The lesson to be learned here: Don’t try to top someone as quick witted as Red Eye’s Greg Gutfeld. You can’t help but laugh when destroys global warming believer Rob Tannenbaum with one scathing line.
This post was last modified on December 7, 2009
The lesson to be learned here: Don’t try to top someone as quick witted as Red Eye’s Greg Gutfeld. You can’t help but laugh when destroys global warming believer Rob Tannenbaum with one scathing line.
This post was last modified on December 7, 2009
This website uses cookies.
View Comments (20)
Matthew - I appreciate that you seem to enjoy demonstrating your ignorance. Good for you for being who you are!
Da' Bears SUCK!
Calling Gutfeld "quick witted" is like calling Trig Palin a "great thinker"!
This little dweeb needs to be kicked in his miniscule ballsack.
WTF? How did he debunk the theory of global warming? It was a friendly exchange. Nothing like right wing science. Hey, BTW, have you guys changed your minds on stem cell reseach and evolution?
Jake, can you point out where we said "debunk?" We said "humiliates."
Pay attention.
You know, some people pay to be humiliated, maybe Mr.Tannenbaum is one of those people. Actually, that sounds like one of Gutfeld's accusations of Bill Schulz.
Nah....he's no Larry Craig - or Tom Foley - or any of those other queer, pedophiles in the GOP (Gang Of Perverts)!
The CRU e-mail leak debunks "GlobalWarming" from within those who were pushing it. Nothing like getting busted for scientific fraud in the name of socialism.
Stem cell research? the free market is is deciding. Those who are investing stem cell research to combat certain illnesses are spending their money on adult stem cells, not embryonic stem cells. Why? because they see what version is showing progress in the research process. So far, it's been adult cells. If it were embryonic cells, believe me, evil greedy drug companies would be pouring money into that research. Follow the money, it's not too hard.
Evolution? I actually have no problem. It's trial & error, that's how we roll people, same goes for Mother Nature.
When I saw that I couldnt believe it. I had to go back and watch it again. The guest had it coming he TRIED to humiliate the host and the host got it back. You dont do that especially if you want to hawk something.
Climate change--queer as a $3 bill.
Only not a valuable.
Zing! Got him. And the good news is this is going to happen all over the world. Climate change - isn't that what keeps the weather channel in business?
Check out Greg at 0:53. Look at that cockiness. I am laughing so hard right now. OMG that's too funny.
lol, i saw this the other night, and i was like "WOAH! HELL YES"
but after a while, i kinda felt bad for the guy, his face was plum red for the rest of the episode, and he was sweating badly, greg got him damn good
im glad this went on youtube, and then on to IHTM, this was just awesome
also, nasa's numbers were admittedly not accurate
"Who you gonna believe?" The scientists or somebody who dares to disagree with them?
For at least 10 years I've been telling people there's a third option: How about looking at the evidence and making up your own mind? Nope. The scientists have already looked at the evidence, there's no point in arguing. Just shut up and fork over the cash.
Now we know the scientists deleted the original data and faked the analysis so that the evidence is completely worthless. Yet some clowns like this guy still insist we have no right to contrary opinions.
Thank God that science is never political.
The science - or lack of it: The Climate Science Isn't Settled - Confident predictions of catastrophe are unwarranted.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703939404574567423917025400.html
The why: The Real Copenhagen Agenda!
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703939404574567921682049840.html