Most Americans enjoyed the July 4th holiday, a celebration of our independence from England.
But, after seeing this picture of Duchess Catherine on a this weekend’s trip through Calgary, we’re starting to have a change of heart. Maybe we were a little hasty leaving England.
Don’t we really have heavy taxation without representation now? And what did we get in exchange? Michelle Obama’s arms? Please.
We say nicer asses and more taxes, right?
C’mon, how could we leave this behind?
– Written by Sven Waring at DotPenn.com
Source: Toronto Sun
This post was last modified on October 18, 2023
View Comments (30)
I'm surprised the queen hasn't pulled her aside and explained how her own seamstress sews weights into the hems of her dresses so they NEVER fly up, even in gale force winds. It's an easy fix for this issue, although I expect men everywhere hope Kate never discovers the trick about weighting her hemlines.
You Can Take Her , Out Of The Hood , But You Cant Take The Hood , Out Of Her
Uhm... she has never been hood in the sense that for most of her life she has been in priviledge circumstances.
Middleton?
I believe the lady is married, and her name is Windsor.
Or possibly Saxe-Coburg-Gotha, but I doubt it.
You are correct she is no longer Middleton. In short her royal title is Duchess of Cambridge (or Duchess William of Cambridge). However if she wants to slum it she can do the Mrs. William Windsor, however I doubt that she can do that.
Her official title is: HRH The Princess William (Windsor), Duchess of Cambridge, Countess of Strathearn, Baroness Carrickfergus.
It looks kind of fake, but if it isn't, that is rather embarrasing. That is why you got to keep the underwear right, although if this is real it seems she is wearing a thong. All that rowing is great for her body, good for her.
It's real, Kimmy. The newspaper got a lot of flack for printing it because all media attending these events must sign an agreement that they will not print any pictures of the royals that are embarrassing or unflattering. I usually like the Sun papers, but truthfully they must leave the weekend editions in the hands of the frat boys.
But I guess the paper can plead that the photo was neither embarrassing nor unflattering as evidenced by the Duchess' shapely posterior.
That was irresponsible. This is really exactly the thing that the Prince wanted to protect her from, but overall he cannot protect her from all idiots. I really do not look forward to the day where she will be hounded for not being pregnant yet, or she will be accused of having cellulite or a eating disorder... She must really love him and he must be really worth it.
in one picture the royal family just went from a fine bunch of arses to one fine arse!!!!!
Where is Her Royal Highness the Duchess of Cambridge's underpants?
No panty lines. Thong maybe?
That would be my guess...
That's one world class turd cutter!
I'm no big fan of the royal couple, or anyone else royal, but there's no need to be rude about it.
And I was at a car show with a really good bikini contest yesterday here in San Diego, so that picture doesn't really show me much.
Sheesh Guy,
The way your comment reads for a second I thought it was going to say San Francisco. When I first saw that post, I figured K-Queen was Tweeting pics again. { sorry K, I could not help it!}
I wont argue the fact the the Duchess has a nice "cheek" but let's not lose our heads (big or little). Because in 50 or so years that cute little Duchess ass will be sagging. Try viuslaizing the Quenn of England in an UpSkirt photo.
Spo Please. Be not so quick to throw away your independence for a piece of ass. Cuz turning the corner one day, you may come across something better:
[link removed - admin]
"Cuz turning the corner one day, you may come across something better"
Uh yeah. Like a prince, which I'm sure you will look like in 50 or so years.
I'm not a prude, but was there a point to the vulgar link? In your dreams, I guess.
May that yellow "flag" forever wave, or at least waft up and reveal the goodies every once in a while.
OINK!!!