Wasserman Schultz: Wrong statements about Libya doesn’t mean they were false

Wasserman Schultz: Wrong statements about Libya doesn’t mean they were false. Piers almost jumps off the bridge. Then she says Republicans in Congress shouldn’t be investigating and criticizing but “We should be closing ranks, working together to prevent this from happening again.” We are, Debbie, we’re trying to fire the people responsible. Won’t you help us?

This post was last modified on November 10, 2021

Bonfire of the Absurdities: After 35 year career writing software for IBM mainframes, am now self-employed contractor thinking of joining a union and striking for higher wages. Cured morbid fear of heights when I learned to look at them as lengths standing on end. Uncompromising in refusal to accept browser cookies. Amateur investor who has accumulated a small fortune in the market after starting out years ago with a large one. For recreation, I run, hike, kayak and play tennis but will not consider synchronized swimming under any circumstances.

View Comments (10)

  • I see "Dear Leader's" attack gerbil is at it again. A major league crock of defecation is all that ever issues from her gaping orifice, and only the most brainwashed sycophant would fall for the latest line if idiocy.

  • Let me paraphrase DWS: "Just because the administration didn't tell the truth doesn't mean what they said was false." Unbelievable, even from a drone like Debbie.

    A little bit of "1984", straight from the Ministry of Truth to your television set. We live in a world where words have no objective meaning, everything is spun, everything is political, everything has to be turned to partisan advantage. The chairperson of the Democrat Party has to lie because the truth is so damning. Here's the truth: Obama is a radical, a liar and a dud; time to toss him down the Memory Hole.

  • Man she's got to stop with the hair dye. It's eating through her skull and right into the small grey matter between her ears also known as a brain.

    So twisted in her beliefs and ideas she's unable to admit when a lie is a lie.

    • With that greasy head, it will only make the fire flare up.
      Isn't there in the DNC with the sense to shove a sock in her mouth?

  • Between her and Carney, there's gotta be a half-dozen different versions of events now right? By "events" I mean both what happened in Libya and who said what when about it.

    • But this is how she rationalizes the BS she peddles. The concept that "Wrong statements about ________ does'nt mean they were false" is what it is. At least in the mind of DWS. I, like most people, would consider that lying. But that's just me.