Ever noticed liberals’ habit of saying disagreement with them equals hate? So has Brit Hume.

Fox News senior political analyst Brit Hume calls out the left for its hypocrisy. Correction: Make that their blatant hypocrisy.

TheDailyCaller.com reports Brit’s pissed-offedness:

“It has become a habit of the American left to equate disagreement with liberals and liberalism with hate,” Hume said. “So convinced do they seem of the virtue of their cause that the only possible explanation for resistance to it must be hatred. In the past week, at least two prominent liberal commentators spoke of the need to resist the right, quote, ‘Obama hate machine.’ Hardly a surprise then that the assassination attempt on Congresswoman Giffords would quickly be blamed on what columnist [Paul] Krugman of The New York Times called the climate of hate, fomented of course by the right.”

Hume also pointed out that some of the attempts to capitalize politically on the tragedy are deeply misguided.

“Never mind that the only climate that seemed to matter here was the fevered swamp of Jared Loughner’s mind,” he continued. “The Democratic sheriff of Pima County also saw a connection to the national climate, though he admitted he had no evidence, just his opinion he said. Here in Washington, Democratic Congressman Brady of Philadelphia has a bill to make at it crime to use language or symbols that quote, ‘Could be perceived as threatening violence against Congress.’ So presumably our national discourse will now be cleansed of references to attack ads and targeted races and blasting one’s opponent. Congress better kill that bill before it’s a crime to use the phrase and before anyone gets idea that regulating speech will have any effect on the behavior of the deranged.”

Oh, Brit. You right wing wacko, you.

Source: DailyCaller.com

This post was last modified on January 12, 2011

editor:

View Comments (18)

  • The funny thing is their disagreements with whatever you have to say doesn't equal hate... it is instead enlightment and if you were to take that tone (that you too are also enlightened)... then of course in their eyes you are being deceptive. Whatever... It is getting to a point where nothing that liberals do or say anymore surprises me.

    • Often they are assuming a conservative is doing exactly what they are trying to do. It is like a pothead thinking that *everyone* has tried pot at some point or another - Liberals assume Conservatives are being deceptive because that is the tactic they are using to win the argument. It is hard for many liberals to think that people actually are coming from a place of true belief because many of them aren't true believers - just in it for the power, prestige, and money.

      (Never understood the money part, because LIberals don't make money! They use it all to help the poor and helpless among us...and we *all* Know big corporations only help Conservatives and never Liberals...heh.)

    • Ten simple Socratic questions libtard/progs cannot even begin to attempt to answer without it sounding like a 'rabid chihuahua' explaining Quantum Mechanics as applied to Unified Field Theory;

      1. "If all opinions are equal, how come a liberal who disagrees with a conservative is open-minded, but a conservative who disagrees with a liberal is a bigot?"

      2. "If it's true that the media emphasized bad news and harassed President Bush only because they competed for ratings, what changed now? Aren't they worried that today's emphasis on good news from the White House will destroy their ratings and make journalism irrelevant?"

      3. "Why is there never a headline that says "Government program ends as its intended goal has been achieved"?"

      4. "How exactly does dependency on the government increase "people power"?"

      5."Ever noticed that those who demand "power to the people" also believe that people can't do anything right without government supervision?"

      6. "How come those who hate humanity for its faults are called "humanists" but those who love humanity for its virtues are called "hate-mongers"?"

      7. "If there are no absolutes and family is an antiquated tool of bourgeois oppression, why is having gay marriage an absolute must?"

      8. "If racial profiling is an abomination, what do you make of the last presidential election?"

      9. "Why, on the rare occasions when Obama's actions benefit America, does his base get angry? And every time his actions are hurting this nation, his base is happy? Who exactly are these people?'

      And

      10. "Once a politician labels the truth as hate speech, can anyone trust him to speak the truth afterward?'

  • The left is so deep into 1+1=POTATO that they can't get back to reality.

    My biggest gripe with the donks and the MSM (but I repeat myself) using this tragedy for political points is WHERE ARE THE GOP LEADERS? Where is the counter strategy against the lies of the left? Does anyone here think that Bush not addressing the 24/7 baseless attacks of the left and the media helped our cause?

    Until there is a vigorous counter attack things will go on as they are.

    • Absolutely! They have professionals helping them with the smear campaign against conservatives...where are our leaders!!! Sadly I don't think we really have any leaders, therein is the problem. What ever happened to these young vital republican senators ie Scott Brown after they get elected? I have not heard one word about him since he was elected to office? They need to start standing up for us!

          • That and..what was it...88 percent of the people she Endorsed in November were elected? That has to be some kind of record.

            Not bad for a lady that can barely tie her own shoe laces together because she is obviously so dumb. Don't believe me? Just watch MSNBC and CNN for awhile...they'll tell ya.

  • This is exactly why the Looney left wishes to shut up Fox News and others who expose them for what they are. True and total frauds all. It does not take much for a semi intelligent person to search out comments made by those on the left that are just out there.

    Kudos to Brit Hume and Fox for calling them out for their comments and hypocrisy

    As for the law about having a weapon near a politician, there are people out there who’s brains and tongues could then be considered a weapon as they can make a politician look and act very stupid.

  • There is another law that is trying to be pushed through making it a crime to bring a weapon within the proximity of a politician.

    These "laws" are so idiotic - like anyone that really wants to try to kill a Congressperson or other politician will listen to them? I can see it now "Oh I have this gun but...wait I'm within 50 feet of this congressman! Dang it, I can't assassinate him now..."

    Seriously - what the heck? These politicians are trying to push through laws that just further cement the government controls over individual rights and are using this tragedy as a smokescreen for 'em.

    I just hope the other politicians in Washington have the guts enough to stand up against 'em.

    • Never let a crisis go to waste!

      " bill to make at it crime to use language or symbols that quote, ‘Could be perceived as threatening violence against Congress"

      Sweet. A vauge definition that will let any disgreeable speech by deemed "threatening". Another nail in the coffin.

      "Lets kick thier ass this election!"

      *knock knock

      POLICE PUT YOUR HANDS UP! *BANG*
      Officer Greenburg, you saw that he was going for that weapon right?
      Ya, sure
      OK, case closed. Another domestic terrorist sent to hell.