Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barry Soetoro, 44th president of the United States — socialist, radical, and enemy of Americans who believe in the constitution. Here are hundreds of articles on this man.
We’re thinking the Presidential motorcade may be rerouted in Buffalo, New York today. After all, his minions wouldn’t want the naked emperor to think that his subjects don’t love him.
We’re thinking the Presidential motorcade may be rerouted in Buffalo, New York today. After all, his minions wouldn’t want the naked emperor to think that his subjects don’t love him.
The Buffalo News reports the billboard bruhaha:
The Niagara Thruway billboard seems to sum up what everyone in Buffalo wants to tell President Obama when he arrives Thursday:
“Dear Mr. President, I need a freakin job. Period.”
Jeff Baker, the frustrated former owner of a small manufacturing company, and his brother put up the sign even before they knew that Obama was headed here.
We know the current unemployment rate is 9.9%. But unsubstantiated reports indicated that the freakin unemployment rate may be substantially higher.
In a sign that desperation is running rampant in Arlen Specter’s Pennsylvania Democrat senate primary race, the former Republican has turned to President Obama for artificial resuscitation.
In a sign that desperation is running rampant in Arlen Specter’s Pennsylvania Democrat senate primary race, the former Republican has turned to President Obama for artificial resuscitation.
That’s right. Despite Obama’s record of being the grim reaper of Democrat endorsers, the President has cut a new TV commercial that actually praises Specter for casting the deciding vote on ObamaCare.
These two were made for each other. But we doubt that either of them are made for the voters of Pennsylvania.
Damn straight it’s a big f-ing deal. The introduction of Elena Kagan as Obama’s latest Supreme Court nominee was the first time Joe Biden’s been allowed back in public since the day the President signed the ObamaCare bill.
Damn straight it’s a big f-ing deal. The introduction of Elena Kagan as Obama’s latest Supreme Court nominee was the first time Joe Biden’s been allowed back in public since the day the President signed the ObamaCare bill.
The President move a muscle as Biden approached Kagan. We think he was paralyzed with fear.
Now hold on just a darn second. Isn’t this the same President who gave the Queen of England an iPod filled with his own speeches? And the same President who refuses to be separated from his own Blackberry?
Now hold on just a darn second. Isn’t this the same President who gave the Queen of England an iPod filled with his own speeches? And the same President who refuses to be separated from his own Blackberry?
Ahhh, well, just consider it another glaring example of President Obama’s “what’s good for me is bad for thee” philosophy.
AFP reports the heightened hypocrisy level:
President Obama being diverted empowered by his Blackberry
US President Barack Obama lamented Sunday that in the iPad and Xbox era, information had become a diversion that was imposing new strains on democracy, in his latest critique of modern media.
Obama, who often chides journalists and cable news outlets for obsessing with political horse race coverage rather than serious issues, told a class of graduating university students that education was the key to progress.
“You’re coming of age in a 24/7 media environment that bombards us with all kinds of content and exposes us to all kinds of arguments, some of which don’t always rank all that high on the truth meter,” Obama said at Hampton University, Virginia.
“With iPods and iPads and Xboxes and PlayStations, — none of which I know how to work — information becomes a distraction, a diversion, a form of entertainment, rather than a tool of empowerment, rather than the means of emancipation,” Obama said.
He bemoaned the fact that “some of the craziest claims can quickly claim traction,” in the clamor of certain blogs and talk radio outlets.
“All of this is not only putting new pressures on you, it is putting new pressures on our country and on our democracy.”
Oh, yeah, we gotta control those pesky blogs and talk radio outlets. Maybe some new regulations are just what America’s college graduates need.
Liberal voters will fall for just about anything. It appears, however, that even they are on to the fact that President Obama’s ringing endorsement of Democrat Senator Blanche Lincoln barely rings at all.
Progressive Liberal voters will fall for just about anything. It appears, however, that even they are on to the fact that President Obama’s ringing endorsement of Democrat Senator Blanche Lincoln barely rings at all.
Unnamed sources (they really do have names, but do you really care?) say that Obama is only doing this radio commercail as “payback” for Lincoln’s vote on the ObamaCare bill travesty. To which we respond, “You think?”
Combine Obama’s tepid approval ratings with the remarkably bored-sounding performance he delivered in this radio commercial and you have to wonder why they bothered. Especially considering the fact that Lincoln may be a country mile behind in the polls, but she’s still more popular than the president in Arkansas polls.
