Let’s see what was on the Democrat menu last week. Mmmmm, looks like pork, more pork and if we’re not mistaken, still more pork.
Byron York exposes the facts in the pages of The Washington Examiner:

Press coverage of the budget frenzy on Capitol Hill has suggested that pork-barrel earmark spending is still a bipartisan problem, that after months of self-righteous rhetoric about fiscal discipline, Republicans and Democrats remain equal-opportunity earmarkers.
It’s not true. A new analysis by a group of federal-spending watchdogs shows a striking imbalance between the parties when it comes to earmark requests. Democrats remain raging spenders, while Republicans have made enormous strides in cleaning up their act.
In the Senate, the GOP made only one-third as many earmark requests as Democrats for 2011, and in the House, Republicans have nearly given up earmarking altogether — while Democrats roll on.
… In the 2011 House budget, the groups found that House Democrats requested 18,189 earmarks, which would cost the taxpayers a total of $51.7 billion, while House Republicans requested just 241 earmarks, for a total of $1 billion.
So when you hear Democrat apologists utter the words, “They all do it,” rest assured that the “all” refers to Democrats.
Source: Washington Examiner
This post was last modified on January 26, 2021

View Comments (9)
Was anybody in D.C. listening last November?
Well seemingly the vast majority of Republicans were.
It is a good thing to move forward from here and just eliminate the pork altogether I actually think it should be considered illegal.
Bagged or banged, Big Al?
Did I miss something? When did a 12 year old shoot Barney Frank?
No, he bagged John Murtha.
That's crazy, but I am happy to see the Republicans are at least trying. This still does not make up for that crappy tax deal / unemployment bill and at the end of the day the budget needs to get balanced. I guess we'll have to wait and see what the "Tea Party" congress does.
By the way, I hope I'm wrong but I bet the media makes them regret that name by March.
OK, I distinctly remember the first time I saw a real hog, as a child visiting Rutger's Ag school, and I remember being shocked that they are not cute little Arnold Ziffles, they are HUGE beasts. But that picture is fake, right?
No, it's not.
Man, that hogzilla is a helleva lotta bacon...