FIVE SHOT IN GUN-FREE ZONE IN NEW ORLEANS. Liberal heads were seen spinning at the thought that a criminal would actually defy the gun-free zone law. Hint – that’s why they’re called criminals.

Leave a Reply

20 Comments on "FIVE SHOT IN GUN-FREE ZONE IN NEW ORLEANS"

Notify of

flashingscotsman
Member
January 23, 2013 8:32 am

They need to post the signs in many different languages. And underneath all the different interpretations of “gun-free-zone,” “No, really. We mean it.”

Navyvet2
Guest
Navyvet2
January 22, 2013 9:27 pm

Apparently they didnt put up any signs identifying it as a “Gun Free Zone” so the people shooting the guns were not aware that no guns were allowed there. Obviously this is George Bush’s fault, because surely if there would have been a few signs, the criminals would have obeyed the law. So now these people are victims. Victims because they inadvertently broke a law that wasn’t posted. I expect they will sue.

perlcat
Member
January 23, 2013 7:13 am

It’s a failure of our educashun sistum. If these pinheads cud reed, they’d know to leave their guns at home. Obviously, it’s Bush’s fault, as he funded the Department of Educashun during his presidency, and everybody knows the Department of Educashun is an abject failure.

Navyvet2
Guest
Navyvet2
January 23, 2013 8:05 am

My misteak. For shur its the edjakashon. Obviusly thay cant reed. Did we go to the same skool?
BTW I saw a great T-shirt the other day. It read “Colege Graduate” Gotta get one of those.

StrinaM
Member
January 22, 2013 6:34 pm

2A … +21
“control” … -30

poppajoe49
Member
poppajoe49
January 22, 2013 6:45 pm

I’m ashamed to admit that the guy that wrote this is my cousin:
Facebook says to say something about this link-
sadly, all such a comment invites is denial and senseless defense of an inanimate object created centuries ago to do exactly what it does, regardless of the ‘best’ intentions of those who would rather own weapons than own up to the destructive nature of those same objects.
sigh.
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/lookout/shooting-texas-college-campus-reports-191439016.html

poppajoe49
Member
poppajoe49
January 22, 2013 6:46 pm

So I posted this:
Unfortunately, people keep trying to blame an inanimate object for what a person does.
Should we ban hammers?
http://washington.cbslocal.com/2013/01/03/fbi-hammers-clubs-kill-more-people-than-rifles-shotguns/

poppajoe49
Member
poppajoe49
January 23, 2013 5:00 am

LMAO!!!
After I posted that, the only response I got was “OY”, so I replied with this:

I don’t blame you. I was dumbfounded by that one. How can this happen? It’s a gun free zone! Nobody is supposed to have a gun there, don’t these gang members listen to the laws? Oh, wait, THEY’RE CRIMINALS! THEY DON’T CARE ABOUT THE LAWS!!

Nobody has replied to me after this. They all seem to have abandoned the discussion.

Karmaa
Member
Karmaa
January 23, 2013 9:04 am

Of course they did. As they always will when they are confronted with facts that shoot down their stupid arguments.

The thing that finally shut my libtard sister up this round was

Me: “lets just make the white house a gun-free zone”
Her: “isn’t it already?”
Me: “The secret service and guards couldn’t have guns if it were”.
Her:”Ohhhhhh. Ummmmm… Huh. So, did you talk to [our brother] recently?”

tee hee hee.

DefHarryMelon
Member
DefHarryMelon
January 22, 2013 6:55 pm

When there is any incontrovertible proof that a ban on evil has proven successful – to any degree – then they have obviously designed a ban that should work for heroin. After they get a handle on that, ban murder! Guns will be superfluous at that point. Then perhaps we could talk about any gun ban they want.

StrinaM
Member
January 22, 2013 7:38 pm

LOL. Isnt muder already illegal? In fact isn’t that one of the 10 commandments? Though shall not kill? Hasn’t stopped the dark hearted from killing people.

The website also includes an extensive section on what to do in an active shooter situation. It reads in part:
If they do start shooting people, you need to make a choice: stay still and hope they do not shoot you, run for an exit while zigzagging, or attack the shooter.
If you chose to run, a zigzagging moving target is much harder to hit than a straight runner.
Playing dead may also be a consideration.
It is not a recommendation to attack the shooter, but remember that you have a choice to fight when there are no other options.
The last thing that the shooter will expect is to be attacked by you.

sa_rose
Member
sa_rose
January 22, 2013 9:10 pm

Actually, the Hebrew word used in the commandment translates to Thou shall not MURDER. Not kill, murder. Makes it sound like the prohibition is not applied to war, or accidents, or inadvertant injury.

Elrond Hubbard
Member
Elrond Hubbard
January 22, 2013 3:10 pm

In the last election Obama won 80% of the vote in New Orleans, the city with ther highest murder rate in America. It’s a fact that any city that gave a large electoral margin to Obama will also have high murder rate (Chicago, D.C. or Philadelphia anyone?).

Time to disarm the Democrats.

perlcat
Member
January 22, 2013 9:52 am

I’d say that what we need are “dumbass free” zones. Sorry, they apparently don’t exist in places like Chicago and SF.

ooddballz
Member
ooddballz
January 22, 2013 9:41 am

And I am sure the MSM will be all over this, right?

Kip Hooker
Member
January 22, 2013 9:39 am

Maybe it is time we adopt crime free zones!

wpDiscuz