At the end of the commercial, it says “Paid for by Friends of Blanche Lincoln.”
We say friends don’t let friends drive voters away from the voting booth.
Things are not kosher between Barack Obama and America’s Jewish voters. The Democrat party has had an iron grip on America’s Jewish voters for generations, but it looks like that’s slipping away.
Barack Obama is alienating some of the Democrat party's most reliable voters
Things are not kosher between Barack Obama and America’s Jewish voters. The Democrat party has had an iron grip on America’s Jewish voters for generations, but it looks like that’s slipping away.
Israel National News reports the news:
United States President Barack Obama has lost nearly half of his support among American Jews, a poll by the McLaughlin Group has shown.
The US Jews polled were asked whether they would: (a) vote to re-elect Obama, or (b) consider voting for someone else. 42% said they would vote for Obama and 46%, a plurality, preferred the second answer. 12% said they did not know or refused to answer.
In the Presidential elections of 2008, 78% of Jewish voters, or close to 8 out of 10, chose Obama. The McLaughlin poll held nearly 18 months later, in April 2010, appears to show that support down to around 4 out of 10.
The poll showed that key voter segments including Orthodox/Hassidic voters, Conservative voters, voters who have friends and family in Israel and those who have been to Israel, are all more likely to consider voting for someone other than Obama.
What’s the problem? So what if Barack Obama spent 20 years in the church of anti-Semitic minister Jeremiah Wright. So what if he attended anti-Semitic lunatic Louis Farrakhan’s Million Man March. So what if he ordered Israelis to stop building apartments in their own country. So what if he refused to have his photo taken with Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu? So what if his administration denied visas to top Israeli scientists? So what if he’s working with the U.N. Security Council to strip Israel of its nuclear weapons?
Open TV & Film is working on a TV miniseries based on Barack Obama’s run for the presidency as described in Newsweek journalist Richard Woolfe’s book Renegade: The Making of a President. We offer our help with the casting.
Open TV & Film, a British production company, is working on a TV miniseries based on Barack Obama’s run for the presidency as described in Newsweek journalist Richard Woolfe’s book Renegade: The Making of a President.
“It is early days,” Simon Shaps, chairman of Open said, “but we are sure there will no shortage of ideas for who plays the President.”
Since our British cousins probably aren’t as highly attuned to American culture and politics as we are here at IHateTheMedia.com, the least we can do is offer them a few casting tips. One might even say absolutely perfect casting tips.
And while we’re in a helpful mood, we thought we might suggest a new name for the miniseries, too. They can’t name it Renegade, because that was the name of a horrible syndicated show starring Lorenzo Lamas back in the ’90s. So may we humbly suggest a far more appropriate name: The Left Wing.
Please send a limo and four tickets to the premiere party to IHateTheMedia.com, Mr. Shaps.
And now, ladies and gentlemen, let’s roll the credits for The Left Wing, starring:
Will Smith as Barack Obama. In Ali, he played The Greatest. Now he’ll play The One.
Patrick Ewing as Michelle Obama. Sure, former NBA great Ewing will have to spend some time in the gym to match Michelle’s arms, but we’re confident he can pull it off.
After watching President Obama throw like a girl (at last year’s major league baseball all-star game, at this year’s opening day, and at a White House media family day carnival), one can only assume that he picked up his technique from singer Mariah Carey. Or from Janet Napolitano. Or even Sasha and Malia.
After watching President Obama throw like a girl (at last year’s major league baseball all-star game, at this year’s opening day, and at a White House media family day carnival), one can only assume that he picked up his technique from singer Mariah Carey. Or from Janet Napolitano. Or even Sasha and Malia.
Sad to say, but the President needs a lot of practice to get as good as a chick in skintight shorts and high heels. Maybe a little less time on the golf course and a little more time on the mound would help.
If Hawking is correct, please sign us up for the first rocket leaving for January 21, 2013, the day when Barack Obama’s successor is inaugurated.
Stephen Hawking, the world’s most famous theoretical physicist, says time travel is possible. Unfortunately, Hawking’s theory would negate the possibility of both Mr. Peabody’s Wayback Machine and Superman’s nifty trick of flying around the earth counterclockwise to go back in time.
