Well, you learn something every day. Here we thought those Wisconsin Republicans were trying to keep the state from bankruptcy. But it turns out those dastardly sons of bitches are actually trying to kill liberals by taking away their chemo.
She may be right, because she definitely appears to be under the influence of some chemicals.
View Comments (82)
Actually, she has it all wrong. They ALREADY voted to take away her Chemo in 2009 when the House and Senate voted up Obamacare.
Good point. If she suffers from mental illness the death panels will not be that concerned to keep her around.
That's different!! Obama HellCare is a communist democrat party product and nothing but rainbows and unicorn farts.
"Kill[ing] liberals by taking away their chemo."
You say that as if it's a BAD thing.
come back, to; whiskeyriver March 1, 2011 at 12:23 pm
[ Still don’t make any sense child, we “do” english around here instead of texting, sexting, blutoothing, whatever you are doing with your politically incorrect bberry.]
◆ you may 'do' english, - to bad you can't understand it - also. from your 'past' posts i'm guessing you're no 'spring chicken' - so, see if you 'get' this; ''they say wisdom comes with age - in your case - maybe age came alone. ꙭ
At least this crap isn't all caps. Do you stutter like that when you talk too? Looks like you click your teeth and whistle randomly interspersed in your spew. Nice.
you're special, too
Thanks!
At least this post is readable.
I have the feeling you're on a phone, not on a computer, hence the spacing issues and not using the "REPLY TO THIS SPECIFIC COMMENT" button for your replies.
-is this better? - educate me -
what exactly did you mean by your - ''Fifth grade English, motherf**ka, did you take it''
remark in your previous [3-1-11 @ 12:30pm] post?
1- are you referring to me, as a ''motherf**ka''?,
2- and that i need to use '5th grade' english to be able to communicate (talk) with those folks that post on this site? - or that you yourself, didn't make it past 4th grade?
warning; to those who try hard not to make 'long and involved posts' - so as not to be accused of being too 'wordy'. - you'll just get drug over the 'coals' by those who won't try to understand, or can't.
3-just try not to make a real long involved post
You have used inappropriae spelling, punctuation and grammar. Since the point of writing is to communicate, if your can't be easily understood because of short cuts, then you have failed in your mission. Instead of arguing and making rude comments about people's age and education (of which you clearly know nothing) take a hint and use the experience to increase your ability to communicate with all.
Thank you for the constructive criticism. I'll have to brush up on my spelling, punctuation and grammar. your suggestions are well received, and I'll put in every effort to improve. thank you.
1 - It was a twist on a "Pulp Fiction" line.
2- Yes, I am implying you need to use at least 5th grade English to communicate.
3- There's a difference between making a long and involved post and making one people can read. You did neither.
You made a post that is both poorly spaced and used very poor grammar.
This isn't your cellphone, use proper English.
As for asking if this was a better post, the answer is yes.
That is all.
- thanks for the critique -
Stop smoking crack gar.
"Crack is whack!" - Whitney Houston
you're sooo Special'
▶ '' Clarification, to my previous post - 3-1-11@10:54am; ''; ✦ the 'enemy' mentioned, is the 'opposition' - not the old lady. ✦ i said what i said, about lack of 'compassion' - because some of the previous 'posts' were overly mean-spirited towards the old & sick lady.✦ people who run down the old people haven't been there yet. ✦ 'realize this' - 'the only way to get out- of getting ''old'', is to 'die'. ✦ 'big phara' is not your friend. ✦ the '' 'ur shur 2 b nxt '' - just saying, 'pride goes before the fall,' ✦ may you live . . . 4 u who who don't 'get' the above...
Gar, I think you mean 'Big Pharma' and as to this 'old sick woman's' age. she doesn't look like she's more than 38 to 40 years old to me. If you think that's old then you must think people my age (55 to 60) are dinosaurs. And you need to settle down on the seltzer water!
This post is even worse. No one is going to take away this woman's chemo. She is not old (she looks younger than me, even without make-up, so she's not THAT old). The end to collective bargaining for benefits and insurance does nothing to affect the treatment she currently receives. Her comments make no sense, which is why we all seem to agree she is stoned, drunk, or something! Even if she lost ALL coverage, there are groups that cover chemo for cancer patients, medicaid, even a certain amount of pro bono care. Many pharmaceutical houses will provide drugs if the the patient cannot afford them. And if she is on experimental chemo, that isn't covered by her insurance anyway, so that won't be affected either!
