The world’s tinhorn dictators have taken the measure of Barack Obama and come to the same conclusion one is forced to make after viewing this photo:
The President of the United States has no balls. And the Vice President is packing a pair of bee-bees himself.
This post was last modified on April 27, 2011
View Comments (40)
If ol' Joe's eyes are actually open, which is difficult to discern in this photo but all experience hath shown they likely are not, it looks like he's trying to determine how to mimic the boss but can't tell which leg goes on top due to his unrelenting confusion. Left armrest lean - check. Cross leg - check. Uh-oh, wrong leg or left leg?
With legs crossed that tightly I would even rule out the possibility of vaginas.
You guys knew Obama was a sissy. Look how he throws a baseball
http://youtu.be/lJGkPf9gZzM
Biden's just pretending he's Barry before he nods off. Ahhhh. another dream of Michelle
Yes I agree, very effeminate seated posture. If only they would have stacked the hands wrist over wrist on top of the knee...then BAMN! They would be like a couple of regular Tom Cruises er, um Richard Simmonses. Sorry Tom, it slipped.
He's got balls, he just has to get them out of michelle's purse and insert them. All that is missing in the photo are bobby socks and a poddle skirt.
Biden: You said the economy was gonna recover.
Bamster: Patience Joe; remember I have a gift.
Biden: Can I take a nap?
Bamster: Wait until you are attending some boring speech.
Biden: Did you get an invite to the Royal Wedding?
Bamster: FU Joe
Is that a bust of OJ in the back ground? WTF!
MLK
KimmyQ, real men just don't sit like that, it's not natural, any man can probably do it but it feels strange, like seeing a woman spit.
Almost as a woman sitting with her legs spread open is innappropriate and wrong... I get it.
Yes, that is correct.
Okay I am not "well versed" in the male anatomy after all I am a modest woman (don't laugh... why are you laughing...? I am serious... whatever) and so I am trying to understand the joke here.
Men with "considerable" packages are not ABLE at ALL to cross their legs in this way? If a man has smaller packages then sitting in this way is an indication of that?
As some of you know I am interesting in finding modest ways to find out certain truths about certain men when it comes to certain areas of them.
So far I have discovered thanks to IHTM great journalistic endevours that if they are interested in extending parts of themselves through gadgets or surgery, if they are a certain race or from a certain culture and if they can cross their legs they must have certain limitations in that area. :-/
You have access to the internet don't you?
Its called youporn.com people...not that difficult (but may be hard).
Uhm okay? I do joke around and all, but I do have my limitations. Porn is insidious and in my opinion dangerous. On the Faith level, it is a desecration of real and appropriate sexual relations between human beings. On a practical level, I don't believe in piggybacking in the exertions and the emotions of others. I find it lame, pathetic and stupid. I believe that instead of watching others having sex, I would much rather have sex with a man that I love and respect in private.
I am not interested in viewing random men's packages. That is disgusting. I neither love nor respect them. What is the point of that? I am only interested in the package of one human male and one human male alone. What I am saying is that when I do meet someone that I would marry if/when he asks, I don't want to end up with something small, because I got to be real with myself, I KNOW I could not do anything fun with something small. If I am going to wait I need to end up with something... well... fun. I just don't believe in getting him disrobed before the appropriate time so when he makes his appearance I just want to MAKE SURE that I can tell somehow that he has something fun for me, apart of him being awesome in other aspects of his nature, before we get married.
So the two thumbs down is due to what?
I guess you are addicted to porn Mr. thumbs down or you have a small member?
Small member...
To kimmyqueen,
I know exactly what you mean and what you beliefs are about.
The only thing I can tell you is plan a fun date at the beach or local public swimming hole/pool.
While you will get an idea from outward appearances in swimwear, they do not accurately denote length, width, girth, curve, angle or most importantly, intent, desire, ability or willingness to please you in ways that you will like, enjoy and want more of.
The best bet for ladies such as yourself is to find an open-minded, loving, creative, sensitive, caring, and all around great guy.
The rest will follow for you as god and your pure desires are intended.
Do not get hung up on ego trips about yourself and setting up false standards for guys you have not even met yet.
If you find your perfect guy then the love-making and sexual satisfaction will follow naturally as you both seek to please the other more than yourself.
THAT IS THE TRUTH FROM A MAN THAT LEARNED THE HARD WAY!
Spymyeyes,
Yes someone (if not you) has made the exact same suggestion and it is something that I have taken note of. I don't need to know all kinds of details just a general idea. A general idea is all that I need. I don't want to waste my time, nor waste anyone's time either.
What you men do not realize is that you can judge what you want right away as women-wear in western culture provides with general and in some cases much more detailed aspects of the female body. If you know what you want on the physical level you either approach or not approach with romantic intentions. If she fills out the other emotional and psychological requirements great for you. Women who may not physically have what you want, but fills out the other aspects that you require will not get a chance to meet you UNLESS you make an effort to meet her or you just so happen to be in a situation where YOU HAD TO MEET HER and hence you got to know her. However still many men decide on physicality AND on what she has to offer beyond that. It is not just that only men get to be this selective. It is what it is, regardless of the goodness of the woman, men will want both parts of their desires satisfied. That is why many men leave aging women for younger women or why guys have great friendships with intelligent yet "plain" women, but do not pursue a relationship with them. You as a man know this to be the truth. Not for all men perhaps, but it is the truth for most men.