Fox News has the timely details:
Preparing for the debut of his Discovery documentary, Stephen Hawking’s Universe, which screens next week, Hawking said he believed humans could travel millions of years into the future and repopulate their devastated planet.
Hawking said once spaceships were built that could fly faster than the speed of light, a day on board would be equivalent to a year on Earth. That’s because — according to Einstein — as objects accelerate through space, time slows down around them.
Which also means that Hawking’s theory only applies to moving forwards through time.
Moving backwards is impossible, Hawking says, because it “violates a fundamental rule that cause comes before effect.”
If moving backwards through time was possible, a person could shoot their former selves.
“I believe things cannot make themselves impossible,” Hawking said.
If Hawking is correct, please sign us up for the first rocket leaving for January 21, 2013, the day when Barack Obama’s successor is inaugurated.
Don’t look for any deep, mystical meaning in this short video clip. Don’t even look for any shallow meanings. But you’ll have to admit that this is a damn strange coincidence.
Don’t look for any deep, mystical meaning in this short video clip. Don’t even look for any shallow meanings. But you’ll have to admit that this is a damn strange coincidence.
PEter King: “You had countries and you had [terrorist] organizations who are absolutely terrified of what George Bush might do to them …. Now I think many of them feel that the President may apologize to them or he may reach out the hand of friendship.”
Congressman Peter King (R-New Yorkistan) always speaks his mind. Sometimes we like it, sometimes we don’t. This time, he’s spot on.
“You had countries and you had [terrorist] organizations who are absolutely terrified of what George Bush might do to them …. Now I think many of them feel that the President may apologize to them or he may reach out the hand of friendship.”
We’re pretty sure that apologies aren’t enough anymore. Now they want him to bow, too.
The President went to the Gulf Coast and let his remarkable compassion flow like oil from a busted well head. It was warm. It was caring. And it was completely phony.
"I really don't care about the oil slick, but when we get back to New Orleans, I'd like to get a bowl of jambalaya about this big."
The President went to the Gulf Coast and let his remarkable compassion flow like oil from a busted well head. It was warm. It was caring. And it was completely phony.
The LA Times Top of the Ticket blog reports the details:
A Louisiana trip was laid on for Sunday. The advance teams were redeployed and their short prep time showed with the president having to drive instead of helicopter from New Orleans to a Delta Coast Guard briefing and then, as he spoke to reporters outdoors, be drenched in a downpour. Guard briefing and then, as he spoke to reporters outdoors, be drenched in a downpour.
The president was also seen taking off for a disaster scene tour in a chopper. But winds were such and the threat of fog possible that the president only saw the ordinary Louisiana coast.
After all that travel, logistics and talk, he never spotted one drop of oil.
The good news for him is twofold: He was seen caring about the incident. And he wasn’t seen looking uselessly out a plane window as Bush was.
Aides were quick to describe how useful the tour was for Obama to see something for himself. He did get out the main message-quote about BP being responsible for every dime, even though there’s a $75 million limit on a causative party’s costs.
Local officials were quoted as appreciative of his presence which, truth be told, did absolutely nothing to stop the oil, advance the recovery or mitigate any damage beyond that potentially to the president’s image if he hadn’t gone.
Obviously, this trip wasn’t planned because the President is concerned about the oil spill spreading. It was planned because he’s concerned about the discontent of the voters spreading.
There’s a famous ad campaign for Rolling Stone Magazine that compared “reality” to “perception.” Remember that when you compare the perception and reality of the Obama administration’s reaction to the Gulf oil blow out.
There’s a famous ad campaign for Rolling Stone Magazine that compared “reality” to “perception.” Remember that when you compare the perception and reality of the Obama administration’s reaction to the Gulf oil blow out.
Here’s the New York Times (yes, believe it or not, the New York Times) damning the President and his cohorts:
Day One. Day Two. Day Three. Day Four. Day Five. Day Six. Day Seven. Day Eight. Day Nine. Day Ten. Day Eleven. Day Twelve. Hi there, Mr. President.
…it takes the administration more than a week to really get moving.
The timetable is damning. The blowout occurred on April 20. In short order, fire broke out on the rig, taking 11 lives, the rig collapsed and oil began leaking at a rate of 40,000 gallons a day. BP tried but failed to plug the well. Even so, BP appears to have remained confident that it could handle the situation with private resources (as did the administration) until Wednesday night, when, at a hastily called news conference, the Coast Guard quintupled its estimate of the leak to 5,000 barrels, or more than 200,000 gallons a day.
