The third name on your ballot in November will be…..We vote for the name Suckass. Because regardless who they run, all they’ll accomplish is sucking votes up that would have most likely gone for Romney, with the possible result being 4 more years of Dear Leader.
This post was last modified on April 17, 2012
View Comments (26)
My point is, for the first time since I've been eligible to vote, I don't want to vote. If that means O'bama wins...too bad for us. If Romney wins...too bad for us. At least it won't be because I voted for either of them.
Yea Ron, that sounds like a plan!
Don't vote, and we will all follow your lead, then we will end up with Lame Duck Obama, who will push through every freedom destroying bit of legislation he can, and we'll end up like 1950's Cold War USSR!
Oh how I long for the lines to get a loaf of bread and a roll of toilet paper, the government assigned housing, with 6 people crammed into a 1 bedroom apartment, those sumptious dinners of a baked potato, the warm comfy winters where the heat is set to a blistering 46 degrees to save the government money, because the political class need to party!
How dumb can you be?
I'm given a choice between two liberals and I'm dumb because I refuse to vote for either? If the choices were Stalin and Hitler would it be dumb to not vote?
You're comparing grapes and watermelons.
Romney may be a liberal, but he's not a Marxist liberal like Obama. There are enough differences between the two to warrant holding your nose and voting for Romney. They aren't enough alike that I'm willing to risk another 4 years of Obama.
If Romney gets the nod, and I'm sure he will, I'll hold my nose and vote for him. Anyone but Obama. I sure wish I had gotten the chance to vote for a good black man, though. But the Dems were terrified of Herman Cain, and they took him out early, before he even got a chance to ask serious questions.
I would love to see Cain in as VP or Commerce Secretary.
I've only voted twice without holding my nose. Both times it was for Ronal Reagan. I will be holding my nose this time too.
I want to vote for the anti-NDAA candidate. Which one is that again? Oh, right, only Ron Paul.
He currently has 10 out of 12 delegates in Minnesota and the GOP committee in Missouri says he may sweep ALL the delegates in their state. Just thought I'd mention a couple things people probably won't hear on the news.
Oh, and check out the vid "Ron Paul Massive rallies 2012" to see thousands and thousands of people who apparently don't exist.
It's been said here many times before.
Ron Paul is a genius when it comes to fiscal matters, but his foreign policy is so over the top that he can't get widespread support.
He would be great as Treasury Secretary, but not President.
I understand your feelings, but Ron Paul will NEVER be nominated for President. He is too one sided and frankly to blucnt and honest. People can't deal with honest.
The third persons initals will be MSM
MSM gives all it's votes to whoever is the most liberal. That's how Mitt got the nomination.
I thought Nader was thinking of running again? And then there's "no labels" Nanny Bloomberg, who's basically a liberal fascist under the delusion he's so "independent" that he can't be categorized or something.
Obama = Romney.
I will be voting accordingly.
I agree! democratic liberal or republican liberal...same result.
Don't fall for this scam, a third party candidate will benefit Barack Obama and Barack Obama only. If there is a third party candidate this November I don't doubt that the Obamunists will find a back door way to fund him.
Elrond. I agree completely, unless it is a communist that actually runs as a communist. But why would CPUSA allow that. They already have a party member on the ballot?
Check Google, the CPUSA has already endorsed Obama in the 2012 election, they know a fellow traveler when they see one.
Damn! That says a lot!
They just about peed their pants with excitement when he won the office. My liberal friends swore it didn't mean anything.
MMMM HMMMM.
Soros may already be sending checks.
Headline says it all. Well, maybe not. It does mention the Communist Bernie Saunders as a possibility. Let's all us push a "real authentic grass-roots movement" (heh heh) to get some real nutsy lefties on the ballots, and drain votes away from Socky.
Then those dead voters will have a hard time choosing.
Nah, they'll just vote more than once.
Or more than their usual two or three times? Don't have to show ID, do they?