At Least $4.5 Billion in New Spending for Gun Control: There was no need of a gun to commit the biggest crime of the day. Just the stroke of a pen followed by a sudden stroke of state.

Leave a Reply

19 Comments on "At Least $4.5 Billion in New Spending for Gun Control"

Notify of
MGAP
Member

4 billion to keep police officers on the streets across the country? Anyone care to guess how that 4 billion will be divied up? I got 10 to 1 that says red states won’t see a dime of that 4 billion. These sorry aholes never pass up an opportunity to buy votes.

GhostntheMachine
Member

Didn’t Zoo York State just tell police they could only have 7 rounds in their guns too? May take that much to find cops just in that state.

flashingscotsman
Member

Make them Bobbies. They don’t need no stinking gun.

Big Al
Member

He was only active in the senate 147 days {before committing to running}where did he learn to spend like this?

flashingscotsman
Member

As a community organizer. Not the same quantities, but still OPM.

GhostntheMachine
Member

Like I said, see ↑ above comment. Glad you’re doing well my friend, despite the rain. Your BLM adventure intrigues me, would love to hear about it some from time to time when it happens.

flashingscotsman
Member

Since my cellphone is now my Wi-Fi hot spot, I’ll still be able to check in whenever I want. In between working on the rocking horses, riding my bicycle over to the world’s largest gem show and swap meet, and hiking all over the desert checking out old mining ruins. I think it’ll be a fun 3 or 4 months.

CO2Insanity
Admin

I hope Obama didn’t use the auto pen. Those auto pens are dangerous and should be outlawed.

flashingscotsman
Member

Is it FULL auto? Or just semi-auto?

GhostntheMachine
Member

Jeeze Flash, this is two days in a row you’ve been rocking&rolling, maybe oughta check into writting for Leno.

flashingscotsman
Member

He turned me down. I don’t toe the line well enough. You should hear the BS fly when I’m in my booth at a faire.

Missile Command
Member

Heck, more spending always works. Just ask Krugman!

danybhoy
Member

Why not? It’s not like they are spending money THEY earned.

poppajoe49
Member

No problem, he’ll just pay for it by cutting the military. 🙁

PsychoDad
Guest

On the plus side, we know he’s full of shot and 99% of what he’s saying is just preening & posturing for the phanboyz (and gurlz) of the Collaborationist Media.

Joe
Member

He signed an executive order which orders himself to nominate a new ATF director. And they called Bush stupid.

“Provide law enforcement, first responders, and school officials with proper training for active shooter situations.”

Don’t they have proper training now? Are you telling me there are police officers running around with no idea what to do if an active shooting takes place? Of course not. The teachers at Sandy Hook all did exactly what they were suppose to, the only sad part was no one was armed to stop him.

Let’s just hope the RINO’s in the House don’t cave.

flashingscotsman
Member

That’s getting mighty damned optimistic there, Joe.

DefHarryMelon
Member

CDC determined that ‘gun crime’ was a disease back in the 90s, and they got lots of press with that. The organization is obviously so far to the proggie left it is always ready to whistle.

drb
Member

Of course…throw more money at it, that will work this, I’m sure…maybe

wpDiscuz