Only then did the administration move into high gear.
That’s reality. But the perception the Obama administration would like you to have is somewhat different:
…that’s why the federal government has launched and coordinated an all-hands-on-deck, relentless response to this crisis from day one. – President Obama, May 2nd
And if that “Day One” phrase was good enough for the President, it’s good enough for the rest of his administration, damn it:
We had DOD resources there from day one. This was a situation that was treated as a possible catastrophic failure from, from day one…And so the physical response on the ground has been, from, from day one, as if this could be a catastrophic failure. – Janet Napolitano, Meet the Press, May 2nd
And if Day One is good enough to say once, it’s good enough to say twice:
Newsweek revealed the Mainstream Media’s honeymoon with Obama is over. Now reporters can only find models in cop buddy dramas from the 1970s.
Starsky and Hutch seen here berating Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for erecting a new apartment building project in East Jerusalem
A recent Newsweek article reveals that the Mainstream Media’s honeymoon with the Obama administration is officially over. Once reporters compared Barack Obama and his band of miracle workers to gods and heroes of the American Revolution, now they can only find models in cop buddy dramas from the 1970s.
Newsweek says that Hillary Clinton and Obama are the political equivalent of Starsky and Hutch. Why?
The magazine claims it’s because, like Starsky and Hutch, the two started out as political rivals, but now are working in seamless harmony to solve world peace and end global warming.
Do you remember the episode when Huggy Bear gave Starsky a tip about where the Iranians were storing the nuclear centrifuges?
If the media is running out of dynamic seventies duos to describe Obama and Clinton, here are some other possible analogies.
Laverne and Shirley. Two crazy dames manage to screw up everything, as they try to remain lovable. Special guest appearance by Joe Biden as Squiggy.
Cheech and Chong. The political leanings of these two old hippies may unfortunately too right wing for team Clinton-Obama.
Beau and Luke Duke. Bill Clinton makes guest appearance as Boss Hogg.
What about Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid?
We’ll let you figure out which one would be Butch.
We love those days when Barack Obama sounds more like Joe Biden than Abraham Lincoln and yet the crowds cheer and the media continues to tell us he is The Greatest Orator In History.
We love those days when Barack Obama sounds more like Joe Biden than Abraham Lincoln and yet the crowds cheer and the media continues to tell us he is The Greatest Orator In History.
Like the other day in Illinois when the Gaffe Machine In Chief said:
“So the challenge we have now is how do we set up a system where, yes, we’re welcoming new people to our country, which by the way makes us stronger. One of the things that is a huge advantage for America compared to countries like Europe is, actually, we’re constantly replenishing ourselves with hungry, driven people who are coming here, and they want to work, and they start a business, and our population is younger and more dynamic, and that’s a good thing!”
Sarah Palin says, “You can see Russia from Alaska” and it becomes a national joke. Barack Obama redefines Europe as a country and mapmakers begin redrawing the world.
Last quarter, economic growth came in at 5.7%. This week the latest quarter’s number came in and growth was just 3.2%. The President’s response?
Last quarter, economic growth came in at 5.7%. This week the latest quarter’s number came in and growth was just 3.2%.
The President’s response?
“The economy that was losing jobs a year ago is creating jobs today. After the single biggest economic crisis in our lifetimes, we’re heading in the right direction. We’re moving forward. Our economy is stronger — that economic heartbeat is growing stronger. But I measure progress by a different pulse.”
The economy slows down and the President says we’re making progress. Iran continues making nuclear weapons and insulting the United States and Obama says we’re making progress. The deficit continues to skyrocket and Obama says we’re making progress.
This, apparently, is what being a progressive is all about.
C’mon, man, no one in their right mind would pay $35,000 to hear Barack Obama speak when you can hear him speak and speak and speak for free every single friggin’ day. In fact, we know people who might pay that much to shut him up, so the performance aspect of the night obviously rested squarely on Arie’s shoulders.
We haven’t heard how the concert turned out at last week’s Los Angeles fundraiser for Barbara Boxer and the DNC, but the pressure was clearly on India Arie to deliver one hell of a performance.
