Congresswoman Lynn Woolsey, a Democrat from California, says the government needs to wake up and take a close look at the dangerous religious extremists who live among us.
Congratulations, Congresswomen Woolsey. It’s about time someone challenges those murderous Muslims.
What’s that? Woolsey wasn’t talking about murderous Muslims? She was talking about Catholics?
Yes, sir and yes, maam. Woolsey wants the IRS to investigate the possibility that the U.S. Council of Catholic Bishops did something – anything, really – during the ObamaCare debate that might threaten its tax-exempt status. In a direct violation of the separation of church and state, Woolsey is almost praying that the IRS can dig up some dirt.
Job well done, Congresswoman Woolsey. We, too, have had our eye on those Catholics for a long time and we say it’s about time someone else catches on to them.
Those Saturday night bingo games are obviously terrorist fundraisers. And who really knows what the St. Vincent DePaul Society is doing with those old shirts we gave them.
Shape up, Catholics. Uncle Sam knows what you’re up to.
Source: National Review
This post was last modified on January 26, 2021
View Comments (35)
This sort of ignorance makes me want to kill babies.
Well we're all glad to see that you are defeating the ignorance by way of sound and reasonable baby murdering.
Did I actually say that I was murdering babies? I said that this makes me WANT to kill babies.
Oh, I mis-spoke. You have the desire to kill babies but lack the fortitude, courage, or willpower to do it. This makes you a much better person.
Tell you what, say whatever you want, I'm through talking to you.
P.S. You're a fantastic person. A truly great American.
Dangerous Catholics? It's a joke right?
If being an EXTREMIST means being a PRO-LIFE, PRO-FAMILY PATRIOT, then COUNT ME IN!
And if being a self-righteous, anti american, bigot makes you a conservative, we'll count you in for that too.
Good luck with that whole living in fear thing. America is the home of the brave, perhaps you should consider citizenship elsewhere, somewhere with a lot of sheep. You should be quite comfortable there.
In what way was what he said self-righteous, anti American or bigoted? Differences of opinion is what has made this nation strong for over 200 years. It is only now that the government is trying to shut up the opposition. It seems to me that anyone who would attempt to silence someone through intimidation or ridicule is self righteous, anti American and bigoted.
When you say the government is trying to shut up the opposition I assume you're referring to the "free speech zones". Obama doesn't use those, it was Bush who wouldn't let people speak out.
nope, can't say I was talking about 'free speech zones' I was more talking about discussions regarding the fairness act and other methods of stifling opposition speech, including the vilification of the tea baggers and other groups opposing the liberal agenda. Just because a person disagrees with another does not mean they should be called racist, redneck or other negative names. If the protesters have legitimate concerns they should be listened to and their concern addressed, not ignored, minimized and ridiculed. Look around, this is what the left has been doing. Anyone who disagrees with them is either stupid or a shill for the Republican party, this despite the fact that there are many independents and some Democrats who are concerned about what is happening in our great nation.
First off, why aren't you referring to the free speech zones? The very name is an affront to the American way of life. We have freedom of speech. If you create free speech zones, then there has to be non free speech zones am I not correct? By what authority, what law, article or ammendment did the Bush administration derive the power to create "non free speech zones"?
I do agree with your position on the fairness act. I beleive that Fox dangerously mis-informs people and that Fox knows many of these individuals are getting their information from only one source, but trying to stiffle the false information starts you down a slippery slope. What's more, if you did succeed in passing some type of legislation, they would simply change their format to get around the law (which is what every respectable business does), so it would be pointless.
I beleive you should just fight fire with fire. For example, if a bunch of people start accusing the president of being a communist and carachature him as Adolf Hitler or something along those lines, you should just point out the fact that they are a bunch of racists and rednecks or something along those lines. Or lets say someone calls the Democrats the "Dumb-ocrats" then if you're offended you should just turn around and call Tea Partyers "Tea-baggers" or something like that.
Fair enough?
P.S. The Democratic Senators and Congressmen were trying to engage and answer legitimate questions at the town halls. It was the other side that was trying to disrupt and prevent any civil discourse at those meetings and you and I both know it.
Where was she when Rev. Wright was preaching sedition? Let's not forget the Black Evangelical churches in our rage. Oh, and the Mormons too -- those outrageous defenders of traditional marrige (one man, one woman - how so last century!) and then we can take a swipe at the Jews, who outrageously insist that Israel is a legitimate country, with the land purchased from willing sellers in 1948. They should just quit-claim it back to the arabs because they have sellers remorse.
Then we have those new agers, inspired by John Lennon, "Imagine there's no countries" treason! all those politicians would have to find productive employment.
And then there are the protestants, the vigilanties of radicalism forcing such outrageous displays of the 10 commandments and slogans like "In God we Trust" and "one nation under God" on the psychies of innocent school children.
Yet another proud member of the obama brain trust, those darn Catholics, who really knows what those bingo cards really mean? code? overthrow? Yep! if I had to keep an eye out for Catholics or Muslims, I would watch those rascal Catholics, I bet the congresswoman would be OK with profiling them as well. At least our Homeland security is in good hands!
I know a Beck fan isn't going to pretend that people on the left hold all these conspiracy theories.
Congresswoman Woolsey introduces bailout legislation for NYC law firms. GITMO 5 Reality Show Trial could cost billions. Pay Czar suspends ban on bonuses.
GITMO 5 ink contract for NYC-based reality show. Obama picks up his Emmy tonight on SNL.
Eric Holder indicts Bush administration. Five (5) star witnesses called up from GITMO.
Why are Liberal women so...what is the word....not good looking...in need of some Clairol....just plain homely...downright u&!#??? Is it some sort of need to be repellent? I mean, ladies, if the barn needs painting, don't spare the brush and roller.
Just my two cents since I am not Catholic.
What does it matter? you can't get a woman under any circumstances so what's the diff?
got to say Jon, that one was pretty good
Actually it's a ridiculous argument. Looks don't determine political affiliation.
But Conservatives are always talking about Hollywood being so liberal. Well, Hollywood is full of the most beautiful people in our society. Based on looks that is, you can't deny that actresses for the most part are good looking. So how can the majority of actresses in Hollywood (who are very good looking) be liberals, and yet according to Dee Mac ( armed with irrefutable scientific data no doubt) claims that Liberal women are ugly. It can't be both. I suspect it's neither. There are good looking and not so good looking women on both sides.
2 Catholics will be targeting the Islamo-psycho terrorists.
We Catholics have already received our Super Secret Marching Orders from the Vatican that the Amish are next. We HATE the Amish. The Islamo-Sissies will be taken care of after that.
/sarc