Report: Schumer readies inversion bill

View Comments (19)

• Speaking of Chuckie, "...former senior aide to Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY)'

  http://www.jammiewf.com/2014/holder-stooge-trying-to-coordinate-irs-coverup-accidentally-calls-darrell-issas-office-hilarity-ensues/

  Oh, and check this out

  http://clashdaily.com/2014/09/coincidence-irs-decides-audit-breitbart-news/

  • BWAHAHAHA!!!
    PRICELESS!

• How do you chase the last businesses out of America who are still here, and guarantee no one brings a large consumer-based business here? Ask Schmuck Shumer! He has the answers to that question!

  • The Cluster-Schmuck would love that, to the extent that he & other progressive twats can apply Alinsky's rule #13...

    Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.” Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institution

    ...they keep doing it because it works. Maybe the right should amp it up & return the favor.

• Gee, if Democrats want to build a wall to keep people and companies from leaving, there's a big pile of bricks in Berlin no longer being used.

• This is all based on a communist construct, that all money really belongs to the state. His understanding is in stark contrast to the reality of what happens to potential investment capital when the tax & regulatory climate is abusive. Which means investment money will go where it's allowed to grow & not be seized in the name of the greater good of "the people".

• I guess this relates to Burger King? I have a better idea. Stop taxing all the people and corporations to death for stupid handout programs!

  • If they do that. Then how will quagmire and the dip shits have any money to pay for that hope and change they are offering "all the children" who've come here illegally?

    • Maybe they will have to get elected on (gasp) their message?

      • Then they're toast.

        • Righteeo!

• I wonder if Chuckie has ever read this.

  US Constitution, Article I, Section 9 - Limits on Congress
  ...
  No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed.
  ...

  • If it doesn't tell him how to steal, or turn the country Commie, he has no use for it, and won't read it.

• This is pure insanity. The reenos don't need to squash and bury this thing. They need to have a vote on it and highlight every member that votes in favor of it. They need to get Senate democrats on tape saying how upset they are that it didn't pass. They need to discuss it at length and in particular drive home the implications of what could happen once we go down the slippery slope of changing laws retroactively. At a rate of two decades. They need to make this the campaign cry and tie the democrats in favor of it and air their names in a loop of video propaganda. If they are in favor of this, what makes any citizen think they won't come retroactively after your 401k, Roth iras or any other retirement tax planning you have made? Alas, all the rinos will do is shoot it down in mock disgust and play right into Chuckies hand.

• Chuck the Shmuck would get better favor if he would quit sniffing people's underwear in elevators.

• Just preelection stupidity to gin up the base.

• Another "Look I am doing something and those evil republicans are gonna shoot it down bill"....Fuck Chuck and the fat bag of money he rode in on.