GLOBAL WARMING: SO DISHONEST IT MAKES ENRON LOOK LIKE A PARAGON OF INTEGRITY. Even Ponzi is laughing at this one.
GLOBAL WARMING: SO DISHONEST IT MAKES ENRON LOOK LIKE A PARAGON OF INTEGRITY. Even Ponzi is laughing at this one.
This website uses cookies.
View Comments (9)
It is time for us to go full Jihad on these weather assholes.....Treat them like ISIS treats it's "guests"....
I heard on the radio today that the claim that Oct 2014 was the hottest Oct on record, was because *someone accidentally* used the September temperature data. This was discovered when someone compared the two months and found ALL the data was identical for each day of the month.
That is BS, the entire "global warming/climate change" movement is an international financial criminal conspiracy, & evidence of this keeps appearing. They should be treated as such, but that won't happen. Not yet anyway, & we know why.
The domocrat morons want to believe this drivel. The democrat party leaders want to promote this as a way to pilfer money from the government. All us 'deniers' are a drag on the scam. How do you exPect these democrats to make a dishonest living if you expose the scam?
soon as one of those middle eastern lunatics lobs a nuke, we will def have us some climate change, i'd imagine... but it ain't coming from my pickup truck.
i will say this, tho, knowing how shady the leftards are, they fear that once all 7 or 8 billion of us earthlings begin to eat cows, we will have problems trying to keep up livestock and feed inventories. as most of you know, the entire pro-choice thing is about eugenics, too, aimed at those who multiply like bunnies. Africa & the ME hate western ideas like birth control and gender equality more than our colonial line-drawings in their sand.
the elitist left is extremely good at pretending to love the world... the dummies who agree with them are gonna find out the hard way how much they're loved.
Speaking of Enron, you may recall that the whole cap and trade scam was whipped up by Krugtron the Invincible(Paul Krugman), solely in order to put more money in the wallets of Ken Lay and the rest of his Enron buddies. Ponzi was a piker.
Damn straight. Unlike social security participation in one of Charles Ponzi's schemes was never mandatory.
And the proponents in my world wonder why I'm a skeptic and opponent. Sheesh, is it really that hard to understand?
With evidence this explicit the only option they really have is to ignore it.