Can't read that peculiar code thing you got sticking outta your head. Maybe 'big phara' and you should get together. She might help cure you of all those stars and slashes and dashes. So this 'Big Phara', she's hot, right?
I think "pharma" sounds more like "farmer."
Kinda like the Gloucestershire (pronounced 'gloustah') Fisherman.
DeanH, thanks a million for that mental image of gar with a code thing sticking out of his head, kind of like a goldfish swimming around the bowl with a big ol' turd hanging out.
pericat; I do see your point, thank you for taking the time to explain ,instead of just hurling insults. [your 7:34pm post] - then i read this post, sorry to have given you a compliment you didn't deserve.
And, I thank you, editor for leaving up the *uncomfortable* post. yes, it looks like I have said too many things, that have gotten under too many people' skins, today - so, lets all pile on - get it out of your systems. I've never thought of my self as a bigot, -until now. guess i've got some company tho, with most americans not being so fond of muslims. [sorry, if that remark offended anyone] if nothing else, it sure got the old adrenaline pumping - even the editors. so, for those out there with blood in your eye - sorry, to offend,- my apologies. we all have our beliefs. in the future I'll have to be more diplomatic, much more precise in my language, and not cause such a rhubarb.
I didn't say that *you* were a goldfish, or had a turd hanging from you. Just that it is an awful mental image. ;-)
perlcat certainly would not confuse the goldfish with the gar. He is extremely perceptive. The gar is a frightening thing, like a crocofish or something with turds that do not linger like the goldfish turd frequently does. Gar shouldn't take it so personal. All of life is a lesson. That which does not kill me has made a serious tactical error.
I am very fair with the gar. Every time I catch one, I release it fifty feet up on the bank, and if it can flop back into the water, it gets to live.
Considering how many times they stole my bait & hook, that's more than fair.
fyi; - Big Pharma, is how people commonly refer to the very large pharmaceutical companies. eg., Johnson & Johnson , Pfizer, Hoffmann–La Roche, GlaxoSmithKline, Abbott Laboratories, Merck & Co., Eli Lilly and Company, Bristol-Myers Squibb, etc. you know the ones who treat/manage disease symptoms - for life, but don't cure anyone. over 200,000 people a year from prescription medications - they're your buds - what a funny guy
Why do you keep bitching about "Big Pharma"... From the sound of it you're taking a pretty big dosage of something mind altering... or do you get your fix from "Lil' Pharma" the back alley dealer?
Listen child, you won't enlighten me with any of your drivel. I've been making fun of dookies like you for twice as long as you've been breathing air. Your inability to catch my ripping you for spelling errors purely to piss you off is really amusing. You've come along slowly with the removal of those clear signs of idiocy like the stars and all the improper punctuation. Keep striving for clarity. You may be rewarded.
Do you know how much big "pharma" spends on research and jumping through FDA hoops put in place by big government? None of those companies you listed are charities. You should do a little research on what goes into producing a drug for public consumption. The time and research and the investment are staggering in terms of dedication to treat and manage diseases. Do you really think it's so easy to cure a disease that anyone with a test tube and a Bunsen burner could do it in their mom's basement? Your conspiracy theory of big "pharma" is chock full of shit.
Oh.... I get it! You are actually 8 years old!
But still incoherent.
Somehow, your 'clarification' only further muddled whatever you're trying to say.
That's not better.
Oh forget it. I'LL DO IT!
"The "enemy" mentioned, is the "opposition," not the old lady.
I said what I said, about lack of "compassion," because some of the previous "posts" were overly mean-spirited towards the old & sick lady.
People who run down the old people haven’t been there yet.
Realize this: The only way to get out-of getting ”old”, is to die.
"Big Phara" is not your friend.
The "You're sure to be next."
I'm just saying, "pride goes before the fall."
May you live . . . for you who don’t "get" the above…"
Fifth grade English, motherf**ka, did you take it?
Still don't make any sense child, we "do" english around here instead of texting, sexting, blutoothing, whatever you are doing with your politically incorrect bberry.
- you don’t know a thing about me – to assume that you do – shows you for what u ‘r.
next – awhile back, you ‘posted’ about ‘stupid people are ruining america’.you said; ”Mitt Romney may be a good choice (for president) but too many fools worry about a persons religion, he is 'Mormon', so he may not have much of a chance. I don’t know what this has to do with running the country, he could be a Wiccan for all I care, as long as he does the job we elect him to do.”
- you must have ‘little’ experience w/ mormons -or- ‘you are one’.- or, again; ”they say wisdom comes with age – in your case – maybe age came alone. ꙭ
ha?