We have nothing against Ms. Arie nor her music. In fact, we like her combination of soul, hip hop, jazz and gospel. But how much does the girl have to ramp it up to justify the $35,000 price tag that Dems put on her appearance with the Greatest President In History?
C’mon, man, no one in their right mind would pay $35,000 to hear Barack Obama speak when you can hear him speak and speak and speak for free every single friggin’ day. In fact, we know people who might pay that much to shut him up, so the performance aspect of the night obviously rested squarely on Arie’s shoulders.
Of course, the real beneficiaries of this fun-filled evening were Barbara Boxer and the Democratic Party in California.
You might think that getting the Beatles back together (as hard as that might prove to be) would not be enough to save Boxer. But remember that this is California where NPR says “…unlike in other parts of the country, both Obama and Boxer could benefit from passage of the health care law. A Los Angeles Times/University of Southern California poll this month said California voters have a generally positive view of the health care bill. Forty-six percent said they would be more likely to vote for a lawmaker who supported the bill compared with 29 percent who said they would not be.”
We’ve heard of the earthquake that is supposed to separate California from the rest of the country. But it didn’t take anything nearly that drastic to separate the state from reality.
Sycophantic reporters are growing tired of getting the runaround from “the most transparent administration in history.” And, Al Gore is angry and says the press gives too much attention to “ridiculous claims” of global warming deniers.
"Now...uhhh...hold on, fellas...uhhh...I'm the most...uhhh...lovable President ever."
Story Number One: Sycophantic reporters are growing tired of getting the runaround from “the most transparent administration in history.”
Politico.com has the details:
Reporters say the White House is thin-skinned, controlling, eager to go over their heads and stingy with even basic information. All White Houses try to control the message. But this White House has pledged to be more open than its predecessors – and reporters feel it doesn’t live up to that pledge in several key areas:
• Day-to-day interaction with Obama is almost non-existent, and he talks to the press corps far less often than Bill Clinton or even George W. Bush did. Clinton took questions nearly every weekday, on average. Obama barely does it once a week.
• The ferocity of pushback is intense. A routine press query can draw a string of vitriolic emails. A negative story can draw a profane high-decibel phone call – or worse. Some reporters feel like they’ve been frozen out after crossing the White House.
• Except for a few reporters, Press Secretary Robert Gibbs can be distant and difficult to reach – even though his job is to be one of the main conduits from president to press. “It’s an odd White House where it’s easier to get the White House chief of staff on the phone than the White House press secretary,” one top reporter said.
• And at the very moment many reporters feel shut out, one paper – the New York Times – enjoys a favoritism from Obama and his staff that makes competitors fume, with gift-wrapped scoops and loads of presidential face-time.
When the Goracle speaks, reporters must listen. Or else.
Story Number Two: You’d better be sitting down for this one. Al Gore is angry and says the press gives too much attention to “ridiculous claims” of global warming deniers.
Of course, you can rest assured that AlGore.com will give you a fair and balanced report:
Last week The Wall Street Journal published a ridiculous op-ed titled “Climate Science in Denial” claiming that “global warming alarmists have been discredited, but you wouldn’t know it from the rhetoric this Earth Day.”
Marc Ambinder of The Atlantic does an exceptional job dismantling this ridiculous claim: “Actually, the subhead should be revised: “Global warming denialists have been re-discredited, but you wouldn’t know it from the rhetoric in today’s Wall Street Journal.” Far be it from me, a non-scientist, to dispute the scientific expertise of an MIT professor of meteorology, Richard Lindzen, but then again, Lindzen’s selective recitation of the litany of arguments against global warming practically begs a rebuttal.”
“First, he mentions “Climate Gate” — those e-mails from the Climate Research Unit from the University of East Anglia. He suggests that the e-mails show “unambiguous evidence of the unethical suppression of information and opposing viewpoints, and even data manipulation.””
“The e-mails were actually quite ambiguous and contained evidence of churlishness and defensiveness from scientists whose data had long been under attack from climate denialists.”
Much of the media has done a particularly bad job covering the climate crisis. Instead of informing the public about the facts, they have treated the issue as if the same political divisions they exuberantly cover also exist in the scientific community. They don’t.
Our advice? Ignore both stories. Disagreements between the media and Democrats mean about as much as spats between middle school spats between BFFs.
