Words fail us. They’re also failing our attorney general.
Could Eric Holder be any more of a weasel? In testimony before the House Judiciary Committee about the Times Square bomber, Holder danced around for two minutes, performing astounding Clinton-like feats of verbal gymnastics and contortions in order to avoid answering the simple question “Could radical Islam be to blame?” A simple “yes” or “no” would have sufficed.
Watch Eric “I -don’t-want-to-say-anything-negative-about-a-religion” Holder play deaf and dumb (“what?”) as he can’t bring himself to acknowledge the reason that jihadists (another forbidden word) do what they do.
Obviously this administration is more worried about Tea Parties and Arizona enforcing the federal government’s own laws against illegal aliens than about jihadists waging war on us.
America has already had more domestic jihadist attacks in 15 months under Obama than Bush had in the seven years after 9-11.
It’s awfully hard to fight an enemy you can’t name.
This post was last modified on May 14, 2010
View Comments (9)
He's a coward, a pussy just like the rest of obamas picks.
Att.General Stedman Graham needs to go away, like yesterday. He could tell me on a bright sunny day that it's sunny out, & I would have to look into the sun to believe it. He is 100% full of crap, I don't believe anything he says, EVER.
If you ask one of these Leftists, "Are all Muslims terrorists?" they would shed tears in their passionate denial! Yet, they worry that calling a terrorist "a terrorist" will offend the whole religion? Is irony totally lost on these puddin' heads?
He'd be in big trouble with his muslim lover that made holder his beeaatch
Holder really wanted to be asked about radical Tea Partiers.
And Contessa Brewer was hoping he'd be asked about radical Tea Partiers. She's disappointed again!
Call it "The Firm Squirm." His former law firm had associates (many who are unnamed and now work for the Justice Department) representing radical moslems (Gitmo-ers I think) and he would be indicting them. so to speak, were he to ever answer that question straight up.
The exact same question just switch Islam for Christianity or Judaism... I bet you the man would have said "Yes, absolutely". We might never know as radical Christianity and radical Judaism are kind of tame right now *sarcasm*, but I bet he wouldn't do the squirming and the tap dancing had the question been about them instead of Islam.
I never knew a question concerning the religion of peace would evoke such a disquieted response. Ironic.