What kind of drugs are you on? I want to try them so I can learn how to comment on a subject, that has nothing to do with the subject everyone else is talking about, and still sound like an uneducated child without a clue.
And no, I am not a Mormon. If you had read any of my other comments on the subject of religion you would know I do not believe in any kind of organized religion. There is a huge difference between being religious and being spritual.
I reread my 1st post again,
- I could have been much clearer about what I was trying to say, granted.
I'll apologize to the you,- and the 'community' for getting 'off topic'.
but, I tend to lose it, when the the old, the infirm, the mentally challenged, the dying are denigrated by other 'citizens'.
when some people act so 'superior', to those who get 'duped' - like they're just 'too smart' to ever get 'conned' themselves - I get irked.
ps. I hope that you never have to find out what 'difference' having a mormon president, would make, as you are very correct; ''There is a huge difference between being religious and being spiritual.'' - especially if that' religion' is a cult.
Gar - the flagrant misuse of quotation marks is truly painful. I can't tell what you're quoting and what you're saying yourself.
As for Mormonism, I'm not Mormon either but if I felt Romney could do the job properly, I'd vote for him. I don't see what religion has to do with it, unless the candidate is a member of a religion that calls for the persecution of innocent people. Mormons don't do that so if he can do the job and his track record is good, why should his religion be an obstacle?
Yah, but what do you do when the mentally infirm, the aged, and children are used as a tool to destroy your freedom?
I got a question for you, too about the Mormon thing. Bear in mind, I'm not a mormon, and never will be. I can't see that the religion of a particular presidential candidate is germane to the issue -- but his/her morals, character, and how he/she will be able to carry out the requirements of the job within the restrictions of the Constitution (which Barry is failing at miserably) are, and they are absolutely vital.
That's one more benefit to our government not making any laws respecting religion -- otherwise, Episcopalians could refuse to be governed by Lutherans, Methodists could refuse to be governed by Baptists, etc., etc., etc. Given that one man's religion is another man's cult, I don't see how you can hold Romney's mormonism against him -- after all, Barry's a member of one of the "right" religions (discounting his pastor, after all, Barry denies him (but only once -- Barry's no Peter)). However, do you "know" something about him that gives you reason to believe that he will not perform well (or at least better than Barry) as president?
Otherwise, I see it much as when JFK was elected, and many people threw fits about having a Catholic president -- they (for the most part -- my grandpa never did) got over it. (Competence aside -- I have an opinion about JFK, too..)
bashing the pawns (the old, infirm, mentaly challenged, etc.) is ''not'' the answer, people's venom needs to be directed at the ones behind the pawn - they're the ones who are destroying your freedom.
I'd try to fully explain why electing a mormon president would not be wise, but it would take a very long post. here's the short story; it doesn't have so much to do with his basic job performance - he's likely the ''cream of the crop'' - and I'm sure very capable. it's more like, - I don't want to live in a country gone mormon. I (like you) don't want to ever be a mormon. just, like I don't want to live in a country gone muslin, or become a muslim. so, I'll put this out there; copy/paste this url, and read it.
< https://www.ihatethemedia.com/multiple-countries-rejecting-multiculturalism#comment-69315
this is about how insidiously muslim's work to take over a community, a region, a nation. - there's some similarities as
how mormons take over, a community, a region, and eventually a nation. they start small, grow in numbers (most have large families), slowly push others out of livelihoods/jobs, people leave the area due to the influence, a mormon in power hires other mormons, eventually you have community with little else, but mormons, and their slant on ethics/laws - you name it. it's like the frog in the pot of cold water, if you heat it up slowly , he'll just stay there and get cooked. the advance of mormonism is like that -slow, insidious. there's a wealth of information on the web - you'll just have to put in the time. I know from experience, I hope you don't have to
LOLOLOLOLOL. So basically you fear the rise of Mormonism because you are equating it to the rise of extreme Islam. Right. When exactly was the last time a Mormom hijacked a plane or put a bomb in a plane? Or decapitated a non-believer? Or hanged gays? Or stoned women? Uhm...?
You are an idiot. Why don't you just stop "explaining" and go away?
You're a bigot and a lunatic.
And obviously smoking crack!
SO MUCH FOR FREE SPEECH
Free speech is all well and good when it is done responsibly. You were not responsible with your free speech and hence you get what you get. However as mentioned you were not censored so you still have your free speech, but as someone else said you still get what you get.