Barack Obama, who made $5,500,000 in 2009, tells Wall Street, “At a certain point you’ve made enough money.”
We can tell you with complete confidence that President Obama delivered the same harsh message to pals George Soros, Warren Buffett, Oprah Winfrey, Steven Spielberg, Bill Clinton, Al Gore and the rest of his Democrat contributors.
The Ottumwa, Iowa town hall was stacked with Obama supporters, including the guy who’s wearing a T-shirt that says “Community organizer,”
Last week President Obama gave a speech to NASA employees. Except that no NASA employees were actually admitted to the speech. Instead, the hall was packed with carefully selected Obama supporters.
As if to prove that wasn’t just a fluke, Obama traveled to Ottumwa, Iowa Monday to brag about his outstanding economic record.
This town hall was also stacked with Obama supporters, including the guy just over Obama’s right shoulder who’s wearing a T-shirt that says “Community organizer” and an expression that says, “I love you, Barry.”
“Oh, you mean that Blagojevich. Now I remember.” That’s how we recommend President Obama answer the judge’s questions about his conversations with embattled former Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich should the proposed subpoenas of Obama & Friends actually be issued.
“Oh, you mean that Blagojevich. Rod Blagojevich. Now I remember.” That’s how we recommend President Obama answer the judge’s questions about his conversations with embattled former Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich should the proposed subpoenas of Obama & Friends actually be issued.
According to the NY Post, “Sections of court papers filed by scandal-scarred former Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich that were mistakenly made public show a deeper involvement by President Obama in picking his Senate successor and call into question the president’s public statements on the case.
According to passages in the papers filed Thursday by Blagojevich’s lawyers – which were blacked out under a judge’s order but made visible by a computer glitch – Obama, then president-elect, spoke directly to the disgraced governor on Dec. 1, 2008.
But just one week later, on indictment day for Blagojevich, Obama told reporters, “I had no contact with the governor or his office, and so we were not, I was not aware of what was happening.”
Well, sure, Mr. President, you were probably confused what with just being elected and all. That’s probably why you forgot about talking to Blago, but what about the fact that “Also contained in the unredacted papers is a claim that, contrary to his denials, Obama did push longtime friend and adviser Valerie Jarrett for his old Senate seat using a union official as a go-between with Blagojevich.”
Face it, Mr. President, we all would like to forget about Valerie Jarrett.
The mainstream media is all over this story. Just kidding.
Most of the response from the media other than Fox News and NY Post conveniently have omitted any mention of any potential misdeeds by Team Obama and focus rather on the fact that Blagojevich’s attorney’s would dare subpoena the Most Honest President In History.
Media Matters, not to be confused with any legitimate media outlet, under a heading amusingly titled “Research”, has an article headlined “Fox Nation falsely claims ‘new dirt’ from Blagojevich trial ‘implicates Team Obama.’” The article says “Fox Nation used the baseless headline ‘Blago Moves to Subpoena resident: New Dirt Implicates Team Obama’” in linking to a Mediaite story about the trial of former Gov. Rod Blagojevich (D-IL). However, as ABC’s Jake Tapper noted, Blagojevich “alleges no criminal wrongdoing by the president or his team” and is of “disputable credibility.”
Well, given their ironclad record of getting things right, it’s hard to argue with ABC News or Media Matters.
Several months ago, we covered the vast array of Obama products available on eBay. Well, all that crappola pales in comparison to the new naked Obama action figure.
And as any of America's enemies can tell you, the naked Obama action figure is anatomically correct
Several months ago, we covered the vast array of Obama merchandise available on eBay. Well, all that crappola pales in comparison to the new naked Obama action figure.
Random-Good-Stuff.com breathlessly reveals the details:
“…this awesome Action figure of President Obama from Hot Toys (known for their Movie Masterpiece series)! At 1/6th the scale, the figure has over 38 points of articulation that allows you to pose Obama as you wish. Suitable for fabric costumes at the 1/6th scale and comes with 2 pairs of hands, 2 heads and fantastic details on his facial expression. Measures 30 cm (11.8 inches) in height.”
By “fantastic details on his facial expression”, we assume they’re saying it perfectly captures the egomaniacal upward tilt of the President’s chin and the condescending sneer he gives non-socialists.
And if you ask any of America’s enemies, they can confirm that the naked Obama action figure is anatomically-correct because it has no balls.
