10 Serious Problems With New Accusations Against Kavanaugh. Lots of apparent sleaze here. Burying comments deep in the article, no witnesses, no corroboration, etc.

The New Yorker has not confirmed with other eyewitnesses that Kavanaugh was present at the party. The magazine contacted several dozen classmates of Ramirez and Kavanaugh regarding the incident. Many did not respond to interview requests; others declined to comment, or said they did not attend or remember the party.

14
Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment
12 Comment threads
2 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
7 Comment authors
whiskeyriverNot so silentdanybhoyStrinaMJPTravis Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
Notify of
whiskeyriver
Member
whiskeyriver

Morning fellow haters! It looks like all the accusations against Kavanaugh are falling apart faster than the dumbocraps can patch them up.

https://therightscoop.com/anti-trumper-accusing-kavanaugh-of-raping-his-friend-recants-after-hes-outed/

https://therightscoop.com/breaking-bombshell-drops-on-accusers-story-against-kavanaugh/

Not so silent
Member
Not so silent

comment image

whiskeyriver
Member
whiskeyriver

One for the believe it or not section. It seems Grassley if finally growing some balls and told Fartstain no to another delay. The vote will be held Friday if Ford shows up or not. We hope anyway.

https://therightscoop.com/breaking-grassley-not-playing-nice-guy-anymore-with-feinstein-denies-her-request-to-postpone-hearing-in-awesome-letter/

danybhoy
Member
danybhoy

The big problem, is that we have seen this play out every time a Republican picks a replacement for the Supreme Court. Every effing time, same sh!t, different pick. The playbook is always the same. Bork, Thomas, & now Kavanaugh. The players are the same or similar. Feinstein, Kennedy, Biden, & whoever I forgot to list. Same a-holes who want claim they need “all of the facts” will never vote for to confirm anyway. Bending over back words to appear fair is now a waste of time, which, this has been about all along.

whiskeyriver
Member
whiskeyriver

It looks like that bottom feeder Avenatti has decided he does not want to be charged as a party to perjury. He said his “client” will not testify at this time, he even locked his twatter account so people could not rag on him.

https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/09/25/michael-avenatti-locks-twitter-public-profile-after-admitting-kavanaugh-accuser-might-not-come-forward/

Not so silent
Member
Not so silent
whiskeyriver
Member
whiskeyriver

Judge Kavanaugh and his wife will be on FOX tonight at 7pm. I am going to watch on another site I go to but anyone here who has FOX on their cable or satellite should watch it. I think he is tired of the stupidity and I hope he is going to defend himself, blast the bimbos out of the water.

https://therightscoop.com/awesome-kavanaugh-going-on-fox-news-tonight-to-defend-his-good-name/

JPTravis
Member

Back to the original accusation: Feinstein has finally released the original letter from the whack-job California professor and, strangely, Dan Rather-like, there is a font problem. Wherever you can find that letter on the Internet, go look at it. The font of the first sentence of the second paragraph, which is the only place Kavanaugh’s name is actually mentioned, does not match the font of the rest of the letter. It’s obviously larger, like someone tried to match the font and tried to fit the sentence into the open space they needed to fill, but had to compromise and settle for a bigger size.

Which begs the question: what did that letter say before Feinstein messed with it? Because it’s obviously been messed with. Specifically, what did that first sentence of that second paragraph originally say?

StrinaM
Member

Pakistan’s Prime minister was brought down by font. I’m not kidding. Google “Fontgate” Pakistan.

Dave K
Member
Dave K

This is nothing more than your stereotypical liberal witch hunt. They’ve done it in the past with Bork, Clarence Thomas and someone else.

It’s straight out of the lefty playbook. Smear, dig up dirt and blackball.

StrinaM
Member

Yes. And when you call them out, you’re hysterical and all conspiracy theorist.

Not so silent
Member
Not so silent

From Judge Kavanaugh:
Dear Chairman Grassley and Ranking Member Feinstein:

When I testified in front of the Senate three weeks ago, I explained my belief that fair process is foundational to justice and to our democracy.

At that time, I sat before the Senate Judiciary Committee for more than 31 hours and answered questions under oath. I then answered more questions at a confidential session. The following week, I responded to more than 1,200 written questions, more than have been submitted to all previous Supreme Court nominees combined.

Only after that exhaustive process was complete did I learn, through the news media, about a 36- year-old allegation from high school that had been asserted months earlier and withheld from me throughout the hearing process. First it was an anonymous allegation that I categorically and unequivocally denied. Soon after the accuser was identified, I repeated my denial on the record and made clear that I wished to appear before the Committee. I then repeated my denial to Committee investigators—under criminal penalties for false statements. All of the witnesses identified by Dr. Ford as being present at the party she describes are on the record to the Committee saying they have no recollection of any such party happening. I asked to testify before the Committee again under oath as soon as possible, so that both Dr. Ford and I could both be heard. I thank Chairman Grassley for scheduling that hearing for Thursday.

Last night, another false and uncorroborated accusation from 35 years ago was published. Once again, those alleged to have been witnesses to the event deny it ever happened. There is now a frenzy to come up with something—anything—that will block this process and a vote on my confirmation from occurring.

These are smears, pure and simple. And they debase our public discourse. But they are also a threat to any man or woman who wishes to serve our country. Such grotesque and obvious character assassination—if allowed to succeed—will dissuade competent and good people of all political persuasions from service.

As I told the Committee during my hearing, a federal judge must be independent, not swayed by public or political pressure. That is the kind of judge I will always be. I will not be intimidated into withdrawing from this process. The coordinated effort to destroy my good name will not drive me out. The vile threats of violence against my family will not drive me out. The last minute character assassination will not succeed.

I have devoted my career to serving the public and the cause of justice, and particularly to promoting the equality and dignity of women. Women from every phase of my life have come forward to attest to my character. I am grateful to them. I owe it to them, and to my family, to defend my integrity and my name. I look forward to answering questions from the Senate on Thursday.

Not so silent
Member
Not so silent
Joe Redfield
Member
Joe Redfield

There could be 100 problems with the latest accusation, but the Dems will still demand a full and complete(and lengthy) investigation, and if they don’t get it Sen. Big Eyes Booker and his accomplices will hold their breaths until they turn blue.