November 5, 2012 7:59 am

A vagina is a reproductive organ, not an entertainment center.

Welllllllll, sometimes it is.

RKae
Member
RKae
November 5, 2012 10:42 am

It will eventually remind you of its intended purpose.

RobertW
Member
November 5, 2012 11:00 am

maybe we can all agree that it’s a type of recreation center?

drb
Member
drb
November 5, 2012 11:03 am

*no*…recreation centers are supposed to be open to the public…not happening over here, just sayin’. >.> (daggar eyes aimed in your general direction)

RobertW
Member
November 5, 2012 12:09 pm

there’s community rec centers, usually wrecked, and then there are private rec centers, aka the marriage bed is undefiled.

😛

unless one is an RC, then it’s just a procreation/potty center.

right, or am I mistaken in RC teachings?

RKae
Member
RKae
November 5, 2012 12:41 pm

You are mistaken. Sex is also for expression of affection and intimacy, but never forget that its primary purpose is reproduction.

RobertW
Member
November 5, 2012 12:50 pm

i dig.
before the fall there was no need for procreation between Adam and Eve before the fall. Matter of fact, or so it seems, it wasn’t til after the expulsion from the garden that Adam biblically knew Eve.
But I always thought that the RC taught only procreation was/is permissible for RC adherents.
thanks for clearing that up.

drb
Member
drb
November 5, 2012 1:03 pm

RC…the teaching is that sex is supposed to only happen within the context of a marriage and with the purposeful intent and hope of producing a child. So if you don’t want a child…you are supposed to abstain even if you are married…..yeah, like that’s gonna happen…

RobertW
Member
November 5, 2012 7:56 pm

i need sleep too. I have a vote to cast and, daylight savings time has attacked me!

oh ty for the info re: the turks Deadman.

pleasant dreams all!

drb
Member
drb
November 5, 2012 7:52 pm

I think I have reached he end of my usefulness in this conversation, so I will bid you both goodnight as I will need to get up at o dark hundred in the morning…good sleepies

Deadman
Member
November 5, 2012 7:46 pm

Turks have not apologised for their past genocides but, contrariwise, they tend to cause a great fuss whenever other sovereign countries raise monuments thereto. In 1973 Turkey recalled its ambassador to France to because the French established a monument to the Armenian genocide, and there are few more recent monuments in Australian states which the Turks vociferously opposed.

RobertW
Member
November 5, 2012 7:36 pm

yes Deadman.
In my understanding, the antecedent must be “Thou art the Christ, the Son of the Living God.”

Enjoyed the discussion drb.

btw, do you or anybody here know if the turks ever recognized, let alone accepted and apologized for their genocide against the Armenian Bulgarian, and Balkanesian Christians?

If not, then why oh why would barry be in bed with them?

Deadman
Member
November 5, 2012 7:26 pm

Πέτρος is masculine and πέτρα is feminine, true; but the ταύτῃ—“this”—in ἐπὶ ταύτῃ τῇ πέτρᾳ—“upon this rock”—has to refer to a antecedent, which anyone may pardonably regard as σὺ—“thee”—namely, Peter, unless, of course, we imagine Jesus pointing at His own chest as He said “this”.
A problem would be removed if we remember that Πέτρος is a movable or rolling stone, easily moved or thrown, whereas πέτρα is solid rock or a shelf, or even a cliff, resolute and immobile.
So a less ambiguous translation (whilst still retaining a flavour of the wordplay), perhaps, would be: “Moreover, I say unto thee, that thou art the Stone, but upon solid rock shall I build my church, and the gates of hell will not prevail against it.”

drb
Member
drb
November 5, 2012 7:21 pm

Well, Robert, I think we have reached the end of my knowledge on the subject…never heard of any “petra”…don’t recall that term/name being used… Priests were recruited to carry on the work of spreading the gospel as the apostles weren’t going to live forever and I said they were *like* apostles not that they are apostles nor equal to apostles so I don’t know what you mean by “apostolic succession”
Peter was chosen by Jesus to be leader of the church…but that doesn’t make him Jesus jr. Who ever said he couldn’t be questioned, criticized or challenged?

RobertW
Member
November 5, 2012 6:42 pm

“I say also unto thee [to Peter], That thou art Peter [petros, masculine gender], and upon this Rock [petra, feminine gender] I will build My church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it” (Matt. 16:18). The text indi­cates clearly that the church of Christ is built on petra and not on Petros.