So a modest man who knows himself about what he is looking for in a woman on the physical level can make a determination based on her outward appearance and pursue to see if there is more beyond that. I have heard of "varities" when it comes to the female organ, although I find that to be rather strange, but overall I think we can all agree that men's members do INDEED offer a WIDE variety that is impossible for a modest woman to figure out without a little bit more personal knowledge of the man in question. Barring actual nudity it is just impossible unless something is either said or there is a situation like you provided (the beach and so on).
I don't understand why am I on an ego trip? Are men on ego trips then when they search for mates? I am basically stating facts. Men have it easy in choosing what they want and pursue based on what they see. Why should I have to have less of WHAT I WANT just because I don't get to see it? Why should I settle when men do not? Am I really on an ego trip because I know what I want and I want what I want? Really? The best bet is to go for a nice guy and not care about his physicality at all? Then PERHAPS if I am lucky enough he may have something maybe yes maybe no if yes great if no then I just have to deal with it? Really? That is my best bet? I find that to be insulting. I am willing to WAIT for what I want instead of sharing myself in search of it. I call that being selective, men do it all the time and since I chose not to be a whore then that is the best option I have, to find what I want on ALL areas before getting to that physical point that is in my opinion only appropriate for married people. If there is a match for me out there then it will be a match where he gets what he wants and I get what I want and we work on it as all marriages should be worked on, on all areas of the marriage.
I am not under the impression that the size will mean that it will be pleasurable and in no way am I deceived into thinking that it is going to be great the first times either. That is a deception. I actually do believe that like ANYTHING else in the world we (he and I) will have to work at it and work at it to be good... great... fantastic, regardless of the size of his member. It is going to take time and considering that I am looking for a for life match, as G-d gives us both (a long) life, it is appropriate for that to be the case.
Now all in all I do pray about it believe it or not and I think that G-d appreciates my honesty (of course He knows about it). He may decide the best match is a man that is not particularly grand down there, but that fulfills all other requirements in life and that I fulfill his. He may decide the best match is someone that fulfills all requirements for me and viceversa. I do realize that in the end it is in G-d's hands. I am just being real with myself and when the time is right I will have to be real with the man who wants make me his wife and we will go from there. Oh and by the way I HAVE been meeting men, I just don't go around sleeping with them. This here is not an hypothetical question, this is a real question. Now I have found many to be inappropriate for me and some have found me to be inappropriate for them, however there were a case here and there where things aligned, but they didnt work out due to issues we did not have control over, but had things continued who knows? Overall though if I do get to that position again where things align and issues do not arrive, I just want to be prepared. I think that is fair. Considering that I am waiting for the right man I think it is fair to see that I don't seek to pleasure myself and myself alone if indeed that was the case I wouldn't be waiting and just get with whomever come my way don't you think?
Porn, by its original definition has little if anything to do with love, since as writings of whores and harlots it regards nothing but sensation and the perversions of lust for the purpose of amassing filthy lucre.
I would like to know why someone gave you a thumbs down. Porn is what it is. It is filth. It is meant to artificially excite people and plays on the weakenesses of those who for one reason or another cannot find enough excitement and satisfaction in their own lives. Sexual perversion is tailor made to create addiction which in turn creates a lof of societal and familial problems. Most of known serial rapists and murderers have said that porn was a gateway to their behavior. It is somehow okay to treat women as whores if they see enough women behaving like whores in media. That is why when black men want to treat me like a rap video hoochie I have to cut them down and tell them they have mistaken fantasy and perdition with reality and they need to wake up.
I guess the troll that doesn't post just really likes his porn... :-/
Package size is inversely proportional to prosthetic penis size.
If a dude has a giant truck but doesn't use it to make a living or a fast car that doesn't race it, esp. in relation to income, they have a small pecker.
YT drives a vw bettle because I am a) so awesome b) have a huge package and c) see a. in case anyone was wondering.
O-K...
Well KimmyQ, first if a man has a rosie glow to his lips, lack of facial hair, as in can't grow any, tiny petit little feet and hands, talks in riddles with a high squeal and proudly proclaims to be a liberal avoid him at all costs. Good indicator that he is lacking where it counts.
Believe me when I say that I will not get involved with a liberal man even IF he does have something substantial down there. EWWWW.
KimmyQ, google Alan Colmes, after reading my last comment.
KimmyQueen,
All humor aside, if a man has a large set of balls it is very uncomfortable to sit with your legs crossed. The length or width of the shlong does not matter at all in the way you sit, unless it is hard.....lol.
One thing is for sure by this photo.....niether one of them will ever be accused of stuffing a roll of socks down their pants!
I'd always considereed them nutless -- now I know.
"The more you know", as the FLOTUS has been known to say....
Spymyeyes,
Okay... this right here is helpful. I got a real question for you: So how would a man sit if he had a considerable member (excluding the testicles)?
Help a sister out. Thanks.
If the man had a considerable member then he probably wouldn't be sitting at all. He'd be out with a sessy lady doin the groove thang
By that I suppose you mean most men dont have considerable members... okay noted.
Big Johnny isn't the one complaining about crossed legged seating, unless he's feeling rather full of himself at the time. It's the twins and their delicate sensitivity to squashing.
Thanks for putting that in such a delicate way. :-)
We consider ourselves to be teachers, Kimmy, and we're proud of our contribution to your continued education.
I am always learning so I appreciate the help.
Biden looks like he's sleeping again. Was The Great Gasbag rehearsing another speech or something?