Biden: Have I mentioned yet that these new gun-control measures won’t fundamentally alter the chances of a mass shooting? To this we say no shit Vice President Sherlock, or is it Vice President Pinocchio?.

Leave a Reply

23 Comments on "Biden: Have I mentioned yet that these new gun-control measures won’t fundamentally alter the chances of a mass shooting?"

Notify of

Progressive Hemrrhoid
Member
Progressive Hemrrhoid
February 1, 2013 3:23 pm

If one of these so called think tanks were to do a study of how many people died because they listened to complete morons like Joe Biden, I bet the rate would exceed firearm deaths by a factor of 10.

GhostntheMachine
Member
GhostntheMachine
February 2, 2013 5:54 am
ooddballz
Member
ooddballz
February 2, 2013 7:24 am

I dunno, I suspect the dog just couldn’t take the fact he was protecting BIDEN, so he jumped.

jacksman
Member
jacksman
February 1, 2013 9:51 am

Dont forget all the mass shooters were registerd democrats.

pink Floyd
Member
pink Floyd
February 1, 2013 10:19 am

So what you are saying is that we don’t need a mental health database connected to the NICS, we need a registered Democrat database connected to NICS.

After all…It IS for the children.

DefHarryMelon
Member
DefHarryMelon
February 2, 2013 7:17 am

That is a very blurred distinction you’re suggesting.

poppajoe49
Member
poppajoe49
February 2, 2013 7:12 am

Once again, I refer you to the 1970’s movie Telefon.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telefon_(film)

jacksman
Member
jacksman
February 1, 2013 9:50 am

So DHS is saying if you see a shooter act french!

Navyvet2
Guest
Navyvet2
February 1, 2013 6:59 am

Yesterday, some quite liberal ladies that I work with were discussing, with some surprise, that one of their friends, whom I am pretty sure is an SIEU member, had just signed up for a 5 hour Conceal and Carry class. I believe, but am not sure, that the lady is Jewish since I know that she had spent a couple of years living in Israel. So she is probably 10,000 times smarter than the average American Jew since she has seen reality first hand, not through the New York Times.
I told the office ladies that I thought she was being very wise. They didnt give me any dirty looks but rather looked sort of thoughtful.

PsychoDad
Guest
February 1, 2013 9:53 am

Well, SEIU, they’re gonna be the favored class anyway.

poppajoe49
Member
poppajoe49
February 2, 2013 7:11 am

They are likely to be issued the weapons that Homeland Security is requisitioning. SEIU is likely backup for the brownshirts.

Karmaa
Member
Karmaa
February 1, 2013 6:50 am

We have to beat the drums about something. Doctors are already asking if people have guns in their home. We need to make sure that people understand that the ONLY correct answer to this question is “NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS”. From what I have read, it seems as if the VA has been routinely asking this question, as well as questions like “do you feel stressed out?” or “do you ever feel like hurting someone?”. The theory is that they will go to the vets first, then to the ex cops – the people who have TRAINING in how to use weapons. That will make it much easier to disarm the rest of us.

But, enough of the gloom and doom. Lets have an ironic laugh:
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10151358640831178&set=a.230039551177.135536.6333396177&type=1&relevant_count=1&ref=nf

poppajoe49
Member
poppajoe49
February 2, 2013 7:09 am

Karmaa, I can only speak for myself, but my VA Dr has never asked me if I own a gun. If she did, my answer would be an unequivocal NO!
What they do seem to be overly interested in is my alcohol consumption.
I am regularly asked if I drink alcohol, if I drink to excess, how much and what I drink. My alcohol consumption is 1 beer with dinner each night. No more, and sometimes none at all, depending on if I remember to buy it or not, or if I have the money at the time. A full case lasts me nearly a month. They seem to think I drink too much!

Sidekick
Member
Sidekick
February 1, 2013 9:02 am

Ha! Funny.

pink Floyd
Member
pink Floyd
February 1, 2013 5:15 am

Of course nothing they do will change “gun violence”, because none of this has a DAMN thing to do with guns! It has NOTHING to do with dead children or mass murders or equal rights or global warming or cats and dogs living together!!!

Their purpose and ultimate goal is to remove ALL individual Liberty, create a state where the plebes MUST rely on the polit-bureau for the supply and security of life. Only it won’t be life, it will be simple existence.

The Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution was designed for two reasons..defense against evil men doing harm to my property, my family or myself and to remove tyrants like Dianne, Chuck, Harry, Joe and Barack from power. If necessary to establish a complete new government.

I have reached a point now, that I don’t care a wit about what they do, because I’m NOT going to obey un-constitutional laws anyway!!!

Karmaa
Member
Karmaa
February 1, 2013 5:39 am

I think a lot of people are reaching that point now. I know that I am not going to sit idly by and let these criminals take my last, and best line of defense. I will NOT be a sitting duck to my government or to the animals and thugs that THEY let run the streets.

THEY control the situation. THEY are charged with, and abdicating their responsibility to, keep the criminals and the lunatics off the streets. They FAIL. They know darned well that only the law-abiding citizens will give up their guns when they pass a new law, thus making the strong productive defensible people, weaker and more powerless.

The only good thing at this point is that I think they may have tried this too early. The people who currently have legal weapons are NOT going to give them up yet. The vast leftwing conspiracy really needed to keep chipping away at the idea for another generation or so – but the people in this administration are greedy and selfish. They are NOT working for the “greater good” of the America-destroying left. They are making their own power-grab right now and it’s not going to work.

pink Floyd
Member
pink Floyd
February 1, 2013 6:22 am

The Patriots Prayer

Lord, let me be fast and accurate. Let my aim be true and my hand be faster than those who would seek to destroy me. Grant me victory over my foes and those that wish to do harm to me and mine. Let not my last thought be, “If I only had my guns.” And Lord, if today is truly the day that you call me home, let me die in a pile of empty brass.

Plainsman
Member
Plainsman
February 1, 2013 3:18 am

Some of the strictest state gun laws are in areas of the country where violent crime rates are the highest… CT being in the top ten in terms of strict gun laws. Freekin’ gun laws really work, eh?

Arm somebody in the schools and in the malls and in the churches! People say, “something has to be done.” Well, providing deadly defense against future attacks would be “doing something.”

http://www.csmonitor.com/Photo-Galleries/Lists/States-with-the-strictest-gun-laws#259367

danybhoy
Member
danybhoy
February 1, 2013 12:10 am

No sh!t Sherlock. If any of the leftist’s gun laws worked, places like Chicago & Oakland would’nt have a gun violence problem. Maybe if they looked at their policies & what they actually do, maybe they would see that the nanny state is to blame. Fatherlessness, welfare, EBT, or liberal judges who don’t sentence criminals to proper time in prison. Whatever, it all helps turn thier cities into sh!tholes

GhostntheMachine
Member
GhostntheMachine
January 31, 2013 11:06 pm

Guns don’t kill people, “In every single one of them, the killer was male, between the age of 17 and 49” do. Ban em, problem solved. Hold on! In, uhm, wait 5 months and 23 days, then banish them.

poppajoe49
Member
poppajoe49
February 2, 2013 7:04 am
Big Al
Member
Big Al
February 1, 2013 3:56 am

Then there is Soylent Green people.

CaliforniaDave
Member
CaliforniaDave
January 31, 2013 6:58 pm

“…and I’d like a woman with breasts THIS BIG…”

wpDiscuz