Now, who is this petra or rock on which Christ built His true church? Let the Holy Bible again give the answer. If the Bible gives the answer, we make no mistake in accepting it because the definition is authentic. “They drank of that spiritual Rock that followed them: and that Rock [petra, in the Greek] was Christ” (1 Corinthians 10:4). Here we have evidence that petra refers to Christ, and not to Peter, petros. Again we quote: “Jesus Christ Himself being the chief Cornerstone” (Ephesians 2:20) “He is the Rock, His work is perfect” (Deuteronomy 32:4; 2 Samuel 22:2-3) (Douay, 2 Kings 22:2-3).

http://www.trustingodamerica.com/Petra.htm

frankly I don’t recall reading anything about apostolic succession. but maybe i missed something, is this something the RC can address?
i mean, isn’t the Bible witness, along with the Holy Ghost’s witness, what we must depend on for instruction since Jesus is resting up in Heaven?
How could Paul, if Peter was the first Pope, rebuke him?

drb
Member
drb
November 5, 2012 6:33 pm

“And I also say to you that you are Peter, and upon this rock I will build My church; and the gates of Hades shall not overpower it,” Matthew 16:18

It is believed by RC that this was Jesus’ final instructions for Peter. For him to literally build a church and grow the congregation. Each apostle was to do the same with Peter as the lead guy, (the first pope if you will), they then recruited more and spread them out building more churches.

RobertW
Member
November 5, 2012 5:46 pm

interesting drb, in the broadest sense the Apostles were sent out to spread the word, not to stand in a pulpit and teach, or oversee, bishop, a congregation.

in the strictest sense, the Apostles were the 12 disciples, then another was added who had to replace the traitor, judas. And then there was Saul of Tarsus whom Jesus personally contacted and made an Apostle to the Gentiles.
Apostles, according to my lights, are those who were with Jesus in his earthly ministry and witnessed His ascension.

drb
Member
drb
November 5, 2012 5:26 pm

priests are like the apostles

RobertW
Member
November 5, 2012 4:21 pm

maybe the priest are drinkin cuz they can’t get married.
here’s a question, since there’s only one mediator between God and Man, and Jesus is that Great High Priest, how does the RC explain priests? for confession? we’re s’posed to confess one to another, at least that’s what my bible says.

drb
Member
drb
November 5, 2012 4:03 pm

That, I do believe, is true

CO2Insanity
Admin
November 5, 2012 3:48 pm

One thing not forbidden to Priest is drinking. I gave a retiring Irish Father (accent and all) an estimate about 9 one morning. He asked me if I wanted coffee I said yes. He then got out the brandy bottle and made coffee royals. :-)

drb
Member
drb
November 5, 2012 3:43 pm

what about the “Honey, I have a headache” method?

Sex helps to get rid of a headache…helps you relax and away goes the stress and tension.

drb
Member
drb
November 5, 2012 3:40 pm

My mother taught me about that… In Catechism class we were taught only abstinence or baby. I don’t know if the differences in what we were taught is due to age of the students (sixth grade at the time so I was 11 going on 12) or due to who was doing the teaching, but it is clear we were taught different things. Interesting. Still, it really doesn’t matter anyway cuz we both know that it isn’t a realistic expectation for a married couple to be abstinent and I think church leaders know that too.

RobertW
Member
November 5, 2012 3:29 pm

what about the “Honey, I have a headache” method?

RKae
Member
RKae
November 5, 2012 3:19 pm

They didn’t tell you about “the rhythm method”? Whatever its effectiveness, it’s evidence that Catholics can indeed engage in sex for affection.

drb
Member
drb
November 5, 2012 2:48 pm

Perhaps they teach the girls something different than they teach the boys then, cuz when I was in catholic school studying my catechism, that is exactly what I was taught and I remember asking “What if a woman has a hysterectomy and therefore can’t have children?” and Sister Charlotte said, “she can still hope for a miricle” and winked at me.

RKae
Member
RKae
November 5, 2012 2:22 pm

Not true. The notion is “don’t be SURPRISED if there is a pregnancy.” Never forget: that’s what is SUPPOSED to happen.

And we really have to stop judging anceint cultures as “prudish” and “frightened of sexuality” when they had no technology. To them, sex was for procreation because that’s what happened when they did it! Therefore, a cultural system develops to contain the urge and punish those who step outside of the lines.

