ElenaKagan.jpg
Elena Kagan in 2009:

“There is no federal constitutional right to same-sex marriage.”

19
Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment
8 Comment threads
11 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
10 Comment authors
Red Robsterpoppajoe49Not so silentProgressive HemrrhoidJPTravis Recent comment authors

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  Subscribe  
Notify of
Not so silent
Member
Not so silent

The morons at the supreme court continue their attack on America…

http://www3.atr.rollcall.com/supreme-court-victory-for-voting-rights-advocates/?dcz=

Wonder how many illegal aliens will vote in 2016? How many dead?

Progressive Hemrrhoid
Member
Progressive Hemrrhoid

Of course the He/She looking hag lied. Like any other politician, you don’t get confirmed / elected if you tell the truth.
As usual with the left, the ends justify the means.

jukin
Member
jukin

Democrats, leftists and particularly those that call themselves “progressives”, lie, they lie all the time. They are evil and believe that their ends justify any and all means. Their ends is a two tier society with them at the top .5% controlling all others.

andre53
Member
andre53

Yes, in 2009, she said that probably in expectation of nomination. No need to give the dark side any ammo unnecessarily. She assumed her position on SCOTUS in Aug 2010.

You see, it’s okay to lie to the infidels – that being people who refuse to accept the True Religion, the one that believes in global warming, global cooling (pick one as needed), wealth distribution, special rights for preferred groups, etc. I think they call that al taqquiya. Or is that someone else? It’s so hard to keep track of all the fascist groups.

JPTravis
Member

She said it during the confirmation process after being nominated to be Solicitor General. She was, by all accounts, the worst Solicitor General the United States has ever had, having zero experience in courtrooms and that particular position being all about performing in courtrooms. That’s what the job is, going to court on behalf of the federal government. Nevertheless, being gay and politically left of Mao, Obama rewarded her poor performance by nominating her to the Supreme Court.

poppajoe49
Guest
poppajoe49

Another case of promoting the inept, to a new level of incompetence.

Not so silent
Member
Not so silent

Like shit, stupid floats to the top…

Not so silent
Member
Not so silent

“Constitutional rights are a product of constitutional text as interpreted by courts and understood by the nation’s citizenry and its elected representatives. By this measure, which is the best measure I know for determining whether a constitutional right exists, there is no federal constitutional right to same-sex marriage.”

He forgot add, that’s because “I haven’t made the right to gay marriage yet.”

That Mr Kagen is a liar, like all liberals….Lets leave out a few things I plan on doing, I’ll tell you what you WANT to hear, and then do just as I damn well please….

Racer X
Member
Racer X

” . . . because I haven’t invented it yet.” There, I supplied the missing half of her statement.

RKae
Member
RKae

Or to quote Obama on gun control, “We’re working on that under the radar.”

RKae
Member
RKae

Hey! Don’t you know that ideas evolve?

Now, let’e examine that idea. What causes evolution to happen? Slaughter by predators.

So when people tell you that they have evolved, they are not kidding! They saw the herd get attacked by predators, and they ran!

stinkfoot
Member
stinkfoot

Language evolves as well… in much the same way.

poppajoe49
Guest
poppajoe49

That is why we need the Newspeak Dictionary, to translate the Constitution into the words that the enlightened “know” what it was supposed to say.

stinkfoot
Member
stinkfoot

Well- if the Constitution has been nullified since she made that statement then she could make some claim of not full deception… and much liberty has been taken over the interpretation of words where “state” means other than the fifty united “states”, what’s to say that “constitution” and “constitutional” are subject to alternate interpretations as well and are in reference to something other than what we generally think?

JPTravis
Member

In other words, she isn’t the first gay activist to advance her political agenda with lies so give her a break?

stinkfoot
Member
stinkfoot

Well- yes, but I’ll take the interpretive prerogative to define what “break” means and what part of her is to be broken.

I think my sense is that she’s just a cog in a larger problem- albeit a critical one. She’s something that progressives and RINOs have infested on us when it seemed fairly obvious that this type of “judgement” is what’s to be expected.

I’m merely filtering a rather non-surprising revelation of judicial deception through a track record of bureaucratic usurpers whose agenda she is and will be abetting.

stinkfoot
Member
stinkfoot

Revisiting this because I respect and agree with the gist of your response… no- she doesn’t deserve a break, what she deserves is a lot of company in dealing with the blowback from using deception to get in… but of course we know by now that being deceptive is a resume enhancer if you’re a progressive.

There’s a bigger picture that this is part of and it needs to be kept in mind. She’s a criminal in my mind, but not the only one. She is only part of a larger performance troupe acting out a post constitutional America.

Red Robster
Member
Red Robster

Lies are all they’ve got.

poppajoe49
Guest
poppajoe49

Well, of course “state” means the federal government, and what we have to say, means nothing, as well as the Constitution being made to look like it was written by uneducated, racists and bigots, who could only want to hurt minorities and the alphabet soup crowd, so we must rewrite the document to give all the downtrodden extra rights to make up for all these years of oppression.

/sarc