You're free to speak however you like. The other part of free speech is that people can disagree with you.
No one restricted your free speech. No one censored your ridiculous comments. Part of free speech - a part you don't seem to understand, by the way - is being able to take flak for saying the things you are free to say. You said some remarkably stupid things, so be man enough to take the criticism you brought upon yourself, bigot.
Well, gar, if you don't see what was offensive in what you wrote, try this exercise:
For the sake of an argument, sub in the name of your religion/philosophy for mormon. Ask yourself if it's reasonable to hire people you trust who have a similar background. Regardless of whether your religions' agenda is total world domination or not, if you can do a good job, you should be able to carry it out as best you can.
To say that one particular religion is particularly egregious about overtaking society while others are not is not going to get you taken seriously, and the corollary, that *your* particular religions' designs on society are harmless and all others' are not is at the very heart of what people find offensive.
That's what is getting you called a bigot and a lunatic -- and that has nothing to do with free speech -- in the first place, you may have noticed that editor *did* leave your post up. In the second place, free speech does not apply to private venues. editor is completely within his rights to censor anything he finds offensive or injurious, or that uses caps lock in an irritating manner.
First,they came for those that retired after 25 years at full salary, lavish benefits, with COLAs.
Since I did not retire after 25 years at full salary, lavish benefits, with COLAs I said nothing.
- never 'under estimate' your enemy - that said, where's the compassion for this sad and sick old lady - you folks think she's a fraud ? - just acting? Is she being used for political advantage - undoubtably. chemo and the accompanying drugs (not counting the ones they give for 'effect'), can make anyone rave like a lunatic. 2nd - you don't thing you'll ever get 'old'? And as a last note - as for you '' don't you know how smart i am's '' - every one can be 'conned' - and if you think you're just to 'smart' - 'ur shur 2 b nxt - may you live in interesting times.
Are you five?
You are incoherent. You must be a liberal.
I want the 47 seconds back I spent trying to read gar's comment. Awful grammar and the spacing reminds me of those horrible Larry King columns in USA Today. I called them the 3 dotters. The format of King's column...was designed to drive me...crazy...if you know what I mean....I think I read two of....them from start to finish.
I do live in interesting times. Soon you will also find out how interesting they truly are. Regarding the use of this lady, she is a pawn of the progressive powers that be. Ironically, if the "EVIL" republicans are unable to stop the madness of the universal health care reform legislation it will be the government that will cease to provide her with her chemo. Instead, she will be offered the blue pill and a prescription for marijuana so she can bake her way to the cemetary. Now, as to her comment; I won't die for the budget. I don't understand that selfish sentiment. My entire adult life I have been a US Marine, dying is part of risk I have assumed in order to earn my pay. Frankly, if my dying assists somebody else to live, I am fine with that. Semper Fidelis
Skeptics are never deceived.
gar,
Ummm...okay, thanks for your input. Maybe you should try again, this time without the assistance of a bong.
Please organize that thought so we might understand what the hell you're saying.
My aunt went through chemo so I am the last person who would be laughing at this lady. I'm only wondering if some of these Union bully boys paid her for this.
There is a great likelihood her liberal friends have used her to drum up support from numbskulls that think like you do.
Exactly. She is being used as a hostage. "One false move from you conservatives, and this pathetic creature gets it."
I never negotiate with hostage-takers.
(That's why I object to 'baby on board' stickers, too. Are we supposed to drive more safely because we might hurt a kid? How about just drive safely in the first place, and there's no need to use children to extort good driving skills out of the guy behind you.)
What's even worse than the "baby on board" stickers are the stickers with the children's names on them.
To me that's like saying "Hello Mr. Pedophile, here are our children's names, so that you'll have an easier time kidnapping them."
"She may be right, because she definitely appears to be under the influence of some chemicals."
♫ There is no pain you are receding ♫
♫ A distant ship's smoke on the horizon ♫
Pink Floyd. One of my all-time favorite songs. Nice call, GF.
Thanks, I just thought the song was appropriate for whatever she's on.
Well, minus the relaxed feelings.
Yep, but *she* has a special version of the song, written just for her. The title? "Comfortably Dumb"
I wonder how much she got paid for that? Just asking.
This poor woman looks like she has other issues besides chemo. She talks like she's on real powerful psychotropics. Poor gal, I doubt she really knows where she is. Talk about liberal compassion for the less fortunate!
Bat Shit meet Crazy. Crazy meet Bat Shit.
I prefer Bat-shit insane.