It’s like that sick bitch Sanger who was fighting for abortion when it was completely unsafe. It wasn’t unsafe because it was illegal; it was unsafe in every and any case because it was the early 1900s for cryin’ out loud. Mae West was permanently damaged by an abortion, and she was the richest woman on the planet. Not even she could get good technology because it didn’t exist.

CO2Insanity
Admin
November 5, 2012 11:15 am

See Sandra Fluke for recreation centers.

RobertW
Member
November 5, 2012 12:10 pm

i didn’t say wreckreation. fpfpffppttttt.

drb
Member
drb
November 5, 2012 11:22 am

thank you

hisham
Guest
hisham
November 4, 2012 9:07 pm

And they’re not a wit smarter for all the time they’ve spent being schooled either.

Elrond Hubbard
Member
Elrond Hubbard
November 4, 2012 6:43 pm

The Democrat Party has reduced us to our body parts…but they omitted the brain.

I thought they had hit rock bottom with the ad featuring elderly ladies shouting obscenities and threatening violence against Mitt Romney but this ad is even dumber and more offensive.

Navyvet2
Guest
Navyvet2
November 5, 2012 7:56 am

“this ad is dumber and more offensive”
Dead right. But the dems are well aware of the intelligence and common sense level of their base, who undoubted think, “Yeah. Dats right. I’m gonna vote for whatisname, dat black guy.”

redabogado
Member
redabogado
November 4, 2012 6:30 pm

You gotta admit, vaginae like d!ckheads. Small wonder…..

RobertW
Member
November 4, 2012 6:19 pm

You ain’t a vagina, you’re a twunt!

danybhoy
Member
danybhoy
November 6, 2012 7:21 am

Vagina2102? How about “Pussy”…

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CX7ur4Ey5X4

…& just so you know it ain’t a put on, see it live…

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fG2SWRe7HvA

…much better then the Obama Vag Voters.

RobertW
Member
November 6, 2012 1:49 pm

now tis back

not a rammsteen fan, but i know of them.

danybhoy
Member
danybhoy
November 7, 2012 6:33 am

I have loved from the 1st time I heard them, & I have seen them twice. Last was in May in Minneapolis, & it was, by miles, the biggest areana production I have ever seen. 24 semis, & a sh!tload of pryo. Visually stunning, & hot as hell. Very funny as well, who say Germans have no sense of humor. They are not everyone’s cup of tea, but they are interesting, they are different, & they have an insanely loyal fanbase. They are my 2nd favorite band, behind Maiden.

poppajoe49
Member
poppajoe49
November 6, 2012 8:02 am

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CX7ur4Ey5X4
This video is unavailable.
Sorry about that.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fG2SWRe&HvA
This video does not exist.
Sorry about that.

danybhoy
Member
danybhoy
November 6, 2012 11:30 am

They are both up & running.

RobertW
Member
November 6, 2012 11:58 am

the second one doesn’t exist. the live one, danybhoy. the first one’s working.

danybhoy
Member
danybhoy
November 6, 2012 12:12 pm

Click on the 2nd one on my post, it effing works. I don’t know what to tell you. I keep seeing the “it don’t work ” posts, & I click them & they work. I don’t know.

drb
Member
drb
November 6, 2012 12:55 pm

Yes, they both work when I click on the ones in Dany’s post but only the first one in Poppa’s…I think poppa copied the link wrong on that one.

poppajoe49
Member
poppajoe49
November 6, 2012 9:39 pm

They both work. I don’t know why the link was changed when I did a copy and paste. It’s weird.

justme
Member
justme
November 4, 2012 6:17 pm

That was just repulsive.

I am embarassed for any woman not embarassed by this garbage.

Joe
Member
Joe
November 4, 2012 6:05 pm

Yes women, vote based on what’s between your legs, not what’s between your ears. That will work out well.

poppajoe49
Member
poppajoe49
November 5, 2012 7:57 am

Well, I guess it’s only fair, since us men keep thinking with what’s between our legs. 😉

Not so silent
Member
Not so silent
November 4, 2012 6:18 pm

Why would anyone vote this way? Bill Clinton ain’t running.

CO2Insanity
Admin
November 4, 2012 6:18 pm

Ovary all I’d say this is a bad idea.

Sidekick
Member
Sidekick
November 4, 2012 6:51 pm

Ovulate, this is a real dimwit.

